Maybe in a year or 2, not this year. I’m glad they finally hired a competent coach, but he inherited many players from the last regime who are average at best.St. Ursula will win the GGCL
No defending the coach but doing a quick look on the website, since 2015, UA's program has only had one winning season. in the period since he's been coaching, there have been 2 GGCl teams that have won state and SUA has been solid over the course of that time too. How much of this can be attributed to enrollment declining. They have been about as dominant in volleyball in the state and UA could barely field a freshman team this year - heard they are only around 80-85 freshman this yearOak Hills-9
Ursuline-2
Ursuline coach stunk at Elder and now stinking up a once proud program at UA!
Not sure about enrollment, But that is very concerning if true. Speaking of enrollment i think Seton was the biggest beneficiary of the Mercy/McCauley merger!No defending the coach but doing a quick look on the website, since 2015, UA's program has only had one winning season. in the period since he's been coaching, there have been 2 GGCl teams that have won state and SUA has been solid over the course of that time too. How much of this can be attributed to enrollment declining. They have been about as dominant in volleyball in the state and UA could barely field a freshman team this year - heard they are only around 80-85 freshman this year
It is true on the frosh number, 84, at UA this year. New President and principal brought in this summer to right the ship. Another class or two that size, their athletic department could take awhile to recover.Not sure about enrollment, But that is very concerning if true. Speaking of enrollment i think Seton was the biggest beneficiary of the Mercy/McCauley merger!
Your definition of a "big win" and my definition are definitely different especially since most of the goals in this game were because of defensive and GK errors that nobody would expect to see out of state powerhouse teams. Now, Seton beating Anderson 5-0 (who tied Mason 1-1) is a "big win." Mason defeating UA is a good win since they're the second best team out of the Central District 1-0. If Mason were to beat Olentangy Orange, arguably the best team in the Central District as of now, two or three to nothing then, that would be a "big win." When there are 8 goals scored in a game, the team winning is usually the team that made the fewest mistakes on defense, or was a little better at finishing, or was just the luckier team that day. Winning 5-3 on the other team's two major blunders would be a good win (only because it was Walsh) or more likely I would call it an "ugly win" since both teams yielded so many goals and since the final score easily could've been 5-4 or 4-4.I would say a big win considering Centerville was 1-2 entering the game and Walsh is also a top program in the state historically.
Your definition of a "big win" and my definition are definitely different especially since most of the goals in this game were because of defensive and GK errors that nobody would expect to see out of state powerhouse teams. Now, Seton beating Anderson 5-0 (who tied Mason 1-1) is a "big win." Mason defeating UA is a good win since they're the second best team out of the Central District 1-0. If Mason were to beat Olentangy Orange, arguably the best team in the Central District as of now, two or three to nothing then, that would be a "big win." When there are 8 goals scored in a game, the team winning is usually the team that made the fewest mistakes on defense, or was a little better at finishing, or was just the luckier team that day. Winning 5-3 on the other team's two major blunders would be a good win (only because it was Walsh) or more likely I would call it an "ugly win" since both teams yielded so many goals and since the final score easily could've been 5-4 or 4-4.
Context matters! I didn't see the Mason v UA game but, if the only goal scored was an own goal by UA then, I would call Mason's victory an "ugly win" or a "lucky win" since Mason didn't actually score against UA. As for the Seton win against Anderson, even a 3-0 win over Anderson is a "good win" since Anderson is a quality team and any time you beat a quality opponent by three goals is a "good win." Now if Seton defeated Anderson 1-0 then, I would call that a win. I wouldn't call a 1-0 score over Anderson a good win since Seton was the favorite and was supposed to win by several goals. So, context does matter especially when considering how teams score, the amount of time in possession of the ball, the number of shots on goal, whether or not a team was expected to win/lose, etc. If a lower seeded team defeats a higher seeded team then, that would be a "good win" unless they won due to an own goal which would then constitute a "lucky win."Lucky goals and mistakes are part of the game, these are high school kids. So if masons goal last night was an own goal by UA would we not count that as a win?
