XdesIDtrans
New member
This is one incredibly pathetic thread... Good thing X is not out to prove they are the best except in the only way they can...beating every team they play...
1) you compare week 1 to week 10 - and in doing so you fail to understand the nature of the game and you fail to understand Moeller which is a team that only tends to click late in the season... That same team that lost to the Regional champs after 3OT is the same team that lost to Lakota West in the first week. Did LW play Colerain nearly as closely? The answer is no... your comparison here is worthless.
2) You are also talking about an X team that has had two key injuries... and the hardest schedule in the nation according to some to weather those injuries against. Those to players happen to be the biggest star and the architect of the offense... hmmm...
3) Lets run some numbers...
Moeller 22 vs MV 26
De La Salle 35 vs MV 7
Moeller 33 vs Elder 49
St. X 45 vs Elder 14
So X would beat DLS by 15 right?
Only if you're an sweetie and try to use score comparisons because you have no real understanding of high school football/choose to ignore the fact that A vs B + B vs C comparisons hold no water because you are trying to prove a point that cannot be proven.
4) Until the rest of the GCL plays MV and Moeller rematches MV, you have no argument with the numbers game.
EXAMPLE:
Game 1:
Princeton 43 Centerville 42
Game 2:
Princeton 21 Centerville 42
(with 14 of Princeton's pts coming late in the game after all of Centervilles 42)
Or another better example:
Game 1
St. X 42 vs St. Ignatius 41
Game 2 (State Finals)
#2 St. X (10-0) 7 vs Unranked St. Ignatius (6-4) 37
Interesting how some teams keep improving through the end of the season Moeller has a history of doing the exact same thing.
You aren't taken seriously around here and for good reason, you have virtually nothing to base your arguments on and until DLS and X either play (which they won't) or have many more common opponents not ones twice removed there is no way to gauge it. So as sure as you are, you have no idea... At least the other posters on here acknowledge that...
1) you compare week 1 to week 10 - and in doing so you fail to understand the nature of the game and you fail to understand Moeller which is a team that only tends to click late in the season... That same team that lost to the Regional champs after 3OT is the same team that lost to Lakota West in the first week. Did LW play Colerain nearly as closely? The answer is no... your comparison here is worthless.
2) You are also talking about an X team that has had two key injuries... and the hardest schedule in the nation according to some to weather those injuries against. Those to players happen to be the biggest star and the architect of the offense... hmmm...
3) Lets run some numbers...
Moeller 22 vs MV 26
De La Salle 35 vs MV 7
Moeller 33 vs Elder 49
St. X 45 vs Elder 14
So X would beat DLS by 15 right?
Only if you're an sweetie and try to use score comparisons because you have no real understanding of high school football/choose to ignore the fact that A vs B + B vs C comparisons hold no water because you are trying to prove a point that cannot be proven.
4) Until the rest of the GCL plays MV and Moeller rematches MV, you have no argument with the numbers game.
EXAMPLE:
Game 1:
Princeton 43 Centerville 42
Game 2:
Princeton 21 Centerville 42
(with 14 of Princeton's pts coming late in the game after all of Centervilles 42)
Or another better example:
Game 1
St. X 42 vs St. Ignatius 41
Game 2 (State Finals)
#2 St. X (10-0) 7 vs Unranked St. Ignatius (6-4) 37
Interesting how some teams keep improving through the end of the season Moeller has a history of doing the exact same thing.
You aren't taken seriously around here and for good reason, you have virtually nothing to base your arguments on and until DLS and X either play (which they won't) or have many more common opponents not ones twice removed there is no way to gauge it. So as sure as you are, you have no idea... At least the other posters on here acknowledge that...