Is that "unofficially " official? Or at least as official can be?The goal is to decrease the overall enrollment disparity within divisions. It’ll break down like this- d1, 64 schools. D2, 64 schools. D3-7, an even split of the remaining schools.
Is that "unofficially " official? Or at least as official can be?The goal is to decrease the overall enrollment disparity within divisions. It’ll break down like this- d1, 64 schools. D2, 64 schools. D3-7, an even split of the remaining schools.
I wasn't clear in my post, didn't mean it to be informational. It saddens me that the district tournament would be watered down.I’m aware.
Given that it hasn’t been board approved yet, I’d say it’s still firmly “unofficial” but that’s the current plan under consideration.Is that "unofficially " official? Or at least as official can be?
You’re good. Trust me, the concept of powers of 2 and how they relate to tournament staging can be fun to deep-dive.I wasn't clear in my post, didn't mean it to be informational. It saddens me that the district tournament would be watered down.
A small number may have interest for a challenge but that were the case for everyone you would have have a D4 school loaded with D1 talent. Do you really think SVSM would rather have 7 runner-up D1 trophies in their case or 7 D2 champion trophies?I just think they would move up.
It depends. I think they would like to compete in D1. I really do. Especially if you allow the choice it would be a bad look to not go up. Some wouldn’t care but I believe most that have a legit chance would do it.A small number may have interest for a challenge but that were the case for everyone you would have have a D4 school loaded with D1 talent. Do you really think SVSM would rather have 7 runner-up D1 trophies in their case or 7 D2 champion trophies?
Could be a lot more like the current volleyball system where high schools handle events until state level. No need for BG, OU, UT anymore.It wouldn’t be more tournament games. It’s the same number of tournament games. It will probably lose money, unless state title attendance greatly increases, as now they have to rent the biggest venues for more games.
I think they would schedule those teams in regular season. If the high number of players that transferred to RH wanted to play big school talent they would not have gone to a D4 school. IMOIt depends. I think they would like to compete in D1. I really do. Especially if you allow the choice it would be a bad look to not go up. Some wouldn’t care but I believe most that have a legit chance would do it.
I don’t think kids are thinking that way to be honest. But maybe they areI think they would schedule those teams in regular season. If the high number of players that transferred to RH wanted to play big school talent they would not have gone to a D4 school. IMO
So now you don't think kids and their parents are making these moves to win?I don’t think kids are thinking that way to be honest. But maybe they are
To win is part of the larger pie. What division in the state of Ohio I don’t think matters as much. But still a slice of the pie. More about playing with other good players. Recruiting exposure for some of the pie. Richmond Heights playing some high level national teams.So now you don't think kids and their parents are making these moves to win?
RH is playing high level teams now that they have won back to back state titles with ease. A group of kids and their parents selected a small D4 public school on the east side of Cleveland for a reason.To win is part of the larger pie. What division in the state of Ohio I don’t think matters as much. But still a slice of the pie. More about playing with other good players. Recruiting exposure for some of the pie. Richmond Heights playing some high level national teams.
I just think there are multiple slices to the pie than just winning a D4 state championship.
When it comes right down to it for basketball, it doesn't matter much if you have 1200 boys in your school or 700.Make division 1 in basketball the same as football, then divide everyone else into four divisions for five total.
And I am saying there are multiple reasons for that and winning a D4 state championship might not be the biggest slice. I don’t think that is too crazy to say.RH is playing high level teams now that they have won back to back state titles with ease. A group of kids and their parents selected a small D4 public school on the east side of Cleveland for a reason.
When it comes right down to it for basketball, it doesn't matter much if you have 1200 boys in your school or 700.
Richmond Hgts has 98.
I don't think anything is crazy to say. Believing it may be something else.And I am saying there are multiple reasons for that and winning a D4 state championship might not be the biggest slice. I don’t think that is too crazy to say.
Football and basketball are apples and oranges. One great player can carry a basketball team to a District Championship. One great player can help a football team be better.People say this but other than the exception of those "super teams," what data do you have to support this? In Southwest Ohio, there are more D2 football-sized schools in Division 1 basketball than D1 football-sized schools. Yet something like 41 of the last 44 district champions are D1 football-sized schools. If the enrollment imbalance doesn't matter much, why the imbalance in results?
So under this plan, the team that won D1 a year ago (Archbishop Hoban) would drop to D3. I get enrollment disparity with football, but still don't comprehend it entirely with basketball.The goal is to decrease the overall enrollment disparity within divisions. It’ll break down like this- d1, 64 schools. D2, 64 schools. D3-7, an even split of the remaining schools.
So why doesn't it happen more? I gave data. You are speaking in generalities. If enrollment doesn't matter much, why such dominance by the larger D1 schools over the smaller ones? Do you have data from other parts of the state that differs from what we are seeing in Southwest Ohio?Football and basketball are apples and oranges. One great player can carry a basketball team to a District Championship. One great player can help a football team be better.
There are definitely multiple slicesand every time these type of programs get brought and get accused of stealing small town championships it shows who the people who dont get it truly are but I digress lolTo win is part of the larger pie. What division in the state of Ohio I don’t think matters as much. But still a slice of the pie. More about playing with other good players. Recruiting exposure for some of the pie. Richmond Heights playing some high level national teams.
I just think there are multiple slices to the pie than just winning a D4 state championship.
Agreed. The best way to figure out how many games there will be is to take the total number of teams and subtract the number of state champions. That is the total number of tournament games (everyone loses once except the champs). Every additional division means one less game in the total number of tournament games.It wouldn’t be more tournament games.
I think the big variable becomes if Divisions III-VII would continue to adhere to the sixteen district tournaments format across the six geographic districts, or not. Evidently that’s going away with Divisions I and II being four regions of 16.Agreed. The best way to figure out how many games there will be is to take the total number of teams and subtract the number of state champions. That is the total number of tournament games (everyone loses once except the champs). Every additional division means one less game in the total number of tournament games.