ShootNation
Well-known member
If you can't grasp the differences at play between how someone personally dresses themselves and someone dressing up as someone else in a Halloween costume fashion there's no conversation to be had. So rather than fill the thread up with more soapbox speeches and rebuttals, how about you think hard about your beloved Indians nickname and what traditions and history your district has that are intrinsically linked to that name with the exception of the fact that it has always been the nickname and list them out. Once you've completed that list, and I imagine it will be an incredibly short one, ask yourself if your connection to the name is because of your love of all the tradition and history connected to it or if something else is at play here. You don't have to post about it or reply to this, but just think about it deeply over the next few daysThis is the hypocrisy I was talking about. You don't get to decide what offends me. Just like I don't get to tell you it's not ok to be offended by the Indian nickname of mascot. We all have the same rights and protections. So why is it offensive to you, but "uncomfortable" to me? I have every right to be offended as you or anyone else does.....
Which leads me back to another previous point.....where do we draw the line? There is no agreeable point or way to determine what might be offensive to some.......let's get a PETA representative in here.....they'll probably be offended at animal nicknames....
We all have choice....and can choose not to attend school or events if we don't agree with a name or mascot. We live in a country where the most important job in the world is done by vote, which is usually determined by a majority rules vote. We are making major changes in this country, for very small amounts of voices/people/opinions.....it has to stop.