Raider6309
Well-known member
The Democrats just became the biggest supporters of Trump. Now I get 5 more years of him. Thanks dipsticks
So you answer to derpVI?I think we all know the answer to that. I actually don’t have a huge issue with it. As much as I hate him, Mike Pence is likely worse.
Wait a minute....what am I saying? No. I take that back.
Without the Articles, the Senate has no need to plan for a trial. Until the Senate produces a plan, Pelosi will not give them the Articles.Crafty Nancy is saying she is not sending the articles to the Senate until the trial process is outlined. Say what you want about her politics but she is shrewd.
So the Senate wont even have to waste a day voting it down. Awesome.Crafty Nancy is saying she is not sending the articles to the Senate until the trial process is outlined. Say what you want about her politics but she is shrewd.
The juvenile crap does not bother me. In fact, I don’t even know what that means nor do I care in the slightest. If you are amused, I’m glad.So you answer to derpVI?
So if the Senate just moves on and does not outline the trial process guess this one can officially be put behind us.Crafty Nancy is saying she is not sending the articles to the Senate until the trial process is outlined. Say what you want about her politics but she is shrewd.
Yup...but why would she even want a sham trial? Just sitting on the articles will have the exact same effect as what Mitch is proposing. Why bother? Pretty smart I think.Without the Articles, the Senate has no need to plan for a trial. Until the Senate produces a plan, Pelosi will not give them the Articles.
The country is in impeachment limbo.
All for show.
Yup...and I think she would be fine with that vs a sham trial.So if the Senate just moves on and does not outline the trial process guess this one can officially be put behind us.
And proves it is a complete waste of time and resources.Yup...and I think she would be fine with that vs a sham trial.
It’s never going to be put behind us. It’ll be a constant theme brought up in 2020. I can already see it playing out in the ads.So if the Senate just moves on and does not outline the trial process guess this one can officially be put behind us.
The Democrats just became the biggest supporters of Trump. Now I get 5 more years of him. Thanks dipsticks
Not really. Everybody knows that the Senate will not remove. That is not the barometer for what the House does so she has completed her piece of the process. If the Senate is not going to uphold their oath on the Trial, there is no reason for her to validate it. She can just sit on the articles and get the same result she was always going to get. It seems to me that there is more value to Trump to get an acquittal vs it just sitting out there unresolved. Super smart.And proves it is a complete waste of time and resources.
Of course you do.Why bother? Pretty smart I think.
Smart? Not seeing it.Not really. Everybody knows that the Senate will not remove. That is not the barometer for what the House does so she has completed her piece of the process. If the Senate is not going to uphold their oath on the Trial, there is no reason for her to validate it. She can just sit on the articles and get the same result she was always going to get. It seems to me that there is more value to Trump to get an acquittal vs it just sitting out there unresolved. Super smart.
They will do what they always do, lie to us.And what do the Dems do now?
I love the logic. By not completing the task, she's completed her piece. You all are real pieces of work.That is not the barometer for what the House does so she has completed her piece of the process.
Maybe she could occupy herself with that bag of while she waits ?LOL okay.
Its exposing this is a sham impeachment. Not a good look.Yup...but why would she even want a sham trial? Just sitting on the articles will have the exact same effect as what Mitch is proposing. Why bother? Pretty smart I think.
And what do the Dems do now?
I don't know her service record but as a politician she's a coward. I'd have more respect for her if she just followed the other Democrats but stating there wasn't evidence for impeachment then why didn't she vote NAY? Instead she turns yellow and votes present. Weak!Tulsi Gabbard votes present?
Fixed your post.Crafty Nancy is saying she is not sending the articles to the Senate until the trial process is outlined. Say what you want about her politics but she is a shrew.
Worked for Obama.I don't know her service record but as a politician she's a coward. I'd have more respect for her if she just followed the other Democrats but stating there wasn't evidence for impeachment then why didn't she vote NAY? Instead she turns yellow and votes present. Weak!