Since Whitmer had a strong enough program to absorb the blow of vouchers dumbarses believe it legitamizes their use.
The TCL allowed the private schools to arse rape them for years. One TPS AD even acted like he enjoyed it. The NLL and TRAC publics will not. There will be no more Mr. Nice Guy with the private schools, especially CC, which has gamed the system brilliantly. They should have fun scheduling freshman games in Cleveland and Detroit on Wednesday nights. Probably have to charge more for tailgate parking.
I may have asked this before, but can't find the old thread or remember the explanation - What is the financial impact to the school district that losses a student with a "voucher" to a private vs "open enrollment" to a public?
Put another way what is the financial impact to TPS losing a student to Central vs losing to Whitmer?
Not talking at a macro level argument of public dollars staying in the public system etc. Just dollars and cents for the school district losing the student.
I assume that both have a negative financial impact - maybe one less than the other - but if both cause any harm then why not argue against both practices? Right is right wrong is wrong regardless of "degree of wrongness" or should I be looking at this from a different perspective?