Ukraine Whistleblower

Happy -

Rule # 1 Never have someone Testify who knows more than you do ! Case in Point
Rudy Knows more ... so they Only want his Work Product - Giuliani subpoenaed for Documents

Why bother when this is clearly work product from Attorney- Client Privilege - FO He clearly has the Right to Refuse to Disclose

lawyer–client privilege is a "client's right to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications between the client and the attorney."
 
2manyBats said:
View attachment 3874
Click to expand...


Isn't that special.

We now have the evidence that Biden lied about whether he knew/discussed his son't business dealings with the corrupt Ukrainian gas company.

We also have the video evidence of Biden incriminating himself about his bribery of Ukrainian officials (with American taxpayer dollars) to halt an investigation into the corruption at the same Ukrainian gas company.


When will he be found guilty and sentenced to prison for selling the Vice-Presidency of the United States?

When will the left-wing media be held to account for covering up this criminal activity?
 
3879
 
2manyBats said:
Happy -

Rule # 1 Never have someone Testify who knows more than you do ! Case in Point
Rudy Knows more ... so they Only want his Work Product - Giuliani subpoenaed for Documents

Why bother when this is clearly work product from Attorney- Client Privilege - FO He clearly has the Right to Refuse to Disclose

lawyer–client privilege is a "client's right to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications between the client and the attorney."
Click to expand...
Why is the presidents personal lawyer working on behalf of his client in Ukraine? Why is the state department working with his private attorney.
 
Happygoluckky said:
Why is the presidents personal lawyer working on behalf of his client in Ukraine? Why is the state department working with his private attorney.
Click to expand...
Because he is a top prosecutor. He should, however, be given an official status. Maybe he already has it. Why do you suddenly not want to get the bottom of foreign collusion?
 
Happygoluckky said:
Why is the presidents personal lawyer working on behalf of his client in Ukraine? Why is the state department working with his private attorney.
Click to expand...

Because they are real Americans who want to get to the bottom of the corruption of the obama/biden/clinton regime.
 
Purplemojo said:
Because he is a top prosecutor. He should, however, be given an official status. Maybe he already has it. Why do you suddenly not want to get the bottom of foreign collusion?
Click to expand...
Was a prosecutor. He has been doing a little grifting himself. (swampy) To think that Trump has any interest in Ukrainian corruption is hilarious. Has he ever mentioned it? Tweeted about it? Ever? Ukraine was Pauly "walnuts" Mannaforts cash cow...and he is in the BIG house.
Qcity said:
Because they are real Americans who want to get to the bottom of the corruption of the obama/biden/clinton regime.
Click to expand...
Now that is hilarious.
 
Happygoluckky said:
Was a prosecutor. He has been doing a little grifting himself. (swampy) To think that Trump has any interest in Ukrainian corruption is hilarious. Has he ever mentioned it? Tweeted about it? Ever? Ukraine was Pauly "walnuts" Mannaforts cash cow...and he is in the BIG house.
Now that is hilarious.
Click to expand...


Does your weekly stipend come from a Ukrainian bank?
 
Happygoluckky said:
Why is the presidents personal lawyer working on behalf of his client in Ukraine? Why is the state department working with his private attorney.
Click to expand...
The president was proven by 4 seperate investigation to be wrongly accused of Russian collusion...he should get a bunch of lawyers to go after those responsible for lying about this... You might want to join the lawsuit, look at what they put you through for the last three years.
You should be more upset than anyone and could probably join the lawsuit due to constant fake news and propaganda affecting your mental health.
 
Happygoluckky said:
So hundreds of separate MSM entities with hundreds of reporters are all over the world are all in on this conspiracy? Hundreds of intelligence officers in multiple agencies (many appointed by republicans) are all willing to risk their careers.
Click to expand...

Thanks to Frank Church, a great patriot and democratic senator from Idaho who was willing to take on the deep state, we do know they had hundreds doing this from the 50's through the 70's....how many do they have now? Only a fool would say, they don't have any.


I suggest you brush up on your history and read or watch the Church commission hearings, they called it "Operation Mockingbird."
 
Interesting observation by Jason Chaffetz about how Trump's unprecedented transparency is blowing up the various democrat schemes to nail him:

www.foxnews.com

Jason Chaffetz: Trump's transparency is driving the left nuts (and messing up their impeachment dreams)

In 2016, Americans voted for a disruptive, unconventional president who would do things differently than they had ever been done before. That's exactly what they got. And the left can't handle it.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


He wasn't supposed to release the transcripts. Or the whistleblower report. He was expected to do what any president would have done – what President Obama always did. Hide the evidence.

As House Democrats rolled out their latest meticulously choreographed, perfectly timed, and broadly coordinated attack on President Trump, they weren't counting on the president's unprecedented transparency. Nobody releases a transcript of calls between heads of state.

But Donald Trump did. In the process, he screwed up the narrative. Again.

He's right and I'm surprised he did release this stuff without a fight. Yet by releasing the information he enabled all of us to make an INFORMED, ADULT decision as to whether or not he did what the democrats accuse him of doing.


Having been on the House Oversight Committee during the duration of the Obama presidency, I can attest that the administration fought every document request every time, releasing only the bare minimum. No excuse was too thin to withhold documents or testimony.

In contrast, President Trump did the unthinkable: he actually waived both executive privilege and attorney-client privilege for the Mueller investigation. What other president would allow his general counsel to be interviewed for more than 30 hours?

Donald Trump does. He should be winning awards for his openness and transparency. We've never seen anything like it before. And it's messing with the Democrats' narrative.

This is also spot on. Whether you love, hate or feel indifferent about Trump he is transparent. You know what he's thinking. I find that refreshing because again it allows me to make an informed decision as to his performance.
 
Latest update from Stupid Watergates....Thet package of whackadoo disinformation the State Department IG ran over to Congress...
...came from Roody Colloody.

Pence is distancing himself from Trump on Ukraine. Rush is turning on Fox News. Rudy is throwing the State Department under the bus. And Trump is lashing out in all directions at once. This kind of thing happens when a scandal begins to consume a presidency. It'll get worse.

Sad that prior to Trump national security was not something GOP senators would risk for their own political purpose...they are awefully quiet....Rob Portman???
 
Happygoluckky said:
Latest update from Stupid Watergates....Thet package of whackadoo disinformation the State Department IG ran over to Congress...
...came from Roody Colloody.

Pence is distancing himself from Trump on Ukraine. Rush is turning on Fox News. Rudy is throwing the State Department under the bus. And Trump is lashing out in all directions at once. This kind of thing happens when a scandal begins to consume a presidency. It'll get worse.

Sad that prior to Trump national security was not something GOP senators would risk for their own political purpose...they are awefully quiet....Rob Portman???
Click to expand...
Drip Drip Drip
 
It seems Pencil Neck Schiff is not an honest or good person and does not play well with others - Republicans for sure. Rules say when the head of a committee (Schiff) learns that a possible whislteblower seeks guidance from the committee staff before going to the Intelligence Community Inspector general this is to be shared with both sides R and D. Seems this was not done. Surprise!!!!! As much reading between the lines Schiff has done on the Trump phone conversation maybe I can say I think between the lines that Schiff's people helped write the complaint on it. I ask "How can we the American citizens trust this complaint any longer? Democrats, please quit wasting taxpayers money and time>
 
19AL63 said:
It seems Pencil Neck Schiff is not an honest or good person and does not play well with others - Republicans for sure. Rules say when the head of a committee (Schiff) learns that a possible whislteblower seeks guidance from the committee staff before going to the Intelligence Community Inspector general this is to be shared with both sides R and D. Seems this was not done. Surprise!!!!! As much reading between the lines Schiff has done on the Trump phone conversation maybe I can say I think between the lines that Schiff's people helped write the complaint on it. I ask "How can we the American citizens trust this complaint any longer? Democrats, please quit wasting taxpayers money and time>
Click to expand...
No he did not speak to the whistleblower. His staff directed the whistleblower to retain counsel and report to the IC IG which he did. The whistleblower had also reached out to the CIA AG who reported to the WH. When the IC IG demonstrated concern the WH/DOJ intervened and Barr despite being named directly in the complaint shut it down and prevented it from being shared with the Congressional IC. This is when Schiff went public and issued the subpoena.
 
Happygoluckky said:
No he did not speak to the whistleblower. His staff directed the whistleblower to retain counsel and report to the IC IG which he did. The whistleblower had also reached out to the CIA AG who reported to the WH. When the IC IG demonstrated concern the WH/DOJ intervened and Barr despite being named directly in the complaint shut it down and prevented it from being shared with the Congressional IC. This is when Schiff went public and issued the subpoena.
Click to expand...
Somebody should subpoena all of the Congressman's records from the beginning of time to verify this.
 
A newly unearthed letter from 2016 shows that Republican senators pushed for reforms to Ukraine's prosecutor general's office and judiciary, echoing calls then-Vice President Joe Biden made at the time.

www.cnn.com

Republican senators echoed Biden in urging Ukrainian president to reform prosecutor general's office

A newly unearthed letter from 2016 shows that Republican senators pushed for reforms to Ukraine's prosecutor general's office and judiciary, echoing calls then-Vice President Joe Biden made at the time.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
Happygoluckky said:
No he did not speak to the whistleblower. His staff directed the whistleblower to retain counsel and report to the IC IG which he did. The whistleblower had also reached out to the CIA AG who reported to the WH. When the IC IG demonstrated concern the WH/DOJ intervened and Barr despite being named directly in the complaint shut it down and prevented it from being shared with the Congressional IC. This is when Schiff went public and issued the subpoena.
Click to expand...


