Questions on Region 4 playoffs

DLS looks really good this year. Too bad they don't face anybody that anyone anywhere holds in high regard. It's real shame to have a team that good but have to beat up on cupcakes all year.

yeah too bad they did not get the same schedule they have had in other years

#1 LB Poly (2001)
#2 LB Poly (2002)
#2 Mater Dei (1998)
18 time state champ St. Louis (2002)
9 time state champ Evangel (2003)
2 national top ten teams (2004)
#3 Mission Viejo (2004)
#2 Mission Viejo (2005)

yeah DLS ducks any good teams, any fool knows that

(read that last line carefully concha, the key word is word #8)
 
most of iggys accomplishments were done 15 or more years ago

what does that have to do with 2007 in which they lost a game by 21 points?

as for sophomore quareterbacks

you better look up Matt Gutierrez at DLS

In 1999, in his third start he threw for 300 yards and 6 TD against Matt Leinart and Mater Dei

do some research next time

DLS went undefeated and did not have to excuse away 3 overtime 3 point wins a gainst a 3 loss team

Iggy has three losses to teams with a combined 31-4 record. All three are still in the playoffs, I believe. Schedules like Iggy's are alien to Cali folk.


As regards Gutierrez, try to stay on topic, lad.

I'm guessing he was picked to start that year and thus had the preseason and 2 games under his belt. Leinart was a QB, so I'm not sure of the relevance to Gutierrez' performance.

So, it wasn't Gutierrez' first start. Try to let that sink in. And I think it's a fair bet that the game day weather didn't involve 30+ mph wind gusts.

Excellent effort at being completely irrelevant with your response.
 
let's complie the stx vs st Ig excuses

1) we had to travel 200 miles (boo hoo)
2) it was an away game in cleveland (waaa)
3) we had to start a soph QB in his first start (boo hoo)
4) the team we played used to be good 15 years ago (waaaa)
5) it was windy (lmao, i mean waaaaa)
6) the other team plays good defense, particularly run defense (gee too bad)
7) although we can say we had good stats, the RESULT of the game was a 3 point win over a 3 loss team in 3 overtimes (waaaa)

now let's get to the excuses left out
1) the refs blew some calls
2) we outplayed them by a huge a margin, the score doesn't reflect that
3) those damn special teams cost us
4) that kick was good (not good) - combined #1 and #3
5) our coach is too conservative
6) the ball bounced the wrong way for us
7) we are better than we played, we play much better at the end of our season
8) our record isn't as bad as it looks, cuz we play teams that used to be good
9) although we lost, if we played again we would win I just know it

oops, these second set of excuses are for moeller, sorry
 
Iggy has three losses to teams with a combined 31-4 record. All three are still in the playoffs, I believe. Schedules like Iggy's are alien to Cali folk.


As regards Gutierrez, try to stay on topic, lad.

I'm guessing he was picked to start that year and thus had the preseason and 2 games under his belt. Leinart was a QB, so I'm not sure of the relevance to Gutierrez' performance.

So, it wasn't Gutierrez' first start. Try to let that sink in. And I think it's a fair bet that the game day weather didn't involve 30+ mph wind gusts.

Excellent effort at being completely irrelevant with your response.


i think gutierrez had three completions after his first two games

you are right he was a seasoned passer after 3 passes
 
Servite beat a 9-1 Orange Lutheran that was nationally ranked

who did Moeller beat that was better than that??????

How good is Lutheran? I mean, Servite is 1-2 against the three apparently good teams they've played. But Servite beat them. And Lutheran's non-league schedule? What does that prove?
 
Iggy has three losses to teams with a combined 31-4 record

one was glenville

who lost to a cali team

(like moeller and like elder)
 
What possible connection is there between MV beating Moe and St. X playing Ignatius? Try to make some sense.

YOU are the one that said plaqying in Cleveland (200 miles away) was an EXCUSE for ST X barely beating St iggy

I think a 500 mile road trip and a 2000 mile raod trip are much tougher, yet the cali teams won those games without making 4-5 excuses

No. It is a reasonable cause in combination with having a newbie at quarterback and 30+ mph winds. Nice cherry-picking. Try looking at arguments in their totality next time.
 
