If the primary reason for expanding is to bring the teams-per-division closer to what football has, then yes, that makes sense.It’s happening. Not just basketball either, all team sports are about to see an explosion in divisions.
The goal is to decrease the overall enrollment disparity within divisions. It’ll break down like this- d1, 64 schools. D2, 64 schools. D3-7, an even split of the remaining schools.If the primary reason for expanding is to bring the teams-per-division closer to what football has, then yes, that makes sense.
Football has 701 schools across 7 divisions (70 in Division I, 105 in Divisions II-VII).
VOLLEYBALL:
View attachment 49111
BASEBALL:
View attachment 49112
SOFTBALL:
View attachment 49113
What makes you think they or any school would willing move up divisions?Let do 5 and a team can choose to move up. Richmond heights would elect to go D1, SVSM, LUE, and all the other teams people belly ache about. Could you imagine 6-7 championship games. The state would only be championship games and no semi finals. There has to be better solutions.
For D1 and D2, each, that’s six games to win a state title. 64 > 32 > 16 > 8 > 4 > 2The goal is to decrease the overall enrollment disparity within divisions. It’ll break down like this- d1, 64 schools. D2, 64 schools. D3-7, an even split of the remaining schools.
The second round is the district championship.....For D1 and D2, each, that’s six games to win a state title. 64 > 32 > 16 > 8 > 4 > 2
So, would this mean the district stage of the tournament for the future D1 and D2 become obsolete? And it becomes four regions of sixteen?
I’m aware.The second round is the district championship.....
Let do 5 and a team can choose to move up. Richmond heights would elect to go D1, SVSM, LUE, and all the other teams people belly ache about. Could you imagine 6-7 championship games. The state would only be championship games and no semi finals. There has to be better solutions.
I just think they would move up.What makes you think they or any school would willing move up divisions?
I just think they move up. We can agree to disagree on that pointWhat makes you think Richmond Heights would elect to go up? What's the motivation for them? To face better competition? They already do that in the regular season. Staying in D4 is a guaranteed way to win a State Title. There's a reason these AAU type coaches cling to smaller schools, they know their shot at a state title is exponentially higher in D4-D3 compared to D1.
In terms of the topic at hand... I know people won't like it, but it makes sense. Nearly 100 more schools have Basketball than Football in Ohio, yet Football has 7 divisions and Basketball has 4? As soon as Football expanded to the 7th division this was inevitable.
The gap in the D1 schools is truly too much of a gap. There's a good case to be made that the D1 schools need split. I'd imagine they'll add another one and we'll see 6 divisions as soon as next season.
Is it also a money grab for more tournament games / tournament revenue for the OHSAA? Definitely. Smaller towns typically provide a very good gate, thus more $ for OHSAA. But I also think they have enough reasoning and arguments to push this through.
It wouldn’t be more tournament games. It’s the same number of tournament games. It will probably lose money, unless state title attendance greatly increases, as now they have to rent the biggest venues for more games.What makes you think Richmond Heights would elect to go up? What's the motivation for them? To face better competition? They already do that in the regular season. Staying in D4 is a guaranteed way to win a State Title. There's a reason these AAU type coaches cling to smaller schools, they know their shot at a state title is exponentially higher in D4-D3 compared to D1.
In terms of the topic at hand... I know people won't like it, but it makes sense. Nearly 100 more schools have Basketball than Football in Ohio, yet Football has 7 divisions and Basketball has 4? As soon as Football expanded to the 7th division this was inevitable.
The gap in the D1 schools is truly too much of a gap. There's a good case to be made that the D1 schools need split. I'd imagine they'll add another one and we'll see 6 divisions as soon as next season.
Is it also a money grab for more tournament games / tournament revenue for the OHSAA? Definitely. Smaller towns typically provide a very good gate, thus more $ for OHSAA. But I also think they have enough reasoning and arguments to push this through.
Maybe a little bit more money but not enough to justify splitting I think.It wouldn’t be more tournament games. It’s the same number of tournament games. It will probably lose money, unless state title attendance greatly increases, as now they have to rent the biggest venues for more games.
For D1 and D2, each, that’s six games to win a state title. 64 > 32 > 16 > 8 > 4 > 2
So, would this mean the district stage of the tournament for the future D1 and D2 become obsolete? And it becomes four regions of sixteen?
What had sprung to mind is some athletic districts, like the NW, may only have 1 or 3 teams in a new D1. Whitmer is the only school that will have the raw numbers to consistently be in the top 64 of enrollment on the boys basketball side. Findlay and Perrysburg are both the 59th and 60th largest, currently.The second round is the district championship.....
It wouldn’t be more tournament games. It’s the same number of tournament games. It will probably lose money, unless state title attendance greatly increases, as now they have to rent the biggest venues for more games.