Taft (this year) is/was a lot like (a Division IV version of) the Pickerington Central teams of a couple of years ago-- very simple scheme, no imagination, doing basically one thing-- and trying to rely on superior athletes to just overwhelm their opponents. Taft was Pick Central-lite (circa 2016-2020)-- with similar quality of coaching, athletes, scheme, and execution...
(IMO) It's likely that Taft fielded better athletes than Steubenville will-- but did not have better coaching and execution-- Steubenville (from what I have heard-- I've not seen them) will come in with far better execution (due to more competent coaching) than Taft-- but (also, from what I have heard) the scheme will not be that much more complex than Taft's...
So, I'd handicap this game as a Steubenville trying to do what Taft did (scheme-wise), with lesser athleticism, but better coaching and execution... It remains to be seen if Steubenville's (presumably) better coaching can make up for that lesser athletic ability with better execution, to allow Steubenville to get over the hump that Taft could not...
Yes, Taft was far and away the best team that Wyoming faced this year-- and yes, Wyoming faced a LOT of bad teams this year (a product of the weak league that Wyoming is in, which they can do little about)-- but Taft IS a very talented (and, dare I say, very good) Division IV team...I tend to doubt those (posting here) who presume that Steubenville will be notably tougher to beat than Taft... we'll know after this game, if Steubenville or Taft is "the toughest team Wyoming has played this year"...