You always claim the 2001 LBP team to be the greatest team in the history of Poly football. Here is a link to a person who has as much knowledge as anyone, and watched the 97 and 01 teams. He also agrees with me. Here is the link.
http://calhisports.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?SID=1113&fid=1759&style=2&tid=116191487&Page=2
You never watched neither the 97 or 01 teams in person. Which even makes it more pathetic. When you open your mouth about who is better.
folks this goes back to steeler trying to explain away SLC's loss after Dodger got hurt
I ventured winning teams overcome adversity
I used some well known teams who won games or championships after their leader was injured
he said this is a high school thread
I posted dls beating ecu after their starting qb got injured
he said well dls is a running team, a veer team, infering the dls example does not count (note he says a passing pro team does not count, he says a passing college team does not count, he says a running high school, team does not count) I guess if I added another example he would say well that team is from state xyz and slc plays in texas and so on and so on
seems to me a qb is pretty darn important in a veer option attack, i guess he can't see that although the qb makes the reads and dishes the ball, oh DLS QBs pass too, just not 40 times a game
he then argues forever about whether dls is a run oriented or pass oriented
using ONLY how many pass plays a team calls as a way to measure
now he wants to argue about which LB Poly team is better
It will be opinions only as LB Poly 1997 can not play LB Poly 2001
if he doesnt continue to move the debate FAR away from the original point he posts personal attacks
____________________________________
here is my repsonse
what does LB Poly have to do with whether SLC was able to overcome an injury???
what does DLS games in 2007, 2001, 1998, 1989 or 1979 have to do with whether SLC was unable to overcome an injury
WHAT??????????????????????????????????????????????