So the plan is to go young, let the kids play. Why in the world would you go out and spend money on veterans to just clog up the pipeline??
They’re going to have to spend next year if they want to be a legit competitor. The pipeline isn’t going to fill up an entire major league roster.
The best-case scenario for 2024 is that young guys competently fill the following spots:
DH: Stephenson/Encarnacion-Strand
1B: Stephenson/Encarnacion-Strand
2B: India
SS: McLain
3B: Marte
CF: De La Cruz
LF: Fraley
Utility: Steer, Barrero
Backup OF: Benson (maybe starter in RF if he breaks through?)
SP: Greene, Lodolo, Ashcraft, Williamson
RP: Diaz, Sanmartin, Sims, Santillan
By my count, if you want a really good team, you’ll have to buy a catcher, right fielder, starting pitcher, and significant bullpen help. And that assumes that all these young ballyhooed prospects become legit useful to good major-leaguers pretty quickly, which it’s unlikely to hit on 100% of them being successful.
Will ownership roll out the checkbook for true impact free agents or will they say, “Well, fans aren’t coming to the games and local TV money is up in the air, so we have to keep payroll low”?
Plus, if the team gets into contention, will the team aggressively add payroll at the deadline or go cheap like every other trade deadline in this ownership group’s tenure when the Reds had a playoff chance? If I remember correctly, Jonathan Broxton is the biggest deadline addition in the Castellini era.
It’s true, it’s true. Trust me …