Thavoice
Well-known member
I was going to bring this up earlier today actually about allowing everyone to re enter once.I agree with AS12 that roster batting is not something we should be doing in the spring, but I'd add that at the Varsity level only.
To me, in JV or frosh (or JV "B" as they insist on calling it in certain parts of the state), I'd be in favor of roster batting. The NFHS is always expressing their concern about participation in baseball. This is a way to increase that. Defensive subbing could be the same in that each player could be removed defensively once, still bat, and then re-enter into the field on defense. Once a hitter who did not start defensively enters to play the field and is then removed (via 're-entry' of the starter) they can only hit for the rest of the game. Sounds antithetical, but it's sub-varsity so let's support the kids playing.
Also sub-varsity games should be 6 innings in my mind. Sure, larger schools are not afflicted, but some of the smaller schools who barely hang on with a roster should be permitted to play 6 outside of the "mutual agreement to end the game" rule. Every other HS sport generally plays reduced time the lower you go, so why not baseball? I've seen many, many JV teams fold in our area of the state due to low participation. This might help. But the NFHS is slow to change because many will argue "this isn't real baseball."
I was going to propose narrowing it to an emergency catcher but I would be ok with it on the JV/FROSH level.
There were many a time we had to wait for that catcher to sub in later in the game to pinch hit because he was the last line of defense. We didnt want to use him earlier in a game as a PH and burn him, and if the get hung out to dry because of an injury later in the game.
I know one option would be put that catcher in and if he gets inured re enter the starter, but I am all for the best players to play and not sit a half of a game but there were times we would have liked to have him PH in the 3rd or so some place in the lineup but held him back.
I would only propose the catcher provision at the varsity level.
HOWEVER>..I believe the participation levels have decreased for a different reason (locally there are some DIII and bigger teams who coudlnt field a JV team some on nights the varsity played let alone a FROSH team).
I feel the participation levels are decreasing because of the travel ball an immense cost, travel and time involved at the lower levels and it is running off a lot of kids. With so many kids fleeing the local rec leagues, those rec leagues are becoming less and less relevent.
Luckily my home town the town/rec baseball program is a vibrant as ever and it shows at the HS level with a fully stocked FROSH, JV and Varsity team. This happens mostly because pretty much all the kids play locally first , and some do branch out for extra teams but not at the cost of alienating their rec teams.