I agree. We are heading down the path of 1930's Germany....but I don’t think that means what you think it does.If the statists on here get their way, yup. The US is going down the path of 1930s Germany.
"papers! now!"
Correct. Masks are more effective in protecting others from you. Which is why surgeons have worn masks for 100 years.They help. The mandate, though, is to prevent your infectious particles from entering someone else's body. Ask your doctor. She agrees with me.
Build a wall along Washington and Athens Counties; and make Marietta pay for it!They just applied to the TVC. I’ll remind our school board to make sure Marietta doesn’t get in
Paul, I was there, you were not. My point stands. I will give you credit for making the call, no matter how pathetic it appears.They help. The mandate, though, is to prevent your infectious particles from entering someone else's body. Ask your doctor. She agrees with me.
So, was the doctor lying to you or Paul?Paul, I was there, you were not. My point stands. I will give you credit for making the call, no matter how pathetic it appears.
Of course not, Paul. You don't think anything means what it means.I agree. We are heading down the path of 1930's Germany....but I don’t think that means what you think it does.
Further down in the article
"Many people have claimed that chronic respiratory illnesses — like asthma and COPD — would make it too difficult to breathe through masks, but according to doctors, that isn't the case.
"I have a pulmonary clinic where I see patients with advanced lung diseases, and everyone wears a mask and can breathe," Cooper said. "People with respiratory conditions should wear masks because they're the ones we especially don't want catching COVID-19."
most true statement on here hahahaNot that unusual. Fans at youth sporting events aren’t always the best behaved.
My doctor told me that masks DO NOT stop infectious particles from entering one's body. That is what she told ol' Paul, too. Give gramps credit though, he followed through. Nice job, Paul. We now have quite a story to tell. You'll have to lie when telling it, but none-the-less.So, was the doctor lying to you or Paul?
Ok, Mr. the school won't pay and this wasn't mishandled.Says who? You’ve been proven to be not a credible source by many on here.
TBH, from my own experience, I’ve probably seen more incidents requiring intervention at sparsely attended events. That type of setting allows fans to more directly interact with players, coaches and officials.most true statement on here hahaha
Move the Ohio River by Athens. Marietta can be given to West Virginia. At least have one nice town(Athens) on the Ohio river lolBuild a wall along Washington and Athens Counties; and make Marietta pay for it!
Is that what she told Paul?My doctor told me that masks DO NOT stop infectious particles from entering one's body. That is what she told ol' Paul, too. Give gramps credit though, he followed through. Nice job, Paul. We now have quite a story to tell. You'll have to lie when telling it, but none-the-less.
Congrats. You’ve proven a point that has nothing to do with the topic.My doctor told me that masks DO NOT stop infectious particles from entering one's body. That is what she told ol' Paul, too. Give gramps credit though, he followed through. Nice job, Paul. We now have quite a story to tell. You'll have to lie when telling it, but none-the-less.
I still read this as the physicians recommendation. But, I’ll take your word for it. This is source is more timely than mine from July and I certainly believe the exempt conditions would be fluid as we learn more about the virus.
Stay with me. I'll do this one more time.Is that what she told Paul?
Not that unusual. Fans at youth sporting events aren’t always the best behaved.
The Logan Police Department issued a press release that states...
"Officer Smith was walking in the stadium and observed a female sitting in the stands without a mask, he approached the female and advised her she needed to put her mask on as required by the school policy. The female advised that she had asthma and was not going to put it on. Officer Smith advised the female several times that she needed to put her mask on, and that if she did not, she would be asked to leave and would have wait outside the stadium. The female continually refused his request and Officer Smith advised her that if she refused to leave, she would be cited for trespassing and escorted off the property."
The bolded part, if the asthma claim isIf she “truly had asthma” she wouldn’t have walked the distance of the parking lot to the stands wearing a mask in the first place.
This...100%. That's why I'm skeptical. If she had asthma, she should have been firm in her convictions and showed up at the game without a mask and declared she was exempt. But she didn't because she knew she wouldn't otherwise be able to buy a ticket. To do this I see as disingenuous.
Homework and credible sources go a long way for me. It’s like sweet whispers in my ear lolNo, you're not allowed to calmly agree with me based on reading an article or move on. we have to have different opinions that we're entrenched on and begin calling each other names and continuing to escalate this and never drop it until one of us dies. That's how yappi/internet arguments work.
If I’m the superintendent or a board member I don’t care about the ‘certain demographics’ you speak of. I care about my staff handling this in a way that doesn’t escalate it to the crapshow it’s become. The lady appears to have been in the wrong, but it likely could have been handled better.Maybe. I think that's true of a lot of police interactions with citizens though. But this is the one time certain demographics have their panties in a bunch when somebody gets arrested for not complying with police orders. Otherwise, their default position is just "comply with police and you have nothing to worry about."
Ive been dabbling on the Debate forum with this crowd......they say crazy stuff, then declare victory. Which is why I’ve just taken to slinging and insults over there because it’s more fun. They don’t care about being credible.Says who? You’ve been proven to be not a credible source by many on here.
You're moving the goalposts. At first it was masks aren't effective. Then it was masks aren't effective in preventing infectious disease from entering your body. Now it's "masks won't totally prevent the wearer from contracting COVID."Stay with me. I'll do this one more time.
My doctor told me that masks do not prevent infectious particles from entering one's body.
Whomever Paul talked to said (based on Paul's post) "the mask won’t totally prevent the wearer from contracting Covid".
We good here? I'm not sure how else I could break it down for you.
Your point doesn’t stand. Thanks for the credit, but it wasn’t that hard. What’s more disturbing is that you sent me a phone number, which a quick google search provided the name and address of your doctor. Also, it gave me a rough idea of the area in which you live. Following that, you offered someone else your GI doc's info. It wouldn’t take much for some lunatic to find you. Fortunately for you, I’m not a lunatic. You should be more careful on the internet my friend.Paul, I was there, you were not. My point stands. I will give you credit for making the call, no matter how pathetic it appears.
First, that’s not exactly what her office said. She said it helps. Secondly, this wasn’t your original argument. Try to keep up.Stay with me. I'll do this one more time.
My doctor told me that masks do not prevent infectious particles from entering one's body.
Whomever Paul talked to said (based on Paul's post) "the mask won’t totally prevent the wearer from contracting Covid".
We good here? I'm not sure how else I could break it down for you.
Paul, I am not hiding from anyone, including "lunatics". Moreover, Paul, and really, the more disturbing point here is that you called my doctor. You, a stranger, called my doctor. Think about that. You took the time to call my primary care doctor in order to try and win an internet squabble. SMH. I think it's fair to say that you need a hobby, old friend.Your point doesn’t stand. Thanks for the credit, but it wasn’t that hard. What’s more disturbing is that you sent me a phone number, which a quick google search provided the name and address of your doctor. Also, it gave me a rough idea of the area in which you live. Following that, you offered someone else your GI doc's info. It wouldn’t take much for some lunatic to find you. Fortunately for you, I’m not a lunatic. You should be more careful on the internet my friend.
My doctor told me that masks DO NOT stop infectious particles from entering one's body. That is what she told ol' Paul, too. Give gramps credit though, he followed through. Nice job, Paul. We now have quite a story to tell. You'll have to lie when telling it, but none-the-less.
No one complains about their freedom, until it is too late.Might have been talking about cheap cotton ones. N95's certainly do. They've been around for decades and that's what they're for. We have been wearing them in our shop forever and nobody ever complained about their freedom.