Stirred not Shaken
Well-known member
AgreeJust leave it alone.
AgreeJust leave it alone.
Unfortunately it looks like a number of vocal schools have the ear of those in charge. Many of them I hear about are small rural schools and D1 schools with less then 550 enrollments. So this could mean that a majority of the schools are okay with the current system.Just leave it alone.
Competitive balance is a waste of time. For the amount of time AD's spend tracking and entering the information, there are very few teams moving up/down a division as a result.I think people need to realize that only 5 play at a time in basketball which tends to "equalize" some of the size disparity noted by several posters when comparing it to the sport of football. They had three divisions (A/AA/AAA) and went to I/II/III/IV. IMO, expanding further is strictly a "money grab" by the OHSAA! Of course, that doesn't address the insidious recruiting issue, so some version of competitive balance formula should be actively considered.
I would disagree with very few moving (I guess depends on definition of very few) but agree 100% that it has had zero impact compared to the time it takes administratively.Competitive balance is a waste of time. For the amount of time AD's spend tracking and entering the information, there are very few teams moving up/down a division as a result.
How would you play a state tournament with 6 divisions? If that happens they will do like football and soccer and only play the 6 finals in the same spot. The semi-finals in each division would be played separately. No way you can fit 24 games in at one facility....unless you start the tourney on Tuesday....which likely isn't going to happen2 Private. 4 Public. I just brought the state tournament back. And the crowds would be back and roaring... for 2/3 of the games
I mentioned this to a local district tournament site manager the other night. Any expansion to more divisions would almost certainly require an extra day and/or a second venue. Assuming that UD will continue to host First Four games...then what do you do? Bring Wright St into the fold? Logistically, this isn't as simple as it sounds.How would you play a state tournament with 6 divisions? If that happens they will do like football and soccer and only play the 6 finals in the same spot. The semi-finals in each division would be played separately. No way you can fit 24 games in at one facility....unless you start the tourney on Tuesday....which likely isn't going to happen
In response to both of you, 6 divisions would mean only state final games at Dayton.I mentioned this to a local district tournament site manager the other night. Any expansion to more divisions would almost certainly require an extra day and/or a second venue. Assuming that UD will continue to host First Four games...then what do you do? Bring Wright St into the fold? Logistically, this isn't as simple as it sounds.
& in theory, could be played in 1 day. It would be tight and illogical, but never doubt the penny pinchers..In response to both of you, 6 divisions would mean only state final games at Dayton.
This would be the end of the state tourney. Attendance is awful now If they had 2 games going at the same time at two different locations you would starts seeing games with attendance well under 5,000. It's still crazy to think that there were years at St John Arena where ever game was a sell out and you couldn't touch a scalped ticket for less than $20.....and in the early years of the tourney at the Schott where they regularly got 15,000 plus.I mentioned this to a local district tournament site manager the other night. Any expansion to more divisions would almost certainly require an extra day and/or a second venue. Assuming that UD will continue to host First Four games...then what do you do? Bring Wright St into the fold? Logistically, this isn't as simple as it sounds.
It's my understanding in talking to a few coaches that the coaches association has been pushing the expansion.I think people need to realize that only 5 play at a time in basketball which tends to "equalize" some of the size disparity noted by several posters when comparing it to the sport of football. They had three divisions (A/AA/AAA) and went to I/II/III/IV. IMO, expanding further is strictly a "money grab" by the OHSAA! Of course, that doesn't address the insidious recruiting issue, so some version of competitive balance formula should be actively considered.
Because in football you need atleast 11 guys on the field at all times. Depth matters more in football than any other sport. Having more boys to pick from matters more when you’re playing a sport that requires more bodies. Basketball on the other hand you only need 5 on the floor and I’ve seen a lot of teams literally use 6 the entire game, a school with 50 boys can compete with a school that has 1000 if they can find 2 or 3 true studs, in football that’s never the case.This really hits the nail on the head well. Why the hell do we have so many more divisions in football than pretty much every sport?
D1 for basketball is essentially D1-large D3 in football combined. Could you imagine the controversy if that existed?
D2 is small D3 - some of D5
D3 is most of D5-D6
D4 is essentially D7
I dont care what the understanding is lol they just shouldnt go to 7 divisions because the Brecksvilles of the world cant break throughGive me 1 division or an open division where all the top teams regardless of division can opt in and compete. Keep D1- D4 but just make an understanding that the true state champion is the open division champion.
Has less to do with Brecksville and more to do with these D3, D4 schools mad at schools like Richmond and Lue. Thats the reality of it.I dont care what the understanding is lol they just shouldnt go to 7 divisions because the Brecksvilles of the world cant break through
You can add in the smaller D1 schools who use the 1,000+ enrollment schools as an excuse for their tournament losses.Has less to do with Brecksville and more to do with these D3, D4 schools mad at schools like Richmond and Lue. Thats the reality of it.
Yep they are definitely having their say this go around too. Which also makes me think we are probably talking about a done deal alreadyYou can add in the smaller D1 schools who use the 1,000+ enrollment schools as an excuse for their tournament losses.
Think this is a valid "excuse" though. In D1 in Southwest Ohio, we rarely ever see the smaller end of D1 schools make it to Districts. No other division has the gap that D1 has. Over the last 10 years, there has been 6 smaller D1s make it to Districts, with 3 being Wilmington with the Cumberlands.You can add in the smaller D1 schools who use the 1,000+ enrollment schools as an excuse for their tournament losses.
With this, depending on the location of D1 teams, you could have major travel or teams playing their first game as for a District title. I know football may do this but they play one game a week.My suggestion based on 800 boys hoops schools
7 divisions
D1 64 teams
D2 96 teams
D3-7 128 teams (any deviation can result in less teams in D7)
Teams can choose to play up but not choose to play down. If a team chooses to play up, a team drops based on enrollment to keep the numbers even
4 day state tournament at 2 nearby sites for semis doubleheader sessions
D5-7 semis on Thursday
D1-4 semis on Friday
D5-7 finals Friday (one site)
D1-4 finals Saturday (one site)