Ask the ref?

Philos_Finest

New member
I like the rule change of Home = Color, Away = White but I wish they would have announced it before new uniforms were ordered last year. Traditionally, on the Home uniform, the School Nickname (i.e. Crew) is emblazoned on the jersey and on the Away uniform, the School/City Name is on the jersey (i.e. Columbus).
Where does this “traditionally” occur? Genuinely curious.. I’ve never seen/heard of such a thing.
 

WX Dude

New member
I've never fully understood the "incidental contact" exception to hand ball in soccer. Every time I think I have it nailed down I see something like this:
https://tinyurl.com/yahdmztu
Is this a blown call or incidental contact? If it's incidental contact,Why?
 

WX Dude

New member
Not sure if you looked at the video, but no, there was no intent. And yes the arm was in a natural position away from the body. But does that matter when the contact gives them the advantage?
 

EastYoungstown

Active member
Not sure if you looked at the video, but no, there was no intent. And yes the arm was in a natural position away from the body. But does that matter when the contact gives them the advantage?
I did watch it.

I was asking you.

I'm not sure her hitting the ball did anything except actually make the ball bounce away from her and make it harder for her to collect it and score. Otherwise it drops right at her feet.

No intent.

No advantage.

In the moment it's tough. I probably call that on first glance.

Looking at the replay though I think that's a goal and if that's what the ref gave then kudos to him/her.
 

WX Dude

New member
So its as I thought... Total judgement call on incidental contact. The ref did allow the goal over strenuous objections from the coach. And in another discussion two former refs say its a handball because the arms were away from the body.
Ultimately it did not change the outcome if the game.
 
While the rules say "deliberate," I think we all can agree that judging "intent" isn't exactly what is done on handling calls.

Her hands/arms were "deliberately" in a non-soccer playing position, so there could be the reasoning behind whistling the handling.
 

MJ_SoccerRef

New member
I took a look at the video.....and here's MY 'opinion'......

Whistle / Handling. No goal. The arm began in an elevated position, with the hand near shoulder level......IMHO, an unnecessary position position given the fact the player didn't jump THAT high off the ground. More importantly.....MOST importantly......the arm moved downward & caused the contact with the ball. "Intent" is derived from what we SEE happen.....a player's arms go where the mind tells them to; the arm doesn't act independently......thus the very act of 'handling' (a verb indicating action) at the least implies 'intent'. This is contrary to a ball striking the limb, that is both not moving AND in a more natural position, one where the player is not "making themselves' bigger' (the more recent wording from FIFA).

It should be noted that whether the ball/hand contact 'benefitted' the player has NEVER been a consideration for ruling said contact 'handling'. That's one of 'The Old Wive's Tales" of soccer.......right next to "I got the ball first!" & "The Throw-In has spin on it!".

Lastly......many, if not most, infraction calls are "In The Opinion Of The Referee", and frequently "Opinions Vary", among a number of other factors that affect how we evaluate what we see, IF we in fact SEE it.....
 

jperona

New member
Interesting discussion on the natural hand position being a factor and not the advantage. Did anyone see the handball call in the girls D1 final? In the video stream you could barely tell the hand hit that ball and the hand was in a natural position. It resulted in a PK but didn’t change the outcome of the game. Just wanted to hear someone’s explanation on how that was egregious enough to qualify for a PK.
 

MJ_SoccerRef

New member
Interesting discussion on the natural hand position being a factor and not the advantage. Did anyone see the handball call in the girls D1 final? In the video stream you could barely tell the hand hit that ball and the hand was in a natural position. It resulted in a PK but didn’t change the outcome of the game. Just wanted to hear someone’s explanation on how that was egregious enough to qualify for a PK.
Without having seen the video.......in general, I think it's important when evaluating Calls & No Calls to attempt to visualize what the particular incident looked like from the angle & distance the Center Referee had at that point in time. We NEVER have the same angle as anyone recording a video.......and observing play from an elevated position makes the Field Of View 3 dimensional, vice the 2 dimensional view we have at field level, among the players. Just some factors.......
 