How good is Lutheran? I mean, Servite is 1-2 against the three apparently good teams they've played. But Servite beat them. And Lutheran's non-league schedule? What does that prove?

i have seen lutheran twice

the div 2 bowl game last year and this year on tv

they have big aggressive players and a strong passing game and a go-for-it coach

i think they are excellent

i was surprised servite beat them
 
i put it along with the ridiculous some utah team hung 32 on them (without mentioning they scored 50)

Of course you do. Anyone out there surprised? I mean, they've lost to the national #2 and the MW #5 ranked teams. So they must be weak.

But dropping 32 points at home to a Utah team with three in-state Utah losses is rock solid performance. LMAO.
 
concha you are the same guy who FOR YEARS came to cali boards and said dls doesnt play anybody and cali sucks and if cali teams came to ohio they would get big losses from real powerful ohio teams

i would state as evidence:

dls over elder
MV over Moeller
LB Polyover Glenville



your habit of trying to add bold type to each line as a response when actually you say virtually nothing doesnt fool anyone

here is an example of your great debating skills and strategy:

DLS beat MV by 28 [And?]
wow provocative!

how could i ever respond
 
yeah too bad they did not get the same schedule they have had in other years

#1 LB Poly (2001)
#2 LB Poly (2002)
#2 Mater Dei (1998)
18 time state champ St. Louis (2002)
9 time state champ Evangel (2003)
2 national top ten teams (2004)
#3 Mission Viejo (2004)
#2 Mission Viejo (2005)

yeah DLS ducks any good teams, any fool knows that

(read that last line carefully concha, the key word is word #8)

Knows is the key word? OK. I have no idea why, but if it matters to you, that's all that is important.

Nice history there. Irrelevant (this word pops up alot with you) to 2007, but impressive nonetheless.
 
let's complie the stx vs st Ig excuses

1) we had to travel 200 miles (boo hoo)
2) it was an away game in cleveland (waaa)
3) we had to start a soph QB in his first start (boo hoo)
4) the team we played used to be good 15 years ago (waaaa)
5) it was windy (lmao, i mean waaaaa)
6) the other team plays good defense, particularly run defense (gee too bad)
7) although we can say we had good stats, the RESULT of the game was a 3 point win over a 3 loss team in 3 overtimes (waaaa)

now let's get to the excuses left out
1) the refs blew some calls
2) we outplayed them by a huge a margin, the score doesn't reflect that
3) those damn special teams cost us
4) that kick was good (not good) - combined #1 and #3
5) our coach is too conservative
6) the ball bounced the wrong way for us
7) we are better than we played, we play much better at the end of our season
8) our record isn't as bad as it looks, cuz we play teams that used to be good
9) although we lost, if we played again we would win I just know it

oops, these second set of excuses are for moeller, sorry

When do you graduate from junior high?
 
i think gutierrez had three completions after his first two games

you are right he was a seasoned passer after 3 passes

Find out and let us know. He had the pre-season and two games under his belt. He was not playing in inclement weather. Your comparison is irrelevant. End of story.
 
as for DLS schedule this year

they scheduled serra
serra was the #2 ranked team in NORTTERN CALIFORNIA to start the year

they scheduled Palma, which was thought to contend for the Central Coast Section Championship

they scheduled Mission Viejo, year in and year out is a NATIONAL power, who this year beat a GCL playoff winning team

they scheduled Loyola, a catholic team from LA that has played for the SS Championship

I guess hindsight tells us that DLS should schedule different teams is that it?

maybe we should wait until the season is over then go back in time and have DLS play teams that were better than expected instead of not as good as expected?

SHEESH

same ol concha (jealous of DLS boy)
 
Find out and let us know. He had the pre-season and two games under his belt. He was not playing in inclement weather. Your comparison is irrelevant. End of story.

what does he had pre=season mean?

Did St X have ONE QB take ALL their snaps in "pre-season" and through 7 0r 8 weeks of practice and games

did they?

if they did, therein lies the problem

if they didn't, your argument (as usual) crashes with a thud
 
It rained during the California bowl games last year (at least during the first two).

That was a MAJOR factor, at least for me.

