I've officiated in three states including Ohio and the good ol' boy network absolutely exists, to a certain extent, in each one. To act like it doesn't or that there aren't good officials who have been royally screwed over by it is just being disingenuous and holier-than-thou.
In Ohio it can largely be dependent on the conference. I remember when I got into men's college basketball officiating that a certain assigner in Central Ohio was still trying to tell me I wasn't good enough to work varsity games in his "prestigious" league (you assign high school basketball, dude
) because I "hadn't worked enough subvarsity." Meanwhile he was putting garbage "veteran" officials on some of his games every night under the guise of "my coaches trust these guys." I ended up not giving him any availability and when he asked why I reminded him of our conversation and told him to go kick rocks.
I will say that at the OHSAA level the state does a pretty good job of advancing the officials who deserve to advance in the postseason. I could quibble about a few choices every now and then but for the most part I think the officials working the later rounds have deserved it.
I agree that there are plenty of officials who just aren't very good, haven't made any effort to get better, and use the good ol' boy excuse to obfuscate their shortcomings and lack of effort to improve themselves. But let's stop pretending like there are not also plenty of officials who have done everything they are supposed to do and still get screwed out of the games they deserve.