I voted for SR to win the league, but I was really torn between SR/Struthers. The votes were roughly 2:1 for SR and then a few for others. SR and Struthers played a game that, obviously, could have gone either way. FTR, I'd love to see them play again -- SR is improved and I think Struthers is, too. It'd be another really entertaining game, but, alas, SR is D5.
Girard is basically Girard. They can score. They can't defend.
I think Poland was a little less than I thought. I thought they'd be right there with SR/Struthers, but I think they're more with Girard as a step behind the top 2.
Niles suprised me. I thought they'd be closer to Lakeview/Hubbard, but they're way closer to the top than the bottom (IMO).
Lakeview did not surprise me, although I was completely baffled watching them play SR. They are better, but still have a long way to go.
Hubbard is Hubbard. I was told the roster was lacking and when you couple that with the hallmarks of Hubbard play -- crushing penalities, turnovers and a 1940s offense, you end up at 4 wins. I thought they'd finish above Lakeview for sure, and they probably should have, but eh.