If Anderson gave seton a few lucky goals on mistakes, are we going to discredit that game and no longer consider it a good win by seton?
CONTEXT matters! And in the CONTEXT of a 1-2 start to the season, down 2-0 early against a perennial state powerhouse, that was a great, much needed, important, HUGE win for Centerville. Not sure how much more time we want to spend debating the correct label for the victory, but I know for certain Centerville doesn't care what we call it. They did what they needed to do to win. Kudos to them.Context matters! I didn't see the Mason v UA game but, if the only goal scored was an own goal by UA then, I would call Mason's victory an "ugly win" or a "lucky win" since Mason didn't actually score against UA. As for the Seton win against Anderson, even a 3-0 win over Anderson is a "good win" since Anderson is a quality team and any time you beat a quality opponent by three goals is a "good win." Now if Seton defeated Anderson 1-0 then, I would call that a win. I wouldn't call a 1-0 score over Anderson a good win since Seton was the favorite and was supposed to win by several goals. So, context does matter especially when considering how teams score, the amount of time in possession of the ball, the number of shots on goal, whether or not a team was expected to win/lose, etc. If a lower seeded team defeats a higher seeded team then, that would be a "good win" unless they won due to an own goal which would then constitute a "lucky win."
I believe this is actually the second president and principal turnover in a few years as their dwindling enrollment is not new, though this year is an all time low.It is true on the frosh number, 84, at UA this year. New President and principal brought in this summer to right the ship. Another class or two that size, their athletic department could take awhile to recover.
It is. For me, this topic needs to be in a different thread to further discuss. I want to keep the sports aspect in this thread. Hence, my comment on numbers as it relates to affecting sports.I believe this is actually the second president and principal turnover in a few years as their dwindling enrollment is not new, though this year is an all time low.
Totally fine too (not sure UA would want an entire thread started for that discussion though, they know why their numbers are dwindling) but I felt compelled to clarify the 'righting the ship' comment because that isn't a sure bet just yet given this is a second attempt with a new president and principal. As for sports context, I wouldn't attribute their soccer woes to enrollment per se, they have never made it to powerhouse status in soccer partly because of the lack of on site field, they never made good on the promise to build the fields they were showing mock-ups of at open houses 5+ years ago when they said they'd bought the little strip mall that sits in front of their campus where it was supposed to go.It is. For me, this topic needs to be in a different thread to further discuss. I want to keep the sports aspect in this thread. Hence, my comment on numbers as it relates to affecting sports.
I stand by the righting the ship comment. The school is a business—all the privates are. They are adjusting to customers.Totally fine too (not sure UA would want an entire thread started for that discussion though, they know why their numbers are dwindling) but I felt compelled to clarify the 'righting the ship' comment because that isn't a sure bet just yet given this is a second attempt with a new president and principal. As for sports context, I wouldn't attribute their soccer woes to enrollment per se, they have never made it to powerhouse status in soccer partly because of the lack of on site field, they never made good on the promise to build the fields they were showing mock-ups of at open houses 5+ years ago when they said they'd bought the little strip mall that sits in front of their campus where it was supposed to go.
Using Max Preps Rankings its just not logical. Cloverleaf (?) is 2. Dayton Carroll is 4. Fairfield Union is 13. Western Brown is 18.Pundit, I see your point and appreciate your insight. Though I look at it a few different ways.
In the WJ game, if the Defense and the Keeper made that many mistakes, then either they are not as good as their record/reputation or the pressure from Centerville made good players make bad decisions. Unlike the Mason/UA game this was not a one total goal or one goal win affair. So while those mistakes may have added up, it is more often than not mistakes that create situations that allow scoring. Mistakes created by opposing players putting someone in a situation to make a bad decision. So I still think after reading your context that it was a good win for Centerville. They have not put in 5 goals vs a quality opponent in years and Javier fields good teams and with the level of talent Walsh has it is a good win and hopefully helps Centerville right itself.
