Wyld Stallions
New member
So going back through these posts and looking at things rationally (which seems like a hard thing to do for the Valley View community right now)
The top 3 candidates that the posters on this thread wanted were: Stidham, Niswonger, and King
Stidham was let go from his assistant football and head boys basketball job by the publicly elected board due to, for the sake of being politically correct, being a poor role model for the kids. You can argue that there were agendas and blah, blah, blah, but the people that were elected by the community thought there was enough evidence to remove him from BOTH spots.
Niswonger who was ultra successful in the mid 90s, winning 4 state titles with the last one in 97 (if I remember correctly), which is 25 YEARS AGO (making those seniors 42-43 years old). Got let go in the early 2000s because he wasn't winning and had gone off the reservation. Bounced around and never stuck. Most recently was the OC at Beavercreek where the team went 0-10, scored 68 total points ALL SEASON, and never scored 20 points in a game ALL SEASON. Seems that he didn't adjust to game as time has gone by.
For the last candidate, I'll quote from an earlier post that was made to why the latest coach was let go... "Had nothing to do with scouting reports we have to much talent to go 5-6 leading at half in 5 of the 6 losses. Make no adjustments during the game or at halftime and got outscored 69-7 in the second half of the last three games." King was the DC correct? Isn't he directly responsible for the unit allowing those teams to score those 69 points?! Did he not make any halftime adjustments? Will he now since he's the new Head Coach? How is that a reflection on the latest coach besides the fact he kept him at DC?
These are the best candidates of the 50-60 applicants that were reported to apply? Or is this guy being set up for failure like the last coach was in hopes to get the old regime back? Hopefully the Valley View community is happy with this hire
The top 3 candidates that the posters on this thread wanted were: Stidham, Niswonger, and King
Stidham was let go from his assistant football and head boys basketball job by the publicly elected board due to, for the sake of being politically correct, being a poor role model for the kids. You can argue that there were agendas and blah, blah, blah, but the people that were elected by the community thought there was enough evidence to remove him from BOTH spots.
Niswonger who was ultra successful in the mid 90s, winning 4 state titles with the last one in 97 (if I remember correctly), which is 25 YEARS AGO (making those seniors 42-43 years old). Got let go in the early 2000s because he wasn't winning and had gone off the reservation. Bounced around and never stuck. Most recently was the OC at Beavercreek where the team went 0-10, scored 68 total points ALL SEASON, and never scored 20 points in a game ALL SEASON. Seems that he didn't adjust to game as time has gone by.
For the last candidate, I'll quote from an earlier post that was made to why the latest coach was let go... "Had nothing to do with scouting reports we have to much talent to go 5-6 leading at half in 5 of the 6 losses. Make no adjustments during the game or at halftime and got outscored 69-7 in the second half of the last three games." King was the DC correct? Isn't he directly responsible for the unit allowing those teams to score those 69 points?! Did he not make any halftime adjustments? Will he now since he's the new Head Coach? How is that a reflection on the latest coach besides the fact he kept him at DC?
These are the best candidates of the 50-60 applicants that were reported to apply? Or is this guy being set up for failure like the last coach was in hopes to get the old regime back? Hopefully the Valley View community is happy with this hire