It was pretty depressing to go all the way to California just to be cold and wet.

And the breaks between games were very, very, very long.

Don't know if the teams were affected as much as I was, though.
 
Iggy has three losses to teams with a combined 31-4 record

one was glenville

who lost to a cali team

(like moeller and like elder)

Yes. They did. To a 9-1 Cali team.

Glenville beat Poly statistically (221 yards to 186, about +5 minutes in TOP) and the game went down to the wire. Glenville is very dangerous, but kill themselves with turnovers and a very poor kicking game (awful is perhaps a better word).

Losing to Poly in a tight game is bad?
 
and WHICH excuse are you saying hasn't been offered?

WHICH?

I proferred reasons. If you care to view them as excuses, then knock yourself out (repeatedly, please).

I haven't said anything like what you appear to be getting all worked up over. Are you having imaginary arguments with me in your head or something?
 
Yes. They did. To a 9-1 Cali team.

Glenville beat Poly statistically (221 yards to 186, about +5 minutes in TOP) and the game went down to the wire. Glenville is very dangerous, but kill themselves with turnovers and a very poor kicking game (awful is perhaps a better word).

Losing to Poly in a tight game is bad?

oh i see glenvile has excuses as well

must be true for all ohio teams
 
It rained during the California bowl games last year (at least during the first two).

That was a MAJOR factor, at least for me.

It was pretty depressing to go all the way to California just to be cold and wet.

And the breaks between games were very, very, very long.

Don't know if the teams were affected as much as I was, though.

most DLS insiders say having to take finals the day of the game was the killer

I say losing to a better team was the reason
 
X was playing a sophomore QB in his first varsity start on a day with winds gusting over 30 mph. Ignatius is strong on run D and weaker against the pass. That you can't process the significance of this information is an advertisement of stupidity.]

yes you are right

you didnt type the above

Luca Brasi held a gun to your head and forced you

there are FIVE excuses in that ONE sentence
 
concha you are the same guy who FOR YEARS came to cali boards and said dls doesnt play anybody and cali sucks and if cali teams came to ohio they would get big losses from real powerful ohio teams

i would state as evidence:

dls over elder
MV over Moeller
LB Polyover Glenville



your habit of trying to add bold type to each line as a response when actually you say virtually nothing doesnt fool anyone

here is an example of your great debating skills and strategy:

DLS beat MV by 28 [And?]
wow provocative!

how could i ever respond

I'll write down here so you don't get upset anymore.

1) I believe you are referring to my opinion that DLS's streak would not have been as long had they played in Ohio D1. And I have posted very little on California boards ever. Your revisionism is hardly surprising.

2) If DLS's win over an Elder team that was spanked at least three other times that year and sat home for the Ohio D1 tourney is some sort of vindication for you, well, that's just grand.

3) If MV pulling out a win against Moe makes you feel like Cali had a win over the '76 national champion Crusaders, again I am thrilled for you. Moe is now home on the couch and would be there for two straight weeks now had their round one opponent not decided to turn the ball over 5 times in rapid succession. Ditto for Poly over Glenville. Tight games both that went down to the wire.

4) The "And?" is a request for you to apply some significance and relevance to the point. There was none. You are good that way.
 
as for DLS schedule this year

they scheduled serra
serra was the #2 ranked team in NORTTERN CALIFORNIA to start the year

they scheduled Palma, which was thought to contend for the Central Coast Section Championship

they scheduled Mission Viejo, year in and year out is a NATIONAL power, who this year beat a GCL playoff winning team

they scheduled Loyola, a catholic team from LA that has played for the SS Championship

I guess hindsight tells us that DLS should schedule different teams is that it?

maybe we should wait until the season is over then go back in time and have DLS play teams that were better than expected instead of not as good as expected?

SHEESH

same ol concha (jealous of DLS boy)

Overreact much?

I simply pointed out that it must be disaapointing for DLS to have a very good team this year but no real competition worth talking about. Last year is, and here's that word again, irrelevant.

When you get to high school you may find out that calling people jealous is looked at as childish. I happen to think DLS is a great program and Lad may be the best high school coach ever. If that makes me jealous in your view, that's fine and dandy.
 
Top