Crusaders
Moderator
and if we don't snap the ball over our QB's head on the first drive for a DEF score then maybe we win by 10. but if "if's and but's were candy and nuts"
i love the "poor play calling". i saw one, which was calling play action in your own endzone, that was a bad call. otherwise they moved the ball pretty well. turning it over doesn't help at all. but go ahead and sit home on your couch and keep thinking you know exactly what play to call, when to call it, and you could get this team to execute it perfectly every time, because that's basically the type of fan you are - 20/20 hindsight, monday morning quarterback from your couch - you have all the answers....................after a play doesn't work.
and you distort the facts with your stats on Gurley. he had a 22 yd run. take that away and he's 11 for 51 at a 4.6 yd avg. that's not shredding the defense. Steelers have shown that you can't just line up and run at them at will. they are only giving up 3.9 yards per carry for the season.
like i said, doesn't matter what the Steelers do. we could win the Super Bowl with this team this season and you would still want Tomlin fired. it's absurd.
How in your mind does are those two things analogous? A coach being fixated on his QB to the detriment of his team's success is not at all the same as a bad play.
Yes, poor play-calling. The play-action in the end-zone was just one - and it came straight from Tomlin. Another, and it also doubles as poor time management, was an entire sequence right before the half that needlessly gave the Rams another opportunity to score. Dumb. Coaching.
Why do you get to eliminate one run? Do you watch the NFL? RBs typically have a bunch of 1-4yard carries interspersed with a few big carries. If That's how it goes. It's almost never just a constant stream of 6-7 yard runs. And 4.6 yards per carry at 25 carries is what, genius? 115 yards. That's a pretty solid day in the NFL. If the Gurley himself had 115 yards, the Rams probably win that game. But going by how he actually ran, he would had likely hit 150.
This team could have gone 4-12 and you'd be in here talking about what a great job he did without Ben.
You're a joke. A moron who can't think.
Last edited: