SWOhioHoops
Member
Princeton vs Kings: PRINCETON
MND vs Wayne: MND
Mason vs Cville: MASON
WW vs Boro: BORO
MND vs Wayne: MND
Mason vs Cville: MASON
WW vs Boro: BORO
This is a pretty wild statement in my opinion.Yes, I do. Princeton has been on cruise control for a few weeks now, that is why I say Kings stands the best chance of any in knocking them out. I don't think we see a Mason vs Princeton Regional Final. If so, I would take Princeton by 10+.
I have literally no affiliation with anyone Princeton plays, but your response just tells me you know my statement is correct.Sounds like someone has sour grapes WOMP WOMP.
Agree that Kings should give Princeton a battle (LY Reg Final Rematch), if they can limit TurnoversYes, I do. Princeton has been on cruise control for a few weeks now, that is why I say Kings stands the best chance of any in knocking them out. I don't think we see a Mason vs Princeton Regional Final. If so, I would take Princeton by 10+.
Anything can happen this deep in the tourney. However, Kings best opponent this season that most closely resembles Princeton is Winton Woods. Both have dominant bigs, long wings, and athletic guards. Kings didn’t match up well with WW in two games. I don’t think this game is particularly close unless Kings shoots the lights out and Princeton tries to coast. Princeton also has the added benefit of having played 3 straight at Lakota East. Princeton decides to turn it up and wins by 20.Yes, I do. Princeton has been on cruise control for a few weeks now, that is why I say Kings stands the best chance of any in knocking them out. I don't think we see a Mason vs Princeton Regional Final. If so, I would take Princeton by 10+.
Can't get swept by Lebanon and lose to Milford and complain about the computers.Kings showing the RPI seeding system was flawed. So far, they've easily handled the #5 seed WC and #6 LW. A shame they didn't get to avoid Princeton this early but if any team in Cincinnati has a chance at knocking them out, I think Kings stands a better chance than MND or Mason. I see Springboro vs Princeton/ Kings winner in Regional Finals.
Still think scheduling plays a massive role when talking about tournament readiness. The 5, 6, and 7 seeds played arguable the worst non-conference schedule of any teams in the top 10, all 3 lost in the tournament by 15+ and are sitting at home on district day… was playing an easy schedule worth getting the higher seed?Can't get swept by Lebanon and lose to Milford and complain about the computers.
Wasn’t speaking about Ross? Goshen played 3 games against D1 non-conference opponents and it was Belbrook, Mt. Healthy, and Talawanda. Played 7 Non-D1 schools non-conference. 0 games that would simulate a sectional final type game.Who do you think Ross and Goshen would have needed to play to beat Princeton and Mason? Didn't Kings and West Clermont play nearly the same schedule? I am not disrespecting or disagreeing with your point about scheduling, but I do not believe it is a massive factor for tournament success.
I tend to agree with most others, the schedules aren't the problem.Wasn’t speaking about Ross? Goshen played 3 games against D1 non-conference opponents and it was Belbrook, Mt. Healthy, and Talawanda. Played 7 Non-D1 schools non-conference. 0 games that would simulate a sectional final type game.
Lakota West non-conference:
A JV team from Australia that didn’t even count.
3 walk-thru games in Florida
A D2 team from Toledo
A 10-11 Toledo Notre Dame team
0 games that would simulate a sectional final type experience.
West Clermont non-conference:
Seton, Mt. Healthy, Talawanda, Canada team, Ursuline, Canal Winchester.
Canal Winchester is a solid win, but overall really weak for a team that was favored by seed to win their sectional (again).
Kings at least played Fairmont, Wayne, and Bellbrook non-conference.
Winton Woods, Princeton, MND, Mason all step up and play each other in the regular season. Springboro played East, Purcell, and a gauntlet tourney over Christmas. Centerville put Olmsted Falls and MND on the schedule. Coincidence that they’re all playing on District day?
So doesn’t this argument prove the point that the RPI is flawed? Kings is the better team? And they weren’t even in the top 10?I tend to agree with most others, the schedules aren't the problem.
Kings also played Edgewood, Sycamore and McNick, which are similar to West Clermont playing Talawanda, Mt Healthy and Ursuline, and the games against Canal Winchester, Canada Team, and Seton are similar to Kings playing Bellbrook, Fairmont, Wayne
Last year, Kings played Wilmington, McNick, Bellbrook, Sycamore, Fairmont, Edgewood, while West Clermont played Lakota East, Magnificat, Newark, Western Brown, Seton, and Ursuline(who was 20-5 the year before), so really not much difference
What's the difference then??? Two things.....#1 Ingram = STAR, when Kings plays they most likely have the BEST player on both ends of the floor, this year and last and #2, and I know this wont be very popular for some, and no disrespect to WC but they really are just ok. Other than Hale, who would you pick to start for Kings, or any other top ECC team??? Same with West, I think they have 2 stars, BUT they are young, to young to win against seasoned vets. It will be interesting to see if Hale can be WCs version of Ingram as she heads into her junior season.
