This post has very little to do with our conversation. Your original post I responded to said the WBL was "weak this year," and I responded explaining why I thought the WBL actually had a pretty strong season. This post here is talking about how Kirtland is a MAC-like team, which nobody is refuting. You're comparing the WBL to the MAC and since the WBL isn't as good as the MAC, that makes them a "weak" league? It's either you're the MAC or the GCL or you're a nobody? Well, that's a hell of a narrow definition for whether a league is good or not and lacks any complex analysis. How many other leagues not named the MAC had 2 of their members in a regional championship game this past weekend or how many leagues had 40% of their members have 9+ wins? I'm sure there absolutely were some, but I guarantee I can name more leagues that didn't.