Trump Investigation, Lawsuit and Indictment Tracker

gneiss rocks said:
Like I said "from a very anti Trump source." This is not the only time the DOJ passed on this....this is a state case advanced to a federal case which they changed the law specifically to get Trump.
Total scam witch hunt exposed.
Click to expand...
It wasn’t because of a thorough review of the law; it was because Trump’s attorney general told them to stop … isn’t this the kind of stuff you are supposedly upset with Biden … Oh, I get it … if it is Trump you are OK with it … but if it is not Trump it is an absolutely travesty … much like the fake news … if it is not your fake news it is terrible … but if it is your fake news it is OK … partisan politics at its finest!
 
joesports said:
It wasn’t because of a thorough review of the law; it was because Trump’s attorney general told them to stop … isn’t this the kind of stuff you are supposedly upset with Biden … Oh, I get it … if it is Trump you are OK with it … but if it is not Trump it is an absolutely travesty … much like the fake news … if it is not your fake news it is terrible … but if it is your fake news it is OK … partisan politics at its finest!
Click to expand...
Also wasn't it Trumps AG that put Michael Cohen in jail for the Hush Money scandal on behalf of Individual #1?
 
1713705579364.jpeg
 
joesports said:
This is where you get confused because details matter … Trump is NOT being charged because he paid hush money to a porn star … that is not illegal … he is being charged for lying about it … well technically falsifying business records … this is what makes it different then the so called “proof” you posted … the devil is in the details.
Click to expand...
Sounds like the "Clinton isn't being impeached for banging his intern in the Oval Office, it's for lying about it" 😂

There's no crime, these are bogus charges brought to serve a political end. It's not a coincidence this is being pursued in an election year by a DA who campaigned on getting Trump.
 
joesports said:
Did you even read this article? …

it’s true that this case was initially a federal case, initiated by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. In fact, they’re the ones who prosecuted Michael Cohen, who paid Stormy Daniels in the hush money scandal.

At that point, did federal prosecutors conclude that the case was simply over and walk away? Not exactly.
What they actually found was that Cohen acted at Trump’s direction and to Trump’s benefit. Why didn’t prosecutors pursue the matter further? According to Geoffrey Berman — the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, who wrote a book about his experiences — it’s because there was political interference from other Trump appointees who ordered prosecutors to end their investigation.

Indeed, according to Berman’s book, then-Attorney General Bill Barr not only intervened in the case, he tried to kill the ongoing investigation and even suggested that Cohen’s conviction should be reversed.

The GOP committee chairs wrote yesterday that federal prosecutors “determined that no additional people would be charged alongside Cohen,” but they conveniently overlooked why they made that determination. What they actually found was that Cohen acted at Trump’s direction and to Trump’s benefit. Why didn’t prosecutors pursue the matter further? According to Geoffrey Berman — the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, who wrote a book about his experiences — it’s because there was political interference from other Trump appointees who ordered prosecutors to end their investigation.

Indeed, according to Berman’s book, then-Attorney General Bill Barr not only intervened in the case, he tried to kill the ongoing investigation and even suggested that Cohen’s conviction should be reversed.

The GOP committee chairs wrote yesterday that federal prosecutors “determined that no additional people would be charged alongside Cohen,” but they conveniently overlooked why they made that determination.

It wasn’t because of a thorough review of the law; it was because Trump’s attorney general told them to stop
Click to expand...
Love the smell of leftist conspiracy theories in the morning.

Why didn't they pursue the matter after Barr was no longer AG?
 
joesports said:
You are against a rich guy going into public office … noted

poe.com

What factors contributed to Alvin Bragg's net worth of 41 million dollars?

Web-Search: Alvin Bragg's net worth of $41 million can be attributed to several factors, including his successful legal career, real estate investments, and stock portfolio. Here are the key factors t
poe.com poe.com
Click to expand...
You are against a rich guy getting loans against his real estate holdings, but even more so, for having the gall to run for President against your Stuttering God.
 
Stirred not Shaken said:
Who are "you guys" are they not Americans (or are they russians, chiinese, martians) or are only people who are devoted to trump, true Americans. Trump has done to this country exactly what he has wanted - divide and conquer I will give him credit he is a good politician.
Click to expand...
You do realize that you trying to given Trump credit for doing exactly what Obama did as far as dividing the nation. Now Biden has been doing his best to keep doing the same but without as much success as Obama.
 
19AL63 said:
You do realize that you trying to given Trump credit for doing exactly what Obama did as far as dividing the nation. Now Biden has been doing his best to keep doing the same but without as much success as Obama.
Click to expand...
I was no divided by Obama. If you decide to pick some side, that is on your. Be accountable for your own actions.
 
ProV1 said:
I was no divided by Obama. If you decide to pick some side, that is on your. Be accountable for your own actions.
Click to expand...
I was "no" divided by Obama either, but he sure worked at dividing us as a nation. Has nothing to do with me picking a side. Being accountable would be responding honestly with us and yourself on what is happen it our once great nation.
 
