thePITman
Well-known member
Obviously there are a lot of factors that would play into this, but I wanted to bring up this topic to see everyone's thoughts.
to be interpreted as…Double elimination starting at the Sweet 16
Hmm, I never thought about that. Both have their advantages. Re-seeding and re-bracketing for a single 16-team (or 8-team) double elimination would be great, but it could also be terrible for travel. Schools would never go for this, IMO. Plus, what would you use to seed? The OHSBCA where you have to pay a due for a chance at being ranked?Is
to be interpreted as…
1) “the regionals’ and states’ competition each run as consecutive double-elimination tournaments”
or
2) “henceforth from the Sweet 16, the remaining stages of the tournament is a singular double-elimination bracket of 16 District Champions?”
The latter reading is a personally appealing idea.
In theory a double-elimination bracket (with any n teams being a power of 2) doesn’t have to be seeded. You can just randomly assign the districts to the lines.Hmm, I never thought about that. Both have their advantages. Re-seeding and re-bracketing for a single 16-team (or 8-team) double elimination would be great, but it could also be terrible for travel. Schools would never go for this, IMO. Plus, what would you use to seed? The OHSBCA where you have to pay a due for a chance at being ranked?
But a double elimination for each of the 4 regions might be more doable logistically.
I see where you’re coming from but, in the specific case of baseball, rule changes from above the OHSAA in the last decade changed the trajectory of what it takes to ultimately win a state title when NFHS banged the innings rule and went to pitch count. And one specific annoyance to that point is the fact the State Tournament in its current form only spans three days — but it’s still played on the rotating calendar of Divisions versus Timeslots. This year D4 semi’s are on Thursday (which is small school friendly) but the next two years it’ll be on Friday.I appreciate where everyone is coming from (i.e., for "the sake of discussion"), but how far are we willing to take this?
We've reached a point in our sports culture where we want to "fix" every possible situation that could ever possibly come up. In football...we've went from 4 to 8 to 16 teams per region and we all know...we are on the doorstep of letting EVERY team in. And not only that, there are plenty of people who want to eliminate regions and do a statewide top 32 in each region. In track, we've now allowed at-large bids to the state meet.
What's the next logical step to this? Where does it end?
Agree...I also like the strategy behind setting up your pitching for the "win or go home". I like the way it is.100% in favor of the single-elimination tournament.
I would go so far as to change MLB playoffs and NBA playoffs into single-elimination.
Something I've learned over the years is that the "best team" always wins the championship. Getting your name in the record books as the champion makes you the best team.
IMO, single elimination is by far the most exciting tournament. Every game matters. No one gets to take a day off or have an off day. It demands perfection and the team that puts it all together becomes the champion.
I'll be in the minority on this one, and I'm perfectly fine with that, but I'd be willing to guess that over half of the teams losing in the first round of the playoffs, never wanted to be there anyway. They are only playing the game because they were told to. They know the results coming and are probably frustrated at having to keep their season going just to be run ruled in a game they had to travel to get to.If you want a double elimination tourney don’t let everyone be in the postseason. That would be a first step. A second one would be any of this hinges on teams playing two games in one day in earlier rounds. For example sectionals. Play game one then two other teams play then the winners play on the same day. Moves up the timeline.
I would agree about the OHSAA. The tourney is not a big moneymaker. is what it is. Double elimination would be great from the Districts on. Four teams in each, maximum games would be 7 at each step:district, regional, state. Could be run thursday to sunday with no problem. NCAA was great how they run the regionals. They get them done in three days most of the time. Will never happen.The best of three for the final would be cool. And there is a ton of time between games during the tourney so we might be to pull off the best of 3. But honestly, I don't think baseball is all the important for the OHSAA. The season is regular 8 weeks long at best and he tourney is stretched out for 4 weeks. We work around the weather, graduation, prom, spring break and for many coaches development is not a priority. At some point it just gets to be too hard. Squeeze the tourney down a week would be my idea so summer ball could get started.
Not only is it not a big moneymaker, it lost money in 2017 and 2019... and made less than $10k in 2016 and 2018.I would agree about the OHSAA. The tourney is not a big moneymaker. is what it is.
This is very true. Imagine going in and knowing you’re playing what is an almost impossible game to win. Sure there’s upsets from time to time, but for the most part, those first round games are blowouts. Add to this the fact that because different divisions play on different days, you have teams who are still playing for conference titles during that first week. Heck, one year I had two teams who had already been eliminated from the postseason playing two games that had impact on the conference title for other teams. Add to it the weather related changes, especially the northern part of the state.I'll be in the minority on this one, and I'm perfectly fine with that, but I'd be willing to guess that over half of the teams losing in the first round of the playoffs, never wanted to be there anyway. They are only playing the game because they were told to. They know the results coming and are probably frustrated at having to keep their season going just to be run ruled in a game they had to travel to get to.
I'm all for everyone not making the tournament. Now where that cutoff line is, that's a discussion for another day.
Agree...and thats why I dont beleive the Walsh v Moeller game was the " state championship ". Anything can happenAnyone going to today's games knows that the team they are rooting for is just 7 innings away from being eliminated. That is the kind of buzz that single-elimination games create. Both teams are celebrating their previous win but know they could be the next team to be heading home. It is such a great system because everything is on the line in every game.
Yappi you dead on here brotha.100% in favor of the single-elimination tournament.
I would go so far as to change MLB playoffs and NBA playoffs into single-elimination.
Something I've learned over the years is that the "best team" always wins the championship. Getting your name in the record books as the champion makes you the best team.
IMO, single elimination is by far the most exciting tournament. Every game matters. No one gets to take a day off or have an off day. It demands perfection and the team that puts it all together becomes the champion.
That's one way to get the whole postseason over in a week100% in favor of the single-elimination tournament.
I would go so far as to change MLB playoffs and NBA playoffs into single-elimination.
Something I've learned over the years is that the "best team" always wins the championship. Getting your name in the record books as the champion makes you the best team.
IMO, single elimination is by far the most exciting tournament. Every game matters. No one gets to take a day off or have an off day. It demands perfection and the team that puts it all together becomes the champion.
So the argument would be that the best teams do have the pitching for a best of 3 series consecutively...which should be the point of finding a state champion, no?Not many high school teams having the pitching to play the best of 3 series consecutively.
In theory any team faced with a best-of-3 could just pitch ‘down’ the first game and hold the better arm(s) back in the event that they’re standing at X-1. Go 2-1-3, 3-1-2 or the even more rare slate of 2-3-1 (as in they slate the ‘2’ or ‘3’ arm in game 1, game 2 pitcher is contingent on result of game 1 a la game 1 is won.)So the argument would be that the best teams do have the pitching for a best of 3 series consecutively...which should be the point of finding a state champion, no?