SayMyName
Well-known member
You don't need to believe me, as I can tell it is tough for you to understand. It's ok, I'm patient with you."Yeah... Every damn one of them. Please believe me! Also, please believe that I have a job."
You don't need to believe me, as I can tell it is tough for you to understand. It's ok, I'm patient with you."Yeah... Every damn one of them. Please believe me! Also, please believe that I have a job."
Why would you need a link? You're the one that doesn't like the answer.link?
At this point, I don't need a thing from you. You defeated your own argument and proved yourself a liar at the same time. Congrats. There is not a legitimate person on Yappi that is not laughing at you right now. This was entertaining for me. Time for happy hour.Why would you need a link? You're the one that doesn't like the answer.
Hilarious you now want to use a definiton. Is that from the Urban Dictionary? Beastiology? 'Not need to be base on fact" So it is entirely possible for my opinions to based on fact as that is how I form MY opinions. In a debate setting, when arguing a point, is it better to use facts or just make things up? I know where you land on this as you're a hack.The best part of this is that you are too stupid to realize that your entire argument defeats itself. In your opinion, opinions posted on Yappi need to be based in fact. The problem is that the definition of opinion says it they not need to be based on fact. As such, it is impossible for all your opinions to be based on fact because this very opinion is not based on the factual definition of opinion. Now we can also add liar to your handle based on this very fact.
Actually it seems you started happy hours ago....LMAOAt this point, I don't need a thing from you. You defeated your own argument and proved yourself a liar at the same time. Congrats. There is not a legitimate person on Yappi that is not laughing at you right now. This was entertaining for me. Time for happy hour.
Lol. Now you want to argue the factual basis of definition. Your opinion on how opinions should be formulated is nothing but another opinion and not one based in fact. That fact is not debatable, liar. End of story.Hilarious you now want to use a definiton. Is that from the Urban Dictionary? Beastiology? 'Not need to be base on fact" So it is entirely possible for my opinions to based on fact as that is how I form MY opinions. In a debate setting, when arguing a point, is it better to use facts or just make things up? I know where you land on this as you're a hack.
That's your opinion....Yappi needs to screen shot this thread and make a tutorial for new users about how to not face plant yourself. Now it really is Miller time.
The left led by BLM screams defund the police...police budgets get slashed...but it's all just a coincidence right?Appease BLM ... LOL. Antifas too? Where did that happen?
One out of every 5 cops is a racist bully, you already informed us.Minority but not a fraction of a percent. 99.5% of cops are not good cops any more than 99.5% of any profession are good. That is just silly.
And there's no difference between the average Joe at your local tech job or whatever who shows up to work simply to pay the mortgage and put food on the table and the Joe who takes a job with a higher calling of serving the community.First, I ran sales organizations for tech companies for 20+ years. They ranged from a team of 8 to an organization of over 300. I did my fair share of forced stack rankings and annual reviews of performance. More recently, I have run a staffing (since sold) and a recruiting business where I work with dozens of companies helping them build out their sales organizations which includes replacing their employees who suck. I am unaware of any organization at any reasonable scale, whose employees are all good at their job. My experince is that 10-20% are not good.
Never said that, liar.One out of every 5 cops is a racist bully, you already informed us.
LOL. Yeah because all the people making 200-300K a year in tech are just going thru the motions. What an idiot.And there's no difference between the average Joe at your local tech job or whatever who shows up to work simply to pay the mortgage and put food on the table and the Joe who takes a job with a higher calling of serving the community.
Kneeling had nothing to do with police brutality in the macro. It was simply about the police are racist stormtroopers enforcing a systemically racist society, a ridiculous false narrative and why people took exception to it.That's a problematic attitude. The situation that started this thread, did not need any heads beaten or busted.
We have also allowed people to get all upset and make it a bigger outrage to take a knee in protest/ to draw attention to police brutality, than it is for the police to beat someone to death.
So you're saying the police are racist?Obviously, that is not true. Further, you have NEVER had the experience of being a black man being pulled over by police so you have zero idea how those thousands of interactions go every day. You are totally ignorant to the situation because you are basing it on your interactions.
Certainly some are. Likely in similar numbers to the general population. More important than all out racism is the element of bias and assumption.So you're saying the police are racist?
I wonder if his kids graduated the same time he did?
Your problem is comparing police work to the general workforce. You can't compare that job to the typical 9-5 where you show up to collect a paycheck and go home. People who are attracted to police work do it to serve others, they make a commitment that could include their own life. Are there people who can't hack the job and shouldn't be there, of course but it's nowhere near the level of the general workforce by the very nature of the job.I did not say cops are ineffective. You just made that up. My comment was a response to a claim that said 99.5% of cops are good. That is ridiculous. 99.5% of people in ANY vocation are not good at their job. Do you really think that 99.5% of employed people are good at their job? Cops are no different. What I said is the number of bad cops is much closer to 10-20% because that is more in line with the workforce in general.
Absolutely not why people took exception to it.Kneeling had nothing to do with police brutality in the macro. It was simply about the police are racist stormtroopers enforcing a systemically racist society, a ridiculous false narrative and why people took exception to it.
Which is a miniscule amount. You imply most police/minority interactions are poor "you'll never know what it's like to be a black man..."Certainly some are. Likely in similar numbers to the general population. More important than all out racism is the element of bias and assumption.
You have a conscience or you don't. If you break the law specifically violent crime you don't care about it.OK. So if you think I hate some kids. Let's use another example. I care about both my houses, but I care about the one in Florida more. Do you now understand the concept of relativity as it relates to caring? It is not an all or nothing deal. Many things are not.
So if you saw an unidentified person rummaging through your neighbors house at 1 am you'd just ignore it?did you see the story about the man cleaning out his deceased grandmother's apt. who was fatally shot?
the 911 PSAP system is lethal.
busybodies calling 911 and cops being dispatched on a busybody's word is lethal.
wyoming ohio. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...leaning-late-grandmothers-apartment-rcna68649
911 system is a complete failure
So if you saw an unidentified person rummaging through your neighbors house at 1 am you'd just ignore it?
LOL. Like every cop is there to serve others. Were those 5 cops in Memphis there to serve others? What a joke.Your problem is comparing police work to the general workforce. You can't compare that job to the typical 9-5 where you show up to collect a paycheck and go home. People who are attracted to police work do it to serve others, they make a commitment that could include their own life. Are there people who can't hack the job and shouldn't be there, of course but it's nowhere near the level of the general workforce by the very nature of the job.
There is not a minuscule number of racists in this country.Which is a miniscule amount. You imply most police/minority interactions are poor "you'll never know what it's like to be a black man..."
Sure I do because overwhelmingly they are treated just the same as everyone else...unless you are implying people who enter police work are inherently racist.
As for bias and assumption check crime statistics and maybe you'll understand.
Never said that and also never segmented crimes. I am talking about all crimes.You have a conscience or you don't. If you break the law specifically violent crime you don't care about it.
But give me the liberal perspective on the carjacker with a heart of gold.
There are more today than there were in the 90’sThere is not a minuscule number of racists in this country.
I saw a clip of Bill Maher this week comparing Mao's Cultural Revolution to the Woke Left.Also misunderstands Mao’s motivations behind the cultural revolution.
The revolution was about Mao regaining control of the CCP/China. Everything else was just what he had to do to get control back.
So if you saw an unidentified person rummaging through your neighbors house at 1 am you'd just ignore it?