19AL63 said:
I was "no" divided by Obama either, but he sure worked at dividing us as a nation. Has nothing to do with me picking a side. Being accountable would be responding honestly with us and yourself on what is happen it our once great nation.
Click to expand...
We have a great nation and it is in fact better because of Obama. Huge improvement over his predecessor even though I was not convinced until after he was elected.
 
ProV1 said:
We have a great nation and it is in fact better because of Obama. Huge improvement over his predecessor even though I was not convinced until after he was elected.
Click to expand...
You are making a joke. Has to be, no one could think like you would have to think to come to that conclusion. I guess only listen and reading liberal left leaning news could make you think that way if you leave the use of any commonsense out of the equation.
 
19AL63 said:
You are making a joke. Has to be, no one could think like you would have to think to come to that conclusion. I guess only listen and reading liberal left leaning news could make you think that way if you leave the use of any commonsense out of the equation.
Click to expand...
No. I lived thru it. Took us out of a massive recession with good policy. Quality of life in America improved drastically under him. Not really debatable.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: y2h
ProV1 said:
No. I lived thru it. Took us out of a massive recession with good policy. Quality of life in America improved drastically under him. Not really debatable.
Click to expand...
If that recovery from a massive recession could have been slow walked any slower we would have had be crawling and not walking. About the not being debatable part that is only in your liberal left sided brain. Do you know what Obama said was the sweetest sound you can hear?
 
19AL63 said:
If that recovery from a massive recession could have been slow walked any slower we would have had be crawling and not walking. About the not being debatable part that is only in your liberal left sided brain. Do you know what Obama said was the sweetest sound you can hear?
Click to expand...
So what part of his economic policy dealing with the Great Recession did you disagree with?
 
gneiss rocks said:
Then there is this, even reported from a very anti Trump source. Why did they pass on any prosecution?
www.msnbc.com

The key reason the DOJ didn’t prosecute Trump’s hush money case

Three powerful House Republican committee chairs are ignoring the fact that Team Trump derailed the federal investigation into the hush money scandal.
www.msnbc.com www.msnbc.com
Then moving down the line we have this.

Up next, how they changed the statute of limitations specifically for Trump. From a Anti trump source again.
www.newsweek.com

Has the Statute of Limitations Run Out on the Stormy Daniels Payment?

What seemed like any other New Yorker moving down to Florida might end up being the most consequential decision of former President Donald Trump's life.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com

They even named it the zombie case because so many dropped it for lack of evidence of crime. Including Bragg himself.
Click to expand...
you do realize that what you are trying to use as a defense is so half baked trump's legal team won't even try to claim it.
 
joesports said:
He didn’t even read his own “proof” … the key reason was Trump put a stop to it … 😂😂😂😂
Click to expand...

They could have taken it back up anytime in the last 4 years but this DOJ came to the same conclusion, there is nothing there.
It is at worst a bookkeeping error.
 

Impeachment ‘Whistleblower’ Was in the Loop of Biden-Ukraine Affairs That Trump Wanted Probed​


The ‘whistleblower’ who sparked Donald Trump’s first impeachment was deeply involved in the political maneuverings behind Biden-family business schemes in Ukraine that Trump wanted probed, newly obtained emails from former Vice President Joe Biden’s office reveal.

In 2019, then-National Intelligence Council analyst Eric Ciaramella touched off a political firestorm when he anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country.

But four years earlier, while working as a national security analyst attached to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s office, Ciaramella was a close adviser when Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Ukraine unless it fired its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. At the time, the corruption-riddled energy giant was paying Biden’s son Hunter millions of dollars.

Those payments – along with other evidence tying Joe Biden to his family’s business dealings – received little attention in 2019 as Ciaramella accused Trump of a corrupt quid pro quo. Neither did subsequent evidence indicating that Hunter Biden’s associates had identified Shokin as a “key target.” These matters are now part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
 
OldSoulon said:

Impeachment ‘Whistleblower’ Was in the Loop of Biden-Ukraine Affairs That Trump Wanted Probed​


The ‘whistleblower’ who sparked Donald Trump’s first impeachment was deeply involved in the political maneuverings behind Biden-family business schemes in Ukraine that Trump wanted probed, newly obtained emails from former Vice President Joe Biden’s office reveal.

In 2019, then-National Intelligence Council analyst Eric Ciaramella touched off a political firestorm when he anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country.

But four years earlier, while working as a national security analyst attached to then-Vice President Joe Biden’s office, Ciaramella was a close adviser when Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Ukraine unless it fired its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. At the time, the corruption-riddled energy giant was paying Biden’s son Hunter millions of dollars.

Those payments – along with other evidence tying Joe Biden to his family’s business dealings – received little attention in 2019 as Ciaramella accused Trump of a corrupt quid pro quo. Neither did subsequent evidence indicating that Hunter Biden’s associates had identified Shokin as a “key target.” These matters are now part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Biden.
Click to expand...
Not even the same thing … we have been over this numerous times … but the Trumpets can’t understand or care to really understand the differences … because Trump is always a victim mentality

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top