RedRider1
Well