Memphis Police beating suspect

Why would you need a link? You're the one that doesn't like the answer.
At this point, I don't need a thing from you. You defeated your own argument and proved yourself a liar at the same time. Congrats. There is not a legitimate person on Yappi that is not laughing at you right now. This was entertaining for me. Time for happy hour.
 
The best part of this is that you are too stupid to realize that your entire argument defeats itself. In your opinion, opinions posted on Yappi need to be based in fact. The problem is that the definition of opinion says it they not need to be based on fact. As such, it is impossible for all your opinions to be based on fact because this very opinion is not based on the factual definition of opinion. Now we can also add liar to your handle based on this very fact.
Hilarious you now want to use a definiton. Is that from the Urban Dictionary? Beastiology? 'Not need to be base on fact" So it is entirely possible for my opinions to based on fact as that is how I form MY opinions. In a debate setting, when arguing a point, is it better to use facts or just make things up? I know where you land on this as you're a hack.
 
At this point, I don't need a thing from you. You defeated your own argument and proved yourself a liar at the same time. Congrats. There is not a legitimate person on Yappi that is not laughing at you right now. This was entertaining for me. Time for happy hour.
Actually it seems you started happy hours ago....LMAO
 
Hilarious you now want to use a definiton. Is that from the Urban Dictionary? Beastiology? 'Not need to be base on fact" So it is entirely possible for my opinions to based on fact as that is how I form MY opinions. In a debate setting, when arguing a point, is it better to use facts or just make things up? I know where you land on this as you're a hack.
Lol. Now you want to argue the factual basis of definition. Your opinion on how opinions should be formulated is nothing but another opinion and not one based in fact. That fact is not debatable, liar. End of story.
 
Yappi needs to screen shot this thread and make a tutorial for new users about how to not face plant yourself. Now it really is Miller time.
 
Appease BLM ... LOL. Antifas too? Where did that happen?
The left led by BLM screams defund the police...police budgets get slashed...but it's all just a coincidence right?

Just typical budgetary matters 🤣
 
Minority but not a fraction of a percent. 99.5% of cops are not good cops any more than 99.5% of any profession are good. That is just silly.
One out of every 5 cops is a racist bully, you already informed us.
 
First, I ran sales organizations for tech companies for 20+ years. They ranged from a team of 8 to an organization of over 300. I did my fair share of forced stack rankings and annual reviews of performance. More recently, I have run a staffing (since sold) and a recruiting business where I work with dozens of companies helping them build out their sales organizations which includes replacing their employees who suck. I am unaware of any organization at any reasonable scale, whose employees are all good at their job. My experince is that 10-20% are not good.
And there's no difference between the average Joe at your local tech job or whatever who shows up to work simply to pay the mortgage and put food on the table and the Joe who takes a job with a higher calling of serving the community.
 
And there's no difference between the average Joe at your local tech job or whatever who shows up to work simply to pay the mortgage and put food on the table and the Joe who takes a job with a higher calling of serving the community.
LOL. Yeah because all the people making 200-300K a year in tech are just going thru the motions. What an idiot.
 
That's a problematic attitude. The situation that started this thread, did not need any heads beaten or busted.

We have also allowed people to get all upset and make it a bigger outrage to take a knee in protest/ to draw attention to police brutality, than it is for the police to beat someone to death.
Kneeling had nothing to do with police brutality in the macro. It was simply about the police are racist stormtroopers enforcing a systemically racist society, a ridiculous false narrative and why people took exception to it.
 
Obviously, that is not true. Further, you have NEVER had the experience of being a black man being pulled over by police so you have zero idea how those thousands of interactions go every day. You are totally ignorant to the situation because you are basing it on your interactions.
So you're saying the police are racist?
 
I wonder if his kids graduated the same time he did? 🤣
Back_to_School_Movie_Poster.jpg
 
I did not say cops are ineffective. You just made that up. My comment was a response to a claim that said 99.5% of cops are good. That is ridiculous. 99.5% of people in ANY vocation are not good at their job. Do you really think that 99.5% of employed people are good at their job? Cops are no different. What I said is the number of bad cops is much closer to 10-20% because that is more in line with the workforce in general.
Your problem is comparing police work to the general workforce. You can't compare that job to the typical 9-5 where you show up to collect a paycheck and go home. People who are attracted to police work do it to serve others, they make a commitment that could include their own life. Are there people who can't hack the job and shouldn't be there, of course but it's nowhere near the level of the general workforce by the very nature of the job.
 
Where are all the George Floyd-style riots and insurrections???????


Oh that's right, Trump isn't president and leftists only care about police brutality if they can make it a racial issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: y2h
Kneeling had nothing to do with police brutality in the macro. It was simply about the police are racist stormtroopers enforcing a systemically racist society, a ridiculous false narrative and why people took exception to it.
Absolutely not why people took exception to it.
 
Certainly some are. Likely in similar numbers to the general population. More important than all out racism is the element of bias and assumption.
Which is a miniscule amount. You imply most police/minority interactions are poor "you'll never know what it's like to be a black man..."

Sure I do because overwhelmingly they are treated just the same as everyone else...unless you are implying people who enter police work are inherently racist.

As for bias and assumption check crime statistics and maybe you'll understand.
 
OK. So if you think I hate some kids. Let's use another example. I care about both my houses, but I care about the one in Florida more. Do you now understand the concept of relativity as it relates to caring? It is not an all or nothing deal. Many things are not.
You have a conscience or you don't. If you break the law specifically violent crime you don't care about it.

But give me the liberal perspective on the carjacker with a heart of gold.
 
Your problem is comparing police work to the general workforce. You can't compare that job to the typical 9-5 where you show up to collect a paycheck and go home. People who are attracted to police work do it to serve others, they make a commitment that could include their own life. Are there people who can't hack the job and shouldn't be there, of course but it's nowhere near the level of the general workforce by the very nature of the job.
LOL. Like every cop is there to serve others. Were those 5 cops in Memphis there to serve others? What a joke.
 
Which is a miniscule amount. You imply most police/minority interactions are poor "you'll never know what it's like to be a black man..."

Sure I do because overwhelmingly they are treated just the same as everyone else...unless you are implying people who enter police work are inherently racist.

As for bias and assumption check crime statistics and maybe you'll understand.
There is not a minuscule number of racists in this country.
 
You have a conscience or you don't. If you break the law specifically violent crime you don't care about it.

But give me the liberal perspective on the carjacker with a heart of gold.
Never said that and also never segmented crimes. I am talking about all crimes.
 
Also misunderstands Mao’s motivations behind the cultural revolution.

The revolution was about Mao regaining control of the CCP/China. Everything else was just what he had to do to get control back.
I saw a clip of Bill Maher this week comparing Mao's Cultural Revolution to the Woke Left.

He joked, "I asked ChatGPT if there were similarities between today's American woke revolution and Mao's Cultural Revolution and it wrote back, 'How long do you have?' "

He went on to go on and show how similar they are and reminded us that Mao's effort gave us wonderful things like re-education camps, ideological purifiers called "The Red Guard", and millions of murdered people who did not want to change basic human nature.

So, maybe me and Bill Maher should re-read up on Mao so that we have your level of knowledge. But maybe, just maybe, if a conservative and a classic liberal have the same thought in the same week, they might be onto something true.
 
Top