TRUMP is TIMES MAN OF YEAR and RINGS MARKET BELL.

cabezadecaballo said:
“His driveway doesn’t go all the way to the street.

He’s a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

He’s not playing with a full deck.”

Pick another one, you insufferable boob.
Click to expand...
See, those make sense. Driveways extend to streets. Sandwiches are standard picnic fare. You play with a deck of cards.

I don't talk to houses. Do you? Is that an old guy thing I'm just not privy to yet?
 
oxat622 said:
See, those make sense. Driveways extend to streets. Sandwiches are standard picnic fare. You play with a deck of cards.

I don't talk to houses. Do you? Is that an old guy thing I'm just not privy to yet?
Click to expand...
Houses talk to me all of the time, but I don't respond. They can't hear.
 
oxat622 said:
You are conflating measles (the illness) with the measles virus. Just like you are conflating Covid-19 (the illness) with Sars Cov-2 (the virus). I would imagine you don't understand the difference between HIV and AIDS.

You take the measles vaccine so that your body can fight the measles virus THAT HAS BEEN TRANSMITTED TO YOU so that you do not become sick with measles.
Click to expand...
Then you don't contract the measles, and you never shed the virus, because the measles vaccine imparts actual immunity. That's what REAL vaccines do.
 
Steel Valley FB said:
Yes, he chose to align Trump with the negative when he could have done the opposite.
Click to expand...
Making this thread and the first post in this thread attempts to do the opposite already. That job was already done. But it's misguided and blatantly ignorant of what the "honor" signifies. Listing the negatives who have also held this title is merely a counterpoint. Did you forget you're in the Debate Forum?
Steel Valley FB said:
Better yet, he could have not even posted since his eventual explanation was that there’s no way to know without the benefit of hindsight. His liberal agenda was just to overwhelming for that, though.
Click to expand...
too

Lol. Sure. When TIME, an AMERICAN publication, bestowed the title to Adolf Hitler in 1938, it was surely to acknowledge his positive qualities. Like, stupid, of course hindsight has not been kind to Adolf Hitler. That does not change that in 1938 he was arguably the most influential person in the world.
 
oxat622 said:
So, stay with me, transmission does happen. Right?
Click to expand...
Post-vaccination with measles, the process of transmission may be begun by physically internalizing virus, but virus is unable to replicate adequately and grow in numbers, because that's what a real vaccine does. It imparts genuine immunity.

Covid jabs supposedly alleviate the symptoms of Covid disease, but one still contracts the SARS-CoV-2 virus, breeds virus, and sheds virus. That's not a vaccine, so the CDC changed their vaccine definition on behalf of Pfizer et al, in order to market mRNA jabs to weak-minded or semi-informed people with no need of the risk of messing with their mRNA over SARS-CoV-2 causing significant Covid disease.

Understand ?
 
Last edited:
underthelights said:
Man, how about that liberal news outlet of Time Magazine. Before you all get too excited, here are some other notable figures who were listed as Time's Man of the Year:
-Adolf Hitler in 1938
-Joseph Stalin in 1939 and 1942
-Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979
-Vladimir Putin in 2007
-Nikita Khrushchev in 1957

This is Trump's second time being Time Man of the Year. Congrats to him. It is impossible to argue he hasn't been influential, that is for sure. Time’s criteria focus on influence and significance, not morality or virtue. These choices underscore the profound impact individuals can have on history, even when their actions lead to negative consequences.
Click to expand...
The difference is the democrats celebrated those selections.
 
underthelights said:
They were not comparisons. It was being celebrated as if it were some kind of award and that Trump was being hailed as being positively influential. My point was that it only recognizes that he is influential. On another note, those people who were recognized that are now mostly universally as having a negative influence had highly energized followers as well. To think they believed they were “the bad guys” or supporting “the bad guys” would be credulous. We only benefit from the hindsight of history and that alone will tell the tale if there is a legitimate comparison to be had there, not me. Any assumptions or comparisons you’ve made are your own.
Click to expand...
You didn't message by using those examples?
 
cabezadecaballo said:
Post-vaccination with measles, the process of transmission may be begun by physically internalizing virus, but virus is unable to replicate adequately and grow in numbers, because that's what a real vaccine does. It imparts genuine immunity.
Click to expand...
Who is even arguing?
cabezadecaballo said:
Covid jabs supposedly alleviate the symptoms of Covid disease, but one still contracts the SARS-CoV-2 virus, breeds virus, and sheds virus. That's not a vaccine, so the CDC changed their vaccine definition on behalf of Pfizer et al, in order to market mRNA jabs to weak-minded or semi-informed people with no need of the risk of messing with their mRNA over SARS-CoV-2 causing significant Covid disease.

Understand ?
Click to expand...
I don't care.
 
underthelights said:
Man, how about that liberal news outlet of Time Magazine. Before you all get too excited, here are some other notable figures who were listed as Time's Man of the Year:
-Adolf Hitler in 1938
-Joseph Stalin in 1939 and 1942
-Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1979
-Vladimir Putin in 2007
-Nikita Khrushchev in 1957

This is Trump's second time being Time Man of the Year. Congrats to him. It is impossible to argue he hasn't been influential, that is for sure. Time’s criteria focus on influence and significance, not morality or virtue. These choices underscore the profound impact individuals can have on history, even when their actions lead to negative consequences.
Click to expand...
You forgot Obama in that list.
 
BlueJayFan said:
You would be correct if the award was actually called "MAN OF THE YEAR"

Again, moving too fast
Click to expand...
images.jpeg
 
oxat622 said:
Making this thread and the first post in this thread attempts to do the opposite already. That job was already done. But it's misguided and blatantly ignorant of what the "honor" signifies. Listing the negatives who have also held this title is merely a counterpoint. Did you forget you're in the Debate Forum?

too

Lol. Sure. When TIME, an AMERICAN publication, bestowed the title to Adolf Hitler in 1938, it was surely to acknowledge his positive qualities. Like, stupid, of course hindsight has not been kind to Adolf Hitler. That does not change that in 1938 he was arguably the most influential person in the world.
Click to expand...


I agree! I agree! Yes!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top