A soldier dismissed from the Army allegedly said he enlisted to become 'more proficient in killing' Black people

lotr10

Well-known member
Perfect. Maybe we can downsize and get our ridiculous defense spending under control.
Yea that's the ticket and if we get in a shooting war with China or Russia or Iran we can send all the diversity officers to the front lines. I'm sure they'll kick butt.
 

ProV1

Well-known member
Yea that's the ticket and if we get in a shooting war with China or Russia or Iran we can send all the diversity officers to the front lines. I'm sure they'll kick butt.
Not sure why we should keep spending when you wont recommend service.

BTW … I’m not worried about a shooting war with Russia. Ukraine is kicking their butts right now. We will not have a war with China in the next 100 years at minimum. They need us and we need them. Better to accept reality and act accordingly.
 

jmog

Well-known member
He said there were good people on both sides of the protests.

All Mexicans coming over the border are not rapists and thieves. Very few are.

I answered your question. Now answer my question. Is it racist to call for the death sentence for black kids falsely accused of a crime AFTER you know that they have been fully exonerated via DNA evidence?
You just proved the point.
He directly said the good people on both sides of the protest BEFORE the neo-Nazis showed up and condemned them before and after that statement.

In case you didn’t know, and judging by your ignorance you didn’t, the Nazis showed up the second day after the protestors on both sides had a peaceful day.

He directly referenced this by saying good people on both sides and THEN the Nazis showed up.

Please tell me you aren’t that stupid are you?

Answer that question, do you recognize you were wrong earlier about “both sides” now that the full text has been posted here, or are you doubling down on your ignorance?
 

ProV1

Well-known member
You just proved the point.
He directly said the good people on both sides of the protest BEFORE the neo-Nazis showed up and condemned them before and after that statement.

In case you didn’t know, and judging by your ignorance you didn’t, the Nazis showed up the second day after the protestors on both sides had a peaceful day.

He directly referenced this by saying good people on both sides and THEN the Nazis showed up.

Please tell me you aren’t that stupid are you?

Answer that question, do you recognize you were wrong earlier about “both sides” now that the full text has been posted here, or are you doubling down on your ignorance?
You seem to infer that the counter protesters were made up of “lot’s of great people” and then a separate group of nazis. I don’t subscribe to that line of thinking. I think there were protesters and counter protesters. The counter protesters were one group of traitor supporters with a whole bunch of Nazis mixed in. There were two sides not three and everybody chose their side. You are either down with the Nazis or with the other side. As such, there were not good people on each side.

Now answer my question: Is it racist to call for the death sentence for black kids falsely accused of a crime AFTER you know that they have been fully exonerated via DNA evidence?
 

jmog

Well-known member
You seem to infer that the counter protesters were made up of “lot’s of great people” and then a separate group of nazis. I don’t subscribe to that line of thinking. I think there were protesters and counter protesters. The counter protesters were one group of traitor supporters with a whole bunch of Nazis mixed in. There were two sides not three and everybody chose their side. You are either down with the Nazis or with the other side. As such, there were not good people on each side.

Now answer my question: Is it racist to call for the death sentence for black kids falsely accused of a crime AFTER you know that they have been fully exonerated via DNA evidence?
Sorry, but you can’t make up your own “truth” or “reality” that is not what happened and you know it but you just are trying to be right.

I wont answer your BS questions until you admit reality.
 

Thavoice

Well-known member
Yea that's the ticket and if we get in a shooting war with China or Russia or Iran we can send all the diversity officers to the front lines. I'm sure they'll kick butt.
And all the right. Prolly like half the military.....right?
 

chs1971

Well-known member
You just proved the point.
He directly said the good people on both sides of the protest BEFORE the neo-Nazis showed up and condemned them before and after that statement.

In case you didn’t know, and judging by your ignorance you didn’t, the Nazis showed up the second day after the protestors on both sides had a peaceful day.

He directly referenced this by saying good people on both sides and THEN the Nazis showed up.

Please tell me you aren’t that stupid are you?

Answer that question, do you recognize you were wrong earlier about “both sides” now that the full text has been posted here, or are you doubling down on your ignorance?
Trump was clearly and specifically talking about the debate over Confederate statues. A rational and sober person can agree with Trump on this. A woke progressive cannot.
 

ProV1

Well-known member
Sorry, but you can’t make up your own “truth” or “reality” that is not what happened and you know it but you just are trying to be right.

I wont answer your BS questions until you admit reality.
I did not make up my own reality. There were two sides. Supporters of the USA vs Supporters of for the celebration of traitors. The neo nazis sided with the traitor supporters.

You wont answer my question because you are a liar hack.
 

jmog

Well-known member
I did not make up my own reality. There were two sides. Supporters of the USA vs Supporters of for the celebration of traitors. The neo nazis sided with the traitor supporters.

You wont answer my question because you are a liar hack.
I literally posted proof you are lying with the actual text of the press conference and you won’t admit it. Just stop posting it just makes you look dumber by the minute.
 

ProV1

Well-known member
I literally posted proof you are lying with the actual text of the press conference and you won’t admit it. Just stop posting it just makes you look dumber by the minute.
Let’s say I interpret his words as you say he intended. That he was only talking about neo nazis. Done. I don't believe neo nazis were the only problem with the counter protesters. As such, I and many other people, have a huge problem with him equating both sides. One side was on the neo Nazi team and the other side was not. Now answer my question you coward.
 

jmog

Well-known member
Let’s say I interpret his words as you say he intended. That he was only talking about neo nazis. Done. I don't believe neo nazis were the only problem with the counter protesters. As such, I and many other people, have a huge problem with him equating both sides. One side was on the neo Nazi team and the other side was not. Now answer my question you coward.
You still won’t admit you were wrong when it is in plain English. Stop being the coward you are causing me of being.
 

Redandgold

Well-known member
He condemned all white supremacists and neo-Nazis IN THAT PRESS CONFERENCE no less than 2 times.

So again, did you not read it or are you a moron, because with me giving a link to the whole text there are literally no other options.
He has never condemned them by name. I’m talking about his boys, the little Proud Cowards. Or, for that matter any white supremacist organization by name. Show me one of those quotes. Not possible. Keep supporting that racist, lying, thieving, traitor, as he continues to grift from you morons.
 
U

username123

Guest
He has never condemned them by name. I’m talking about his boys, the little Proud Cowards. Or, for that matter any white supremacist organization by name. Show me one of those quotes. Not possible. Keep supporting that racist, lying, thieving, traitor, as he continues to grift from you morons.
BLM are domestic terrorists that you love. Own it
 

jmog

Well-known member
He has never condemned them by name. I’m talking about his boys, the little Proud Cowards. Or, for that matter any white supremacist organization by name. Show me one of those quotes. Not possible. Keep supporting that racist, lying, thieving, traitor, as he continues to grift from you morons.
You were talking about Charlottesville moron, stick to the topic. You were proven wrong with the actual text and moved the goalposts rather than admitting you were a moron.

And he literally condemned white supremacists IN THAT LINKED PRESS CONFERENCE.

No way you are that stupid are you?
 

chs1971

Well-known member
He has never condemned them by name. I’m talking about his boys, the little Proud Cowards. Or, for that matter any white supremacist organization by name. Show me one of those quotes. Not possible. Keep supporting that racist, lying, thieving, traitor, as he continues to grift from you morons.
Stop being stupid.

FJB condemned me by name so F him. Tim Ryan too, and F you too for voting for them.
 
Last edited:

ProV1

Well-known member
You still won’t admit you were wrong when it is in plain English. Stop being the coward you are causing me of being.
Lol. I just answered your question in plain english. It was fully explained. You obviously have no response and are to big a wuss to answer my question. What a pathetic excuse for a man.
 

Redandgold

Well-known member
You were talking about Charlottesville moron, stick to the topic. You were proven wrong with the actual text and moved the goalposts rather than admitting you were a moron.

And he literally condemned white supremacists IN THAT LINKED PRESS CONFERENCE.

No way you are that stupid are you?
Not by name. You know the game. You guys are pathetic. You would defend a white supremacist, or someone who supports them, by playing word games. What a bunch of A holes.
 

gobluetom

Well-known member
You were talking about Charlottesville moron, stick to the topic. You were proven wrong with the actual text and moved the goalposts rather than admitting you were a moron.

And he literally condemned white supremacists IN THAT LINKED PRESS CONFERENCE.

No way you are that stupid are you?
Your post was correct except for the bolded part.
 

SayMyName

Well-known member
Lol. I just answered your question in plain english. It was fully explained. You obviously have no response and are to big a wuss to answer my question. What a pathetic excuse for a man.
river humber hull GIF by David Firth
 

jmog

Well-known member
Lol. I just answered your question in plain english. It was fully explained. You obviously have no response and are to big a wuss to answer my question. What a pathetic excuse for a man.
No you didn’t, you moved the goalposts.

The plain text of the press conference proves you were wrong. Feel free to admit it anytime.
 

jmog

Well-known member
Not by name. You know the game. You guys are pathetic. You would defend a white supremacist, or someone who supports them, by playing word games. What a bunch of A holes.
Again, he denounce them all, period. It was in plain text in the press conference link I shared.

Care to admit you were wrong yet? Or just going to keep on lying?
 

Redandgold

Well-known member
But you never say who you are talking about by name. How pathetic. What an A hole you are.
I’m talking about Trump cult members. And, I’m talking about Trump never condemning the Proud Boys or any other racist group by name. Like I said, show me that quote.
 
.
Top