Happy Happy. You seemed to missed the whole point of my post or you do not want to face the truth. I do not know which. When the whistleblower came to Pencil Necks staff for guidance this should have been shared with the Republicans on the committee. Unless you think rules are only for some people and not others. You do realize this is the reason Nancy could announce impeachment inquiry before the whisleblower's complaint was made public. Pencil Neck knew, ( he did not need to speak to the guy, his staff did and you want me to believe his staff did not tell him and get told what and how to handle this.)Nancy knew, but the Republicans on the committee did not know and that is just wrong and makes this just another witch hunt to get Trump anyway possible. even if it is not playing by the rules.
 
Since the below was Hidden for Years..... Is it Likely that HildaBeast Or Quid pro Joe See Justice ?

When sexual harassers agree on confidential settlements with victims, at least the payments come out of the harassers' own pockets or from companies that choose to employ them.

But not, as the nation has learned this month, when the harasser serves in Congress. Then, taxpayers foot the bill. And the entire episode remains hidden.

www.cnn.com

Explaining the $17M Congress paid in settlements

Two things have become painfully clear on Capitol Hill this week: Lawmakers and staffers say sexual harassment is "rampant" -- but even members of Congress have no idea just how widespread the problem is.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com

Congress paid out $17 million in settlements.

www.usatoday.com

Sexual harassment fund exposes Congress

Under Congressional Accountability Act, taxpayers pay for secret settlements. \nWhere's the accountability?: Our view
www.usatoday.com www.usatoday.com
 
Happygoluckky said:
No he did not speak to the whistleblower. His staff directed the whistleblower to retain counsel and report to the IC IG which he did. The whistleblower had also reached out to the CIA AG who reported to the WH. When the IC IG demonstrated concern the WH/DOJ intervened and Barr despite being named directly in the complaint shut it down and prevented it from being shared with the Congressional IC. This is when Schiff went public and issued the subpoena.
Click to expand...


Schiff's staff is obviously an extension of him. Do you imagine that Mr W. Blower got out the Yellow Pages and looked for a lawyer ? ?

Of course Barr stepped on the complaint. It is unsubstantiated heresay. Now we know it is also colored by Schiff's influence before it's final draft, and we all watched him so FOOLishly embellish it even publically - in his position of Intelligence Committee Chair, no less.

This is a farce, and your little spin of it is really cute. Nice try, but, no. This is another Dem fail.
 
Happygoluckky said:
A newly unearthed letter from 2016 shows that Republican senators pushed for reforms to Ukraine's prosecutor general's office and judiciary, echoing calls then-Vice President Joe Biden made at the time.

www.cnn.com

Republican senators echoed Biden in urging Ukrainian president to reform prosecutor general's office

A newly unearthed letter from 2016 shows that Republican senators pushed for reforms to Ukraine's prosecutor general's office and judiciary, echoing calls then-Vice President Joe Biden made at the time.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...

How many of them were protecting their son's income stream ?
 
lotr10 said:
Interesting observation by Jason Chaffetz about how Trump's unprecedented transparency is blowing up the various democrat schemes to nail him:

www.foxnews.com

Jason Chaffetz: Trump's transparency is driving the left nuts (and messing up their impeachment dreams)

In 2016, Americans voted for a disruptive, unconventional president who would do things differently than they had ever been done before. That's exactly what they got. And the left can't handle it.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com


He wasn't supposed to release the transcripts. Or the whistleblower report. He was expected to do what any president would have done – what President Obama always did. Hide the evidence.

As House Democrats rolled out their latest meticulously choreographed, perfectly timed, and broadly coordinated attack on President Trump, they weren't counting on the president's unprecedented transparency. Nobody releases a transcript of calls between heads of state.

But Donald Trump did. In the process, he screwed up the narrative. Again.

He's right and I'm surprised he did release this stuff without a fight. Yet by releasing the information he enabled all of us to make an INFORMED, ADULT decision as to whether or not he did what the democrats accuse him of doing.


Having been on the House Oversight Committee during the duration of the Obama presidency, I can attest that the administration fought every document request every time, releasing only the bare minimum. No excuse was too thin to withhold documents or testimony.

In contrast, President Trump did the unthinkable: he actually waived both executive privilege and attorney-client privilege for the Mueller investigation. What other president would allow his general counsel to be interviewed for more than 30 hours?

Donald Trump does. He should be winning awards for his openness and transparency. We've never seen anything like it before. And it's messing with the Democrats' narrative.

This is also spot on. Whether you love, hate or feel indifferent about Trump he is transparent. You know what he's thinking. I find that refreshing because again it allows me to make an informed decision as to his performance.
Click to expand...

Shine a light, and merely being a bit of a boorish lout looks pretty good by comparison. Go, Orange Man!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top