USA70PP

Active member
I saw this in a match a day or so ago. Goalkeeper came out in front of the box to stop a ball. It bounces and strikes his hands. Is this a hand ball? Just how and where can a goalkeeper use his hands to field a ball?
 

bucksman

Moderator
I saw this in a match a day or so ago. Goalkeeper came out in front of the box to stop a ball. It bounces and strikes his hands. Is this a hand ball? Just how and where can a goalkeeper use his hands to field a ball?
If it is outside of the penalty area (in non-referee parlance, the "18-yard box"), the goalkeeper is like any other field player and is governed by the same rules as it relates to handling.
 

HSfooty1977

New member
I've never fully understood the "incidental contact" exception to hand ball in soccer. Every time I think I have it nailed down I see something like this:
https://tinyurl.com/yahdmztu
Is this a blown call or incidental contact? If it's incidental contact,Why?
Intent does not matter, if it is an intentional hand ball, it should be a yellow card, red card if it prevents a goal.
IN regards to this video, the player arm is away from body and it is a poor touch that allows the ball to strike the hand and gain an advantage. Definitely a blown call!!
 

sig4969

Member
out of soccer for over 10 ten years,

When did the rule changed : playing a goal kick before the ball exit the box ?
 

bucksman

Moderator
out of soccer for over 10 ten years,

When did the rule changed : playing a goal kick before the ball exit the box ?
IFAB/FIFA laws of the game change effective 6/1/19.

Should be noted that this is not yet in effect for USSF sanctioned games, as USSF does not implement the revised IFAB/FIFA LOTG until the following January 1st.

Obviously NFHS (high school) and NISOA (college) have not implemented it for this year, though who knows what they will do come one year from now.
 

MJ_SoccerRef

New member
I saw this in a match a day or so ago. Goalkeeper came out in front of the box to stop a ball. It bounces and strikes his hands. Is this a hand ball? Just how and where can a goalkeeper use his hands to field a ball?
Obviously, the Keeper can legally play the ball inside his/her own Penalty Area. The Keeper may be called for handling ONLY when they are contacting the ball with the hand, arm, etc. AFTER the entire ball has cleared the 18, and hence the PA itself (ALL of the lines on the field are part of the area they form a boundary for). Any 'Illegal Touching" of the ball within the PA, for a variety of reasons, by the Keeper does NOT yield a PK restart, but rather an IDK at that spot, or if inside the Goal Area on the 6 closest to that spot.

If the Keeper has the ball contact the hand or arm while the entire ball is in fact outside the PA, then the Referee must use that same evaluation as with every other player: did the ball 'play the player' or did the 'player play the ball' with hand, arm, etc.? The amount of time, the distance the ball traveled prior to the contact, the positioning of the limb.....all can factor into that evaluation.....
 

OhioBobcatFan06

Well-known member
With regards to keeper handling outside the box...

Once you decide it is handling, the key consideration becomes if the ball is definitely going in the back of the net in which case it's dogso/red/send-off... If it's not a clear cut goal, then the keeper only gets a yellow. That distinction is not well understood by many.
 

Salad76

Member
With regards to keeper handling outside the box...

Once you decide it is handling, the key consideration becomes if the ball is definitely going in the back of the net in which case it's dogso/red/send-off... If it's not a clear cut goal, then the keeper only gets a yellow. That distinction is not well understood by many.
Never heard that but it does make sense.

Seems most often you see the straight red.
 
NFHS Rule Question: On a corner kick, how close can a defender be to the ball on the kick? Does this limitation change if the offensive team has a player positioned close to the ball to take a short kick?
 
NFHS Rule Question: On a corner kick, how close can a defender be to the ball on the kick? Does this limitation change if the offensive team has a player positioned close to the ball to take a short kick?
The corner kick is the same rule, 11 yards from the flag. There is a corner kick arc with the flag that is 1-yard radius, a mark should be off the field that is 10-yards from that corner kick arc.
 
.
Top