I think you do. Whatever the result, the Russian people will decide whether they won or lost.You don't have to be.
I think you do. Whatever the result, the Russian people will decide whether they won or lost.You don't have to be.
Americans troops took BenzedrineAnd you figure the Nazi's won the war because of it?
Interesting.
Did the Nazis win in your world ?Nazis Dosed Soldiers with Performance-Boosting 'Superdrug'
The remarkable endurance of German and Allied soldiers during World War II had a secret ingredient.www.livescience.com
Yeah, that's why.Americans troops took Benzedrine
Nazi troops took Pervitin
Benzedrine is better. America wins
is al-Jezeera there ?Anyone know the true number of loses n both sides of this conflict?
Good luck getting any reliable information.
I got this from Newsweek.. The information is from Ukraine.. LOL.. How about an independent source.. Nah.. why would any US new source be into that?
Russia losses in Ukraine pass new deadly milestone: Kyiv
Ukraine's armed forces have reported a spike in Russian losses in the war over the last two months.www.newsweek.com
The number of Russian troop losses since the start of Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine has surpassed 150,000, according to Kyiv.
This is a joke right? Kyiv says? Huh? You might as well say the Japs and or Germans say in 1944.
Anyone have a nonUS, nonUkraine, nonRussian report link?
Highland Schools product.Yeah, that's why.
is al-Jezeera there ?
I heard that several years ago. I have no doubt there is some truth to it just not sure how much truth.Nazis Dosed Soldiers with Performance-Boosting 'Superdrug'
The remarkable endurance of German and Allied soldiers during World War II had a secret ingredient.www.livescience.com
That's fantastic!
Why is it a joke?Anyone know the true number of loses n both sides of this conflict?
Good luck getting any reliable information.
I got this from Newsweek.. The information is from Ukraine.. LOL.. How about an independent source.. Nah.. why would any US new source be into that?
Russia losses in Ukraine pass new deadly milestone: Kyiv
Ukraine's armed forces have reported a spike in Russian losses in the war over the last two months.www.newsweek.com
The number of Russian troop losses since the start of Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine has surpassed 150,000, according to Kyiv.
This is a joke right? Kyiv says? Huh? You might as well say the Japs and or Germans say in 1944.
Anyone have a nonUS, nonUkraine, nonRussian report link?
This is one of those cases where you can't just read the headline you gotta read the articleDid the Nazis win in your world ?
You said the war was won on performance enhancing substances
This is one of those cases where you can't just read the headline you gotta read the article
Agreed. I know many troops were on it. Not sure what % of the Manhattan project members were on it... The number wasn't zero...I heard that several years ago. I have no doubt there is some truth to it just not sure how much truth.
Does Russia even have a military doctrine? Their military is not professional in the way that ours is. I mean their forces are certainly nothing to sneeze at or else this war would be long over. But that's always been my big fear about this conflict -- something happening accidentally.Russian military doctrine does not accept that the limited use of battlefield nukes will lead to a full scale world wide nuclear war.
Does Russia even have a military doctrine? Their military is not professional in the way that ours is. I mean their forces are certainly nothing to sneeze at or else this war would be long over. But that's always been my big fear about this conflict -- something happening accidentally.
Of course they do. And it's a lot like the Soviet Unions was. It is well known that there are circumstances under which the Russians would use nuclear weapons on the battlefield. That they view the use of these weapons under certain circumstances as not likely to lead to a broader global nuclear conflict.Does Russia even have a military doctrine? Their military is not professional in the way that ours is. I mean their forces are certainly nothing to sneeze at or else this war would be long over. But that's always been my big fear about this conflict -- something happening accidentally.
You mean like when they were being routed in Kharkiv?Of course they do. And it's a lot like the Soviet Unions was. It is well known that there are circumstances under which the Russians would use nuclear weapons on the battlefield. That they view the use of these weapons under certain circumstances as not likely to lead to a broader global nuclear conflict.
I would be surprised if the Russians didn't use nukes IN Ukraine if they were on the verge of a comprehensive conventional military defeat.
No that was a major setback but far from a comprehensive conventional military defeat. I mean last I looked the Russians have recovered from that defeat and appear to have some momentum in moving forward in Ukraine.You mean like when they were being routed in Kharkiv?
Perfect timing for this article. It does a good job laying out Russia's position on and capability in using battlefield nukes. Interesting point about how if the blast is airborne Russian troops could move through the area in a day:Does Russia even have a military doctrine? Their military is not professional in the way that ours is. I mean their forces are certainly nothing to sneeze at or else this war would be long over. But that's always been my big fear about this conflict -- something happening accidentally.
When you control all news and health care of your soldiers, no one worries about a few extra zoomies. Remember the Russkie boneheads playing around in the red forest fallout zone downwind of Chernobyl ? If they were just some semi-literate farm rubes, they may never understand what they were exposed to, even if latent radiation sickness of some sort presents itself.Perfect timing for this article. It does a good job laying out Russia's position on and capability in using battlefield nukes. Interesting point about how if the blast is airborne Russian troops could move through the area in a day:
While some argue that Putin will never use nuclear weapons, the Kremlin’s (2020) “Basic Principles of State Policy of the Russian Federation on Nuclear Deterrence” reveal how Moscow plans to use nuclear weapons far beyond just to deter existential threats. Putin’s repeated nuclear threats are in line with Russian policy. In the escalating crisis between Russia, Ukraine, and the United States, Putin’s next move may be a low altitude air burst of a low-yield nuclear weapon.
Today, Russia possesses at least 2,000 battlefield nuclear weapons of varying yields that are launched from delivery vehicles like the Iskander-M ballistic missile, which has seen its conventional version used in Ukraine. These battlefield nuclear weapons are designed to affect small areas and achieve discreet destruction on the battlefield. They are very different from the strategic nuclear weapons which inspire Hollywood Armageddon movies.
Our best hope is that China is hamstrung by their serious demographic crisis. Of course while they will see their population collapse in the coming decades we'll be watching our society drown in a woke cesspool of our own making.China is leading the world it seems. What a cluster @#$%
It's like the Biden administration doesn't understand even the most basic elements of a foreign policy conducted in support of American interests. China & Russia joining up was never in our interests. In fact a competent foreign policy would be working tirelessly to keep those two at each others throats. I guess hating Putin and supporting Ukraine trump everything else.China is leading the world it seems. What a cluster @#$%