1) I didn't see Gordie Howe, but I believe all of the reports that he was a helluva player.
2) And there were many, many reports in NE Ohio about the discrepancy in ice time the various kids had.
3) Oh, and the coaches did NOT make this decision.
4) Well, unless you think Iggy's coach was lying on local Cleveland radio yesterday morning. If that was his decision why were his kids on the ice ready to go?
1) Which has what to do with your knowledge of the players and the coaches' decisions? I'm sure you think there's logic or reasoning in your statement but it's really just noise. Are you saying there's credible reports that there's been some lying going on? Link them.
2) I won't doubt you but that has what to do with the decision made? The coaches would know this and apparently it was considered and not pertinent or not true.
3)
The shared title was agreed upon mutually by the head coaches, school administrators and Ohio High School Athletic Association administrators, the OHSAA said in a statement Saturday.
After the seventh overtime, the head coaches, school athletic administrators and OHSAA administrators had a lengthy discussion. Many players on both teams were seriously fatigued and neither coach or school administrator objected to ending the game before the eighth overtime began.
Pretty clearly stated, the coaches made the decision as part of the whole.
4) As for his "lying," I already posted on this. If this all happened before he had his kids take the ice then I'd SPECULATE that he was show boating and also being disingenuous the next day. If the decision came after he had his kids take the ice then as I and KBaller posted, I'd say that someone brought to his attention some things he had not considered and he then came to a different conclusion about whether or not to continue.
It's not clear when this "lengthy" discussion took place and nature abhores a vacuum, doesn't it? "before the eighth overtime began" is so vague. Before the originally scheduled 8th or are they simply saying the 8th didn't occur because of the decision? If there was lying going on or unclear timeline, you can't keep that stuff secret long but Id presume CatAlum's post sums up correctly the events as they occurred.
Unless OHSAA flat out lied, something neither that coach nor his administrators have claimed, there doesn't seem to be anything else to debate regards his not objecting to and his accepting the decision?
The St. I coach made NO demonstration after the decision was announced. By all accounts as well his personal actions, he was part of the decision making process, agreed with the end result and life goes on. I see no reason to think his statements the next day are saying he didn't agree with the decision. :shrug:
You seem to have a conspiracy floating in your head. Instead of being vague why don't you be upfront and say what it is.