The Mason/UA match, it is a big win for the program. Mason has not beaten a high quality opponent in a couple years. And this is the Largest school in the state with the socio economics to be the best program and while nobody wants to say it out loud that's a big part of soccer success. (That and how many high quality club players you have and usually those two go hand in hand.) If the own goal was a keeper or defender trying to clear and it rebounded back in for a goal, that sucks. If it was a shot someone took that glanced off a defender well that is a good hard well placed shot. Regardless Mason has been struggling, UA coming into that game was Maxpreps RPI state #1. And if UA didnt want to lose they should have scored. UA outshot Mason by more than 2:1 but a W is a W. If you have followed any of my rants and ramblings on here you would know I'm not a huge fan of Mason, and I have called out Centerville's lack of scoring for years. Tough result for both UA at home and WJ on the road but they are both in the books.
Just curious on how not having a field would deter soccer players from going to UA - Seton plays at the PAC (Elder's complex) which is about 1 mile from Seton's campus. The program has been on the rise since the '19 season.Totally fine too (not sure UA would want an entire thread started for that discussion though, they know why their numbers are dwindling) but I felt compelled to clarify the 'righting the ship' comment because that isn't a sure bet just yet given this is a second attempt with a new president and principal. As for sports context, I wouldn't attribute their soccer woes to enrollment per se, they have never made it to powerhouse status in soccer partly because of the lack of on site field, they never made good on the promise to build the fields they were showing mock-ups of at open houses 5+ years ago when they said they'd bought the little strip mall that sits in front of their campus where it was supposed to go.
The school and faculty are catering (or adjusting) to a much smaller demographic. I know legacy moms and families with older siblings that attended UA, both are sending their younger daughters elsewhere.I stand by the righting the ship comment. The school is a business—all the privates are. They are adjusting to customers.
I agree that it was a much needed win for Centerville. My point is that they easily could’ve lost this game so in that context being 2-2 overall is much better than 1-3 which is why it was an important win for them and from their point of view they probably do consider it to be a huge win. However, from a neutral objective POV and IMHO they were fortunate to win.CONTEXT matters! And in the CONTEXT of a 1-2 start to the season, down 2-0 early against a perennial state powerhouse, that was a great, much needed, important, HUGE win for Centerville. Not sure how much more time we want to spend debating the correct label for the victory, but I know for certain Centerville doesn't care what we call it. They did what they needed to do to win. Kudos to them.
Having an on site home field for a high school student is always going to be preferred for a variety of reasons but particularly when freshman and sophomores can't drive, its just an added hassle. How much it matters will vary but it can certainly factor into the decision. If UA is your dream school in every other way is it going to deter you, no. If you really like other schools too and they have on site fields is it reason to sway you toward them when you have to make a decision, sure. I'm not sure I'd consider Seton to be a true apples to apples comparison though I do understand your point, and that's fair.Just curious on how not having a field would deter soccer players from going to UA - Seton plays at the PAC (Elder's complex) which is about 1 mile from Seton's campus. The program has been on the rise since the '19 season.
That adjustment you are referring to began in 2019. It backfired. They are working their way back to where they should be. Read everything before you comment.The school and faculty are catering (or adjusting) to a much smaller demographic. I know legacy moms and families with older siblings that attended UA, both are sending their younger daughters elsewhere.
Do you think the folks that promised the fields at UA are the same ones who had/have a hand in the Moe fb stadium? Sorry, too easy.Totally fine too (not sure UA would want an entire thread started for that discussion though, they know why their numbers are dwindling) but I felt compelled to clarify the 'righting the ship' comment because that isn't a sure bet just yet given this is a second attempt with a new president and principal. As for sports context, I wouldn't attribute their soccer woes to enrollment per se, they have never made it to powerhouse status in soccer partly because of the lack of on site field, they never made good on the promise to build the fields they were showing mock-ups of at open houses 5+ years ago when they said they'd bought the little strip mall that sits in front of their campus where it was supposed to go.