moonshadow
Active member
I did. Isn't that what everyone posts about your squad?You meant Paper tigers as a compliment? lol ok
I did. Isn't that what everyone posts about your squad?You meant Paper tigers as a compliment? lol ok
No, most people call them the Crusaders.I did. Isn't that what everyone posts about your squad?
“Yes facts!”Yes facts !
Massillon beat the #1 team in D1
Massillon’s only loss will be to the next #1 in D1
Massillon is one of the top 5 ranked teams in D2
Massillon is what you obsess over daily
I mean.... Fitch is obviously a really good team. But what about them makes you think they're a more complete team? Massillon has one of the best RB's in the state. A very good, albeit young QB. TONS of talent at receiver. Very good O and D lines. Very good LBs. and solid secondary. Athletes all over the field.. I haven't seen Fitch in person this year... but I just have a hard time seeing how they could be a more complete team?“Yes facts!”
...proceeds to make 4 statements of opinion.
In the spirit of opinions, I’ll share mine, too.
I have to think that Massillon will be riding high after a huge win in week 5. In my opinion, this momentum, coupled with playing at home in PBTS will allow the tigers to compete longer than some might expect. I do think the game gets away from Massillon towards the end of Q2 though, and eventually austintown pulls away and wins by 3-4 scores. I just think the “facts” are that austintown is a more complete team.
I guess 421 yds of offense on 7.0 yds per play against Ed’s wasn’t impressive enoughI mean.... Fitch is obviously a really good team. But what about them makes you think they're a more complete team? Massillon has one of the best RB's in the state. A very good, albeit young QB. TONS of talent at receiver. Very good O and D lines. Very good LBs. and solid secondary. Athletes all over the field.. I haven't seen Fitch in person this year... but I just have a hard time seeing how they could be a more complete team?
I'm not even saying Fitch can't win.. mostly bc its hard to win against a really good team the following week after a big emotional win... But St. Ed's is as good as anyone in the state. Massillon is playing better than they did week 1 against Moeller. Massillon is one of the best teams in the state. Hard to say my team who hasn't played near the schedule of yours is more complete.I guess 421 yds of offense on 7.0 yds per play against Ed’s wasn’t impressive enough
Yeah I also agree that Fitch is REALLY good and can win. I hope their fans and team are expecting a win and bring a huge crowd.I'm not even saying Fitch can't win.. mostly bc its hard to win against a really good team the following week after a big emotional win... But St. Ed's is as good as anyone in the state. Massillon is playing better than they did week 1 against Moeller. Massillon is one of the best teams in the state. Hard to say my team who hasn't played near the schedule of yours is more complete.
Are you going to offer Massillon +21-28 then ?“Yes facts!”
...proceeds to make 4 statements of opinion.
In the spirit of opinions, I’ll share mine, too.
I have to think that Massillon will be riding high after a huge win in week 5. In my opinion, this momentum, coupled with playing at home in PBTS will allow the tigers to compete longer than some might expect. I do think the game gets away from Massillon towards the end of Q2 though, and eventually austintown pulls away and wins by 3-4 scores. I just think the “facts” are that austintown is a more complete team.
Facts… then proceeds to say “I just think”I just think the “facts” are that austintown is a more complete team.
It's in their blood. Can't change that!I think the last few days has shown that no matter what Massillon does there will always be a group of people that will always find a way to downplay their accomplishments and provide backhanded compliments.
$2.2K — still pretty decent compared to most schools.How did that sloppiness breakdown…. Evenly for both teams? Also, what was the announced attendance? I would imagine 15-16,000 or more. Was the 50/50 over $8K? I went to a Tiger game one year, forget when, but the 50/50 was over $13K.
Glad you picked up on the irony. You do get it, right?Facts… then proceeds to say “I just think”![]()
Gambling on high school sports is frowned upon outside of the Massillon city limits.Are you going to offer Massillon +21-28 then ?
That’s why there are statewide point spreads released every week from bookies in Cleveland. It’s 2022 not 1964.Gambling on high school sports is frowned upon outside of the Massillon city limits.
Thang goodness for the rest of the state. If it were 1964, Massillon would already be hoisting the trophy.That’s why there are statewide point spreads released every week from bookies in Cleveland. It’s 2022 not 1964.
Back to that Massillon +21-28 though![]()
There you go again. First we’re not supposed to be able to compete with schools that have 3 times our enrollment. We are a D4 school with less than 800 students in the entire school. That said, when we compete with schools our size and in our division we win Championships. You cannot say the same about your beloved Massillon Tigers. Whether you believe it or not I have serious respect for Massillon. Have always rooted for them. Played against them. Both WHS & SHS are attacked and I feel like the fan bases are almost a brotherhood because lots of folks simply hate greatness and success. But, YOURE ONE OF THE HATERS. You always have something negative to say about The Big Red. The shots I take are responses to attacks.You shouldn’t be on this thread. This is about St. Edward and Massillon. Your Little Red would be lucky to score on these teams.
Yes, go away. New members are the worst. We want the same old dogs with the same musty takes who've all known each other since the days of dial up internet.Yet another "New Member". Go away -hat.
Let me explain. I'll try to go slow for you. If you notice, I put the words "new member" in quotations. Any normal human being would be able to figure out that I meant that as sarcasm and that it's not a new member at all. Make sense?Yes, go away. New members are the worst. We want the same old dogs with the same musty takes who've all known each other since the days of dial up internet.
This site hasn't had a true new member since 2010 id bet. lolLet me explain. I'll try to go slow for you. If you notice, I put the words "new member" in quotations. Any normal human being would be able to figure out that I meant that as sarcasm and that it's not a new member at all. Make sense?
Ha ha ha ha ha. Post of the year. And we're all the way to mid-September. Well done CrusaderZip0004.This site hasn't had a true new member since 2010 id bet. lol
Thanks for proving my point, fellas.This site hasn't had a true new member since 2010 id bet. lol
Nah .. You guys have done well proving ours.Thanks for proving my point, fellas.
What point? What they mean is that most "new member" accounts are actually 2nd 3rd and 4th or more accounts made by the usual trolls. But I expected that to go over the heads of most people on here. Don't feel bad because you didn't understand it, stay around for awhile and you'll see it for yourself, that is unless you are one of those made up accounts also.Thanks for proving my point, fellas.
How did you guys do against St. Ed?Yes, I agree.
But their game with St. Edward was sloppy. And that is what is being discussed right now.
Dope.Thanks for proving my point, fellas.