Even last season, I would take Kings 2 senior guards(4 yr starters) the big kid Wells, and Ingram over WCs squad, other than Hale who was still just a frosh. I think the Hicks kid was WAY OVERATED against other kids who matched her physicality, because she wasn't an overly skilled player. Even the Swisshelm kid had severe athleticism issues, Ingram was better than her last year as a junior, she just does more things
To further prove the point, Kings had basically the same line up 3 seasons ago, Juniors - Rawlings, Barnett, Wells, and Sophomores - Ingram, Marchal, Drew. And they lost in the 1st round 42-32 to Walnut who was 7-15 that season and played what you called a weak non conference schedule.
Kings was fortunate to have 2 good classes back to back, but they had to grow and mature before they could make some noise as seniors and juniors.
Next year will be interesting to see how they fill the shoes of Ingram and the other experienced players they lose
Everyone is all for taking out the human element of the voting… until factors don’t get taken in to account with the new seeding.
West Clermont sits at 5 after losing to Kings twice, @ Walnut, @ Winton Woods. Beat Lebanon and Walnut Hills both without their best players playing a single minute. Loss to Canadian team didn’t count toward their record. Taken to OT @ home by Milford. Good wins against Winton Woods, Lebanon the first time, and Canal Winchester. Feasted on the bottom half of the ECC and a really bad non conference schedule otherwise.
Lakota West goes 1-5 against East, Mason, and Princeton, with the 1 win being a MASSIVE RPI boost when Princeton was missing half their starters. Feasts on the bottom half of the GMC and a poor non conference schedule.
What proof was there that in a normal seeding with human elements that those 2 teams were better than Kings? Especially when looking at head to head.
Moving forward, what gives Dan Wallace the motivation to schedule Pick Central, MND, Alter, and Springboro? If he played Seton, Mt. Healthy, and Talawanda like everyone else ranked ahead of him, he would’ve been a top 5 seed and would be playing in a district game no doubt in my mind. Sets a precedent moving forward.
The big flaw with the RPI is using the total before the season is complete. Kings win over Fairmont didnt count. Wests losses to Mason and Princeton didnt count...because they were after the draw. Maybe kings and West flip if all the games countedSo doesn’t this argument prove the point that the RPI is flawed? Kings is the better team? And they weren’t even in the top 10?
Honestly I was kind of impressed with the season WC had considering they lost their whole starting 5 from last year and only returned 4 players with real varsity experience.Everyone is all for taking out the human element of the voting… until factors don’t get taken in to account with the new seeding.
West Clermont sits at 5 after losing to Kings twice, @ Walnut, @ Winton Woods. Beat Lebanon and Walnut Hills both without their best players playing a single minute. Loss to Canadian team didn’t count toward their record. Taken to OT @ home by Milford. Good wins against Winton Woods, Lebanon the first time, and Canal Winchester. Feasted on the bottom half of the ECC and a really bad non conference schedule otherwise.
Lakota West goes 1-5 against East, Mason, and Princeton, with the 1 win being a MASSIVE RPI boost when Princeton was missing half their starters. Feasts on the bottom half of the GMC and a poor non conference schedule.
What proof was there that in a normal seeding with human elements that those 2 teams were better than Kings? Especially when looking at head to head.
Moving forward, what gives Dan Wallace the motivation to schedule Pick Central, MND, Alter, and Springboro? If he played Seton, Mt. Healthy, and Talawanda like everyone else ranked ahead of him, he would’ve been a top 5 seed and would be playing in a district game no doubt in my mind. Sets a precedent moving forward.
How much do you think the 22 regular season game max has to do with scheduling tougher matches along with the AD's just wanting to get the schedule filled. Outside the schools you mention at the top, how much do the teams schedule really change from year to year.The hardest thing for schools to do is develop a “program” that enables them to play a consistent difficult schedule
It doesn’t happen overnight and most game contracts are at least 2 years (Home & Home) it takes time (decade of success)
Lakota East, Springboro and Bellbrook recently have all been successful with great players and able to develop a reputation of winning and being competitive
Hence the ability to elevate their programs via tougher scheduling
But in all teams cases you can’t do anything about your league’s competitiveness (Bellbrook, Goshen, Harrison, MND)
Good point - especially for those in large conferences. For example, GMC teams have to play 16 conference games, which doesn’t leave much for a decent non-conference schedule.How much do you think the 22 regular season game max has to do with scheduling tougher matches along with the AD's just wanting to get the schedule filled. Outside the schools you mention at the top, how much do the teams schedule really change from year to year.
I would guess the reason is because the SW district board is living in the 1980s. They either don't realize or don't care about the popularity/attendance for these DI games. They continue to play these games at a HS that cant accommodate the crowds, so they have to move it to 2 nights to make it work. Reason being is that fans from all teams will show up early/stay after to watch the other games.Regional Matchups are pretty much Chalk!
Wouldn’t have been surprised either way with Boro/Winton Woods outcome.
Still don’t understand why SW OH D1 is ONLY Regional in the state (any division) that plays Semifinals on 2 nights instead of both games on 1 night.
Pure money grab?
See a Princeton win over MND
But MND may have played best game of season in District Finals
Boro/Mason is a toss up to me
As mentioned previously Boro has lost to Mason last 5 times they’ve met since 20-21, last 3 seasons in District Finals
Springboro will be highly motivated to break that streak!
3 very animated coaches, officiating will be very interesting. Springboro coach seems very even keeled.
How much leeway will officials allow on questioning calls?
In my opinion (which means nothing) Princeton’s entire staff has gotten out of hand with complaining on high majority of calls
Don’t know that I’ve seen MND or Mason asst coaches say much of anything.
Head coaches at MND and Mason are obviously a different story
Officiating has been horrible on the girls side. Lets be honest. At this point of the season, Oshaa should be putting the best officials on the court.Regional Matchups are pretty much Chalk!
Wouldn’t have been surprised either way with Boro/Winton Woods outcome.
Still don’t understand why SW OH D1 is ONLY Regional in the state (any division) that plays Semifinals on 2 nights instead of both games on 1 night.
Pure money grab?
See a Princeton win over MND
But MND may have played best game of season in District Finals
Boro/Mason is a toss up to me
As mentioned previously Boro has lost to Mason last 5 times they’ve met since 20-21, last 3 seasons in District Finals
Springboro will be highly motivated to break that streak!
3 very animated coaches, officiating will be very interesting. Springboro coach seems very even keeled.
How much leeway will officials allow on questioning calls?
In my opinion (which means nothing) Princeton’s entire staff has gotten out of hand with complaining on high majority of calls
Don’t know that I’ve seen MND or Mason asst coaches say much of anything.
Head coaches at MND and Mason are obviously a different story
Regional Matchups are pretty much Chalk!
Wouldn’t have been surprised either way with Boro/Winton Woods outcome.
Still don’t understand why SW OH D1 is ONLY Regional in the state (any division) that plays Semifinals on 2 nights instead of both games on 1 night.
Pure money grab?
The SW district board has absolutely no say in regionals. Regionals are run by the OHSAA.I would guess the reason is because the SW district board is living in the 1980s. They either don't realize or don't care about the popularity/attendance for these DI games. They continue to play these games at a HS that cant accommodate the crowds, so they have to move it to 2 nights to make it work. Reason being is that fans from all teams will show up early/stay after to watch the other games.
And all of this while the boys continue to play districts at Xavier and Dayton, and the girls cant even get out of a HS venue for the regional, its a joke.
Its also hilarious that they take THREE weeks to play 3 games in a sectional, and now they play district on Saturday, and turn around and play the regional semis on Tuesday!!! Where are the people who said you had to have the draw early so teams could prepare, because Sunday draw to 1st sectional game on Tuesday was not enough time to prepare for all the 1st round blowouts, but now you get to the biggest games of the season, and you have to practice Sunday and Monday to try to get ready for Tuesday. Amazing stuff!
The regional game sites have been posted on the OHSAA website for months..... From the beginning, Princeton and Lakota West were listed as venues to be used. Medina is/was the only site listed.If Regionals are run by OHSAA.
HOW can Medina host Regionals and play a home game (tonight beat Uniontown Lake) in said Regional Semi Final?
And will play a Home game in D1 Regional Final vs Magnificat on Saturday?
But Princeton (rightfully so) can not?
OHSAA making a specific rule in SW Region but not in all Regions?
Make it make sense!
Because the Regional sites have been listed for months that makes it right?The regional game sites have been posted on the OHSAA website for months..... From the beginning, Princeton and Lakota West were listed as venues to be used. Medina is/was the only site listed.
Maybe no other site offered up their venue in the event that a conflict arose from a team(s) advancing?