touche'.You can always tell an Ohio football fan, you just can't tell them anything. Steeler, you nailed it square on the head.
St. Xavier 38, Miami Northwestern 12
- Thread starter skyway28
- Start date
touche'.You can always tell an Ohio football fan, you just can't tell them anything. Steeler, you nailed it square on the head.
You and I know hindsight is always 20/20. Concha knows this as well.He peerless playing devils advocate.I really believe Concha is an attorney
WoodyHayes
homesick
Anyone see ESPN
They showed a few highlights of X and Colerain and Corso added MWN is number 1.
They showed a few highlights of X and Colerain and Corso added MWN is number 1.
BobcatBomber
Well-known member
And so is good out of state competition. Just because a team is out of state doesn't make them "better." DeMatha came to cincy and got it handed to them by St. X...but DeMatha "was a pretender" some say, even though they were nationally ranked at the time of the game.
Maybe if other states had as much talent as Ohio does in state they wouldn't need to travel out of state to find competition. :shrug: See how that works? I can make baseless claims too. Bottom line is this: X has run the table on what is arguably one of the toughest schedules in the country and is ranked right there with MNW. While I don't claim to know who would win, stating X would stand no chance is just silly.
consumerman
New member
St X had an easy argument saying it can play with anyone in the country
no question about it
however that can apparently be said with several if not many other teams nationwide
congrats on a great season so far and two more rounds of playoffs
no question about it
however that can apparently be said with several if not many other teams nationwide
congrats on a great season so far and two more rounds of playoffs
Moron,
Who was criticizing a schedule in hindsight?
DLS either plays a tough schedule this year or they don't. They don't. They may have tried to schedule one, they may have not tried. Irrelevant. It isn't tough.
DLS's opponents this year have PLAYED one more game than X's opponents HAVE WON.
Get it through your dimwitted skull:
DLS's opponents barely breaking .500 is reality, not hindsight.
I saw Lowndes play a couple of years ago when they were ranked #1 or #2 in GA to start the season. They played GA power Parkview. Saw the game with a buddy of mine (DLS fan from California). We couldn't believe how bad it was.
Lakeland was supposed to roll X. Run rings around them. Ask the Lakeland players of their opinion of Ohio ball.
BTW, do you think X never plays teams with big o-lines? Glenville averages well over 300 pounds across the line. DeMatha was big also. The GCL and Colerain usually average at least 270-280 if not more.
X's opponents this year are 107-42.
MNW's are 54-59.
Nobody doubts that MNW is really good, but throwing crap at X after having to show up and beat teams that typically had just one or two losses in a normal week is asinine.
MNW and DLS haven't had to show up every week versus anything remotely like what X has. And X has done it without one of the nation's top RB prospects for several games and minus the starting senior QB for several others.
X has walked the walk.
Others are just talking the talk.
consumerman
New member
DLS has outscored its opponents 317-14 in the first half this year
that is just talk right concha-diction
consumerman
New member
how is saying stx is great this year and can play with anyone tranlate to "throwing crap" at them
you CANT READ
you just want to argue even when the post gives you no reason
god what a tiresome blowhard you are
consumerman
New member
i guess those 1-2 loss team are inclusive
EXCEPT
5 Loss St Eds
5 Loss LaSalle
4 loss Elder
4 loss Moeller
4 loss Elder again
how can anyone not see all these 1-2 loss teams
EXCEPT
5 Loss St Eds
5 Loss LaSalle
4 loss Elder
4 loss Moeller
4 loss Elder again
how can anyone not see all these 1-2 loss teams
consumerman
New member
Moron,
Who was criticizing a schedule in hindsight?
namecalling is the greatest debating skill you have mr contradiction I mean concha-diction
and the answer to your question is YOU
you even did it in your response post
are you that bi-polar?
Who was criticizing a schedule in hindsight?
namecalling is the greatest debating skill you have mr contradiction I mean concha-diction
and the answer to your question is YOU
you even did it in your response post
are you that bi-polar?
13 games
Apart from X:
DeMatha 1 loss
Glenville 2 losses
Trinity 1 loss
Chatard 2 losses
Elder 2 losses (2x)
Iggy 2 losses
Centerville 2 losses
Colerain 0 losses
9 of 13 games
Apart from losses to X, X's opponents are 104-29. How about DLS's?
Oh, for the love of Pete.
DLS has played a tough schedule this year:
A) Yes
B) No
The question isn't "Did they TRY to schedule tough or weak". That is IRRELEVANT. The 2007 schedule turned out tough or not so tough, which is it? Screw your silly hindsight whining. Tough. Not tough. Reality. What did it turn out to be?
It is not name calling. It is called "an accurate description".
consumerman
New member
who has performed better
has St X outscored their opponents 317-14 in the first half
REPEAT REPEAT REPEAT
DLS has performed better
St X has a more impressive schedule
who is to say who is better?
GO AWAY conch-diction
and you call me one more name and I will toast your ---
has St X outscored their opponents 317-14 in the first half
REPEAT REPEAT REPEAT
DLS has performed better
St X has a more impressive schedule
who is to say who is better?
GO AWAY conch-diction
and you call me one more name and I will toast your ---
consumerman
New member
which st x opponent was a team that beat 5 LEAGUE CHAMPIONS?
Did DLS crunch MV by 28, a team that BEAT one of your so-called GCL powers?
BTW, MV won 5 of 10 games in California but BEAT a GCL PlAYOFF WINNING TEAM THAT YOU PROP UP AS A ST X TOUGH OPPONENT
how does that tatse mr cherry picker?
go away mr argument troll
Did DLS crunch MV by 28, a team that BEAT one of your so-called GCL powers?
BTW, MV won 5 of 10 games in California but BEAT a GCL PlAYOFF WINNING TEAM THAT YOU PROP UP AS A ST X TOUGH OPPONENT
how does that tatse mr cherry picker?
go away mr argument troll
WoodyHayes
homesick
X is very good
They are very good. I listened to the Colerain game and they kept saying a Colerain wide receiver was blowing past the X defenders. This could present some problems but X ball control may keep the fast receivers off the field if they played MNW. I would have no problem for either one of them to be number 1. Both are very good.
They are very good. I listened to the Colerain game and they kept saying a Colerain wide receiver was blowing past the X defenders. This could present some problems but X ball control may keep the fast receivers off the field if they played MNW. I would have no problem for either one of them to be number 1. Both are very good.
consumerman
New member
Mr Concha-Diction
I thought you might have learned from your mistake on bashing DLS and california football teams on california chat boards all those years ago now that DLS and others have come to Ohio and beat 3 Ohio power teams
I will give you some advice
chill
calm down
take a pill
get some physical exercise, that actually helps people with mental issues
dont overreact
quit reacting like debating high school football challenges your manhood
accept the fact that others recognize ohio has great football
start recognizing that other states also have great football
quit the namecalling, if you are anywhere smart you will realize that hurts your credibility
try FOR ONCE accepting and recognizing another school or another state's accomplishments
dont always try to nitpick them (while cherry picking your own team and state)
dont overeact to this post, just print it out. take a few minutes, refelct on it, then maybe consider the advice
R E L A X BRO
its only a hs football chat board
I thought you might have learned from your mistake on bashing DLS and california football teams on california chat boards all those years ago now that DLS and others have come to Ohio and beat 3 Ohio power teams
I will give you some advice
chill
calm down
take a pill
get some physical exercise, that actually helps people with mental issues
dont overreact
quit reacting like debating high school football challenges your manhood
accept the fact that others recognize ohio has great football
start recognizing that other states also have great football
quit the namecalling, if you are anywhere smart you will realize that hurts your credibility
try FOR ONCE accepting and recognizing another school or another state's accomplishments
dont always try to nitpick them (while cherry picking your own team and state)
dont overeact to this post, just print it out. take a few minutes, refelct on it, then maybe consider the advice
R E L A X BRO
its only a hs football chat board
consumerman
New member
last time I checked 26 points beat 22
Is it different where you live?
or are you gonna fall for that ineligble player who played 2 plays on special teams?
who won on the field?
BobcatBomber
Well-known member
Yeah, cheating is frowned up here. Is it different where you live?
consumerman
New member
take it and run with it
a team that won 5 of 10 games in cali beat a gcl playoff winning team
then had to forfeit because of a technicality on pw
yeah he was an all american right?
moeller would have won right?
lmao
enjoy your forfeit win
PS I did enjoy the whining crybaby st x radio announcers who complained FOUR TIMES in the FIRST QUARTER about officiating IN A GAME THEY WERE LEADING
OMG
consumerman
New member
Fightingfor7crusader
Active member
If Moeller played the way they did against X for the first 3 quarters, Mission Viejo would've has their ----- handed to them. Moeller showed that they were dominant after Mission Viejo got to quick scores. If Moeller's players and coaches played the way they did in the end of the first and the whole second quarters for the whole game then it woudln't have been a game. Even with Moeller's players giving up those two early scores Moe still could have won easily, but uber-conservative play calling in the second half cost them the game. I know it's "if", but I honestly believe Moe beats MV 9 out of 10 times and cleans their clocks 4 out of 10 times. This is one of the least talented Moeller teams in history, they won games on heart and determination not talent. Although it was a big down year for MV as well I still believe Moeller would have beaten them last year as well. Moeller defense had way more talent last year.
Moellers average size of dbs 2006 - 6'1" 180 2007 - 5'11" 175
Moellers average 40 of dbs 2006 - 4.6 2007 - 4.6
Moellers average size of lbs 2006 - 6' 205 2007 - 6' 190
Moellers average 40 of lbs 2006 - 4.7-4.8 2007 - 4.9
Moeller average size of dl 2006 - 6'3" 265 2007 - 6'2" 215
Moellers average size of dl 2006 - 4.8-4.9 2007 - 5.0-5.1
Moellers average size of dbs 2006 - 6'1" 180 2007 - 5'11" 175
Moellers average 40 of dbs 2006 - 4.6 2007 - 4.6
Moellers average size of lbs 2006 - 6' 205 2007 - 6' 190
Moellers average 40 of lbs 2006 - 4.7-4.8 2007 - 4.9
Moeller average size of dl 2006 - 6'3" 265 2007 - 6'2" 215
Moellers average size of dl 2006 - 4.8-4.9 2007 - 5.0-5.1
Last edited:
consumerman
New member
MV won 5 of ten games in california
they have been as high as NATIONAL #2 rankings
these are not 30 years agi
this was as recently as 2004 and 2005
this MV team was the worst team since spongebob came to MV
yet THEY beat a GCL playoff team
you cant trhow out two TD in the first 5 minutes and say we outplayed you
that is like a pitcher who gave up two grand slams in the first inning and says after the first inning we outplayed you
the game is 4 q
mv did more in the 4 q than moeller did
any way you slice it
mv traveled 2000 miles, a huge advanatge for moeller
moeller had a chance to win
they didnt
get over it
BobcatBomber
Well-known member
It's not my forfeit win. I have no affiliation with the Moeller program or school. Had MV followed the rules, yes, they would have won the game. But they didn't. Who's fault is that? Certainly not Moeller's. I don't enjoy the win. Just pointing out facts.
At the end of the day, where does the W and L rest for that game?
Guess what, Spirrow Agnew was President!
In another post, several years ago you stated you saw Pukeview-Camden at the Kell kickoff classic"They were slow, and just kept running the ball nowhere".Could be you watched two teams talented enough to take each other out of their game plan and have to play defense. Take off the rose colored glasses counselor. I felt the same when seeing Iggy, Elder, and Princton,St Eds, Mentor and quite a few other Ohio, and PA teams.. I notice you avoid GAVSV.Old Rabid would love to discuss this with you as well.He's waiting to chew your ears off and spit them back in your face. Lowndes would love to host any so-called name program who wants to roll the dice.Other than ST.X, the Vikings would defeat any GCL team this year.
Pukeview played Lowndes in 2004 in the finals.Early onset of Alzheimers? And btw why are you living in Georgia? Couldn't make it back in the hometown?
Last edited:
If is the largest two letter word in the English language. "If" frogs had hammers mounted on their tails, they wouldn't be afraid of snakes.
Last edited:
Actually several other states do have as much or more talent than Ohio.I do see how it works.You invite teams to come in and play, catch them in your backyard with your officials.When you win it then goes "See we told you we are better".
When your teams lose to the invited gueast that has traveled from afar you boys then denigrate that same team that you were raving about beforehand.
'Oh it was a rebuilding year", "Why were they invited"? Always an excuse.Or series of them.So juvenile.
I do feel that St.X is a fine team and Specht an excellent coach. Rasso laid the foundation though and he has run with it.
Could X beat MNW? Of course they could.At Nippert or wherever(Lockland), yes it could happen. Way down in Gator country where we eat Buckeyes like candy, very unlikely.