Have there been any updates on this situation?
In the article from DyeStat that Runohio posted in the post immediately preceding this one, Clayton Murphy alluded to the fact that this actually may be a Title IX issue:
"The men's cross country team has a high graduation rate and nearly every member pays four years of in-state tuition to the university. Financially, Murphy said, it doesn't make sense. Cutting cross country doesn't make a dent in what the school's administrators said they must trim.
But in the phone call with the athletic director, a new reason was offered for cutting the program, or at least not reinstating it through a fund-raising drive: Title IX.
"That was frustrating," Murphy said. "It started off as COVID-19 related budget cuts, and now (the administration) is hiding behind the Title IX issue."
Murphy has future meetings scheduled with former teammates, and a former compliance officer at another university, to weigh the merits of the Title IX claim.
"It's tough to argue against that one without knowing more of the facts," Murphy said. "It's a murky issue."
I mentioned Title IX in a post earlier in this thread:
In reviewing the budget I am wondering what the athletic department thought was the first program that should be cut? If it was women's tennis, did UA need to cut 2 men's teams in order to keep the balance that Title IX requires? If it is decided that XC would be reinstated would another men's team be on the chopping block in order to stay in compliance? I admittedly do not know a lot about Title IX requirements. If the XC program could figure out a way to be self-funding would it then count in the Title IX numbers?
SOTT seems to have some insider knowledge and stated that it was not believed that Title IX is an issue:
I have not seen the actual numbers myself, but I have been told by those who have run the numbers that adding men's cross country back would not take them out of Title IX compliance. For arguments sake let's say that adding cross country back would take them out of alignment by a little bit. Coach Mitchell, who has final control over all the rosters, could easily adjust here or there by trimming a few men and/or adding a few women to make them compliant. Having been the coach at Akron for 25 years, they should give him the opportunity to rectify a Title IX imbalance via roster moves if that truly is an issue.
I'm wondering what the reality is.
If this isn't a Title IX issue and is instead a funding issue, I find it curious that UA recently added women's lacrosse. Additionally, they play in the ASUN Conference for women's lacrosse. Geographically, that league will cause substantial travel requirements. The league is composed of Jacksonville University (Florida), Liberty (Lynchburg, VA), Kennesaw State (Georgia), Coastal Carolina (Conway, SC), Howard (DC), Stetson (DeLand, FL), Kent State, and Akron. That, to me at least, sounds expensive.
If a sport for women was added, it should have been field hockey, IMHO. Again, it is just my opinion, but field hockey is superior to women's lacrosse in every way. It's a much better sport - no offense to anyone here that is a women's lacrosse fan. I guess the overriding factor here may be the popularity of lacrosse. The sport has exploded in popularity while field hockey has waned somewhat. I digress, though, but the MAC does have women's field hockey. Regular MAC members Miami, Kent, Ohio, Ball State, and Central Michigan all have field hockey teams. Longwood University (Farmville, VA), and Appalachian State (Boone, NC), are affiliate members for field hockey. The travel requirements would be substantially less.
This whole situation seems "off" to me. Something just is not right. As others have stated, I do not believe that it is a budget issue. If what Clayton Murphy stated, that there were only $7900 of operating expenses for the 2019 season, it furthers the notion that it is not a budget issue. Many outside sources would fund that amount in a heartbeat. I have no ties to the program and would gladly donate that amount to keep the program alive. I'm sure that there are many others that would also.
More on this here from Clayton Murphy's Twitter account: