14Red
Well-known member
What makes you think the money is not going to be there in 5 years? There's not been a generation that it's got "worse" for the players.You really are not comprehending this? One last try...
I do not care how much the athletes make. That has nothing to do with it. I care about my favorite team retaining their best players. That is the entire point.
We all know that that the Reds cannot offer massive free agent contracts like LA, NY, Philly, etc. The dollars are just not there. So in order to retain their best players (Elly, for example), they need to get them longer contract extensions that extend beyond their free agent start date.
The only reason a player might sign a contract like that is if you give them a nice salary increase in the years before arbitration and free agency. So you pay a few million more than you need to the first couple years, and ramp up their salary as the contract goes longer, but you keep the salary well below the huge FA contract dollars.
As to your question "IF you could get Elly to sign off, but honestly why would he?", I have answered this many times for you. It is because:
a) He could make 2-3 million extra per year RIGHT NOW
b) He knows he could get hurt and the contract is a tremendous safety net
c) Everyone with half a brain knows that guaranteed money now is way better than "maybe" money 5 years from now
These are the same reasons that Hunter Greene signed.
Is this sinking in yet?
To your point of Elly making 2-3 extra mill per season, could he and Scott Boros decide to make that up in endorsements and other money outside of his baseball contract, and then cash in after 2029?