Me correcting my errors 12 hours later or you commenting on it? Who seems to have the bigger problem?You frequently re-read your own posts 12 hours later? Seems kinda narcissistic to me.
Me correcting my errors 12 hours later or you commenting on it? Who seems to have the bigger problem?You frequently re-read your own posts 12 hours later? Seems kinda narcissistic to me.
Laughing at you does not equate to me having a problem. Good projection though!Me corrected my errors 12 hours later or you commenting on it? Who seems to have the bigger problem?
Oh, I don't know. I think you sell yourself short.Laughing at you does not equate to me having a problem. Good projection though!
Yeah, you clearly don’t have a problemOh, I don't know. I think you sell yourself short.
I would expect that every second of this event will be on video. Public transport (stations, buses, trains) have extensive video systems. In Cleveland, buses and trains have "all angles" videos as well as audio. Any crime on an RTA bus or train or train platform in Cleveland...all on video...with audio.I've not seen it reported where this dude was throwing things at passengers, only that he threw his coat on the ground. Anyone have a link to these eye-witness accounts?
It’s not just murders, it’s violent crime and general menacingNo, it really isn't. New York City murders...
2017 292 (the historic low going back to 1951)
2018 295
2019 319
2020 468
2021 488
2022 438
1990 2245
You’re ignoring him threatening the entire trainI've not seen it reported where this dude was throwing things at passengers, only that he threw his coat on the ground. Anyone have a link to these eye-witness accounts?
OK...I think you're way off. However, I'm open to looking at some data. What do you got that backs up...It’s not just murders, it’s violent crime and general menacing
This latest NYC subway incident is just another glaring example of why you don’t live in cities.
Most big cities in the US let lawlessness rein.
No law enforcement of vagrancy
No law enforcement of open drug use.
No law enforcement of public indecency
These are laws in the books, however police are now hesitant to enforce these laws out of fear they themselves will be prosecuted.
New York City is turning into Gotham and there is no Arkham Asylum
Stay out of these places..
I think you’re in the right church Zunardo. Might even be in the right pew.Oyez, oyez, Zunardo's Court of the Assizes is now in session.
Let's keep things simple here.
Absent any evidence to the contrary, Daniel Penny willingly approached Neely and put him in a chokehold long enough to cause his death. Absent any evidence to the contrary, Penny did not intend to kill Neely, but nevertheless caused his death through his direct action.
Therefore, charge Penny with involuntary manslaughter and get him to plead. Justice is served, and our docket is clear.
I almost feel like Lt. (JG) Daniel Kaffee here.
Your plan, while imminently logical, does not serve the narrative. Further, it will fail to provide the required level of distraction.Oyez, oyez, Zunardo's Court of the Assizes is now in session.
Let's keep things simple here.
Absent any evidence to the contrary, Daniel Penny willingly approached Neely and put him in a chokehold long enough to cause his death. Absent any evidence to the contrary, Penny did not intend to kill Neely, but nevertheless caused his death through his direct action.
Therefore, charge Penny with involuntary manslaughter and get him to plead. Justice is served, and our docket is clear.
I almost feel like Lt. (JG) Daniel Kaffee here.
The context of this discussion with LOTR was specifically around allegations of him assaulting other passengers.You’re ignoring him threatening the entire train
That’s what the people in the sub reddits are sayingOK...I think you're way off. However, I'm open to looking at some data. What do you got that backs up...
"It’s so much worse now than it’s ever been."
No, if he actually was trying to choke him out, he would have choked him out in a minute. 24 yo Green Beret. Get real, and punch yourself.The context of this discussion with LOTR was specifically around allegations of him assaulting other passengers.
Feeling threatened is a subjective experience that's different for everyone. And that shapes your reaction, or lackthereof. You might feel threatened by a dude ranting about not having anything to drink or eat, and his willingness to die or go to jail. Some might roll their eyes, get up, and move to another train. Some might look for security. Or some might sit tight, and see it if escalates to a point where he needs restrained, protect vulnerable passengers, etc. This dude chose to intervene and choke the dude out for like 15 minutes. I'm happy to let this play out and see where the facts land.
There is no data that you will accept, because the other big blue idiots in your Confederacy of Dunces often won't even properly charge, much less prosecute.OK...I think you're way off. However, I'm open to looking at some data. What do you got that backs up...
"It’s so much worse now than it’s ever been."
only 27 people in the last couple of years have been murdered in the subway .....This guy is going to be charged with murder.. There is no right to self defense or defense of others in NYC.
Well, he is a lawyer, after all...There is no data that you will accept, because the other big blue idiots in your Confederacy of Dunces often won't even properly charge, much less prosecute.
You are a disingenuous turd-burglar at heart. You enjoy the practice of deceit, don't you ?
This guy was known to be unhinged, so I wouldn’t take him flying off the handle lightly.The context of this discussion with LOTR was specifically around allegations of him assaulting other passengers.
Feeling threatened is a subjective experience that's different for everyone. And that shapes your reaction, or lackthereof. You might feel threatened by a dude ranting about not having anything to drink or eat, and his willingness to die or go to jail. Some might roll their eyes, get up, and move to another train. Some might look for security. Or some might sit tight, and see it if escalates to a point where he needs restrained, protect vulnerable passengers, etc. This dude chose to intervene and choke the dude out for like 15 minutes. I'm happy to let this play out and see where the facts land.
first white "killer"?only 27 people in the last couple of years have been murdered in the subway .....
at some point , with what has been going on in those subway cars, with people being attacked, and in some cases murdered( 27 in the last couple of years) you would think, that at some point , because it seems people are on their own ... you have to have a sense of, I'll do whatever it takes to protect myself and other people..... instead of just grabbing your phone and videoing people getting the SHAT kicked out of them!!!!Law…
You can’t cause injury or kill someone without a legal excuse...sounds stupidly simple. But you start there. So, what is the legal excuse?
What I’ve read about this…sounds like the deceased is acting in a way that would bother people, and frighten people as to what he MIGHT do. What DID he do? Sounds like not a whole lot. Self defense is THE legal excuse that must be considered. Doesn’t look like self defense to me…of himself or others.
Intent of the Marine? Seems like he doesn’t intend to kill…maybe not even injure. But someone’s dead.
Looks like a manslaughter charge to me.
is that right?first white "killer"?
Face recog would likely put the two men on the train together multiple times, and therefore a known quantity to Penny. The loon should still be alive. The world is probably better without him in it.This guy was known to be unhinged, so I wouldn’t take him flying off the handle lightly.
I was asking youis that right?
I disagree. Penny should not be charged with a crime because in a just society he did not commit a crime. He was carrying out the act of a good Samaritan. It's unfortunate that Neely died as a result of Penny's actions but Neely's death was a direct result of his threatening actions.Oyez, oyez, Zunardo's Court of the Assizes is now in session.
Let's keep things simple here.
Absent any evidence to the contrary, Daniel Penny willingly approached Neely and put him in a chokehold long enough to cause his death. Absent any evidence to the contrary, Penny did not intend to kill Neely, but nevertheless caused his death through his direct action.
Therefore, charge Penny with involuntary manslaughter and get him to plead. Justice is served, and our docket is clear.
I almost feel like Lt. (JG) Daniel Kaffee here.
one of the reasons this turd-burglar always references murder stats is that they tend to be reliable.There is no data that you will accept, because the other big blue idiots in your Confederacy of Dunces often won't even properly charge, much less prosecute.
You are a disingenuous turd-burglar at heart. You enjoy the practice of deceit, don't you ?
Thus depriving him of the right to continue to breathe? Would the Marine have known that?Neely was wanted for punching a 67 lady in the face and sending her to the hospital. Chew on that for a moment.
Gee thanks for the 5th grade civics lesson. To bad it no longer applies to much of the United States. All across America Prosecutors and judges are twisting the law in favor of criminals. Kim Gardner comes to mind as just the latest example:1. The street guy is dead.
2. The Marine killed him; i.e., used deadly force.
3. Law enforcement (police, prosecutors, Grand Jury) of this "community" will decide whether or not to charge the Marine with a crime. Put another way, law enforcement of this community will decide whether or not there was a legal excuse for the Marine to use deadly force on this street guy.
4. If law enforcement decides to charge the Marine with some sort of offense (murder/manslaughter, etc.), a jury of local citizens (people who LIVE in that community) will decide whether or not to convict the Marine. Was there a legal excuse to kill the street guy? If self defense, was the use of deadly force REASONABLE? If a "citizen's arrest" type scenario, was deadly force appropriate due to a REASONABLE belief that deadly force was going to be exerted by the street guy? What is REASONABLE will be decided by the citizens of the borough of Manhattan...urban residents, subway riders, street people encounterers...
Platitudes and speculation from outsiders won't decide this case. The citizens of the borough of Manhattan, who live there, who experience urban living on the subway, on the streets of Manhattan...they will decide what is reasonable. Fair, no? Would be fair in Hamilton County, Cuyahoga County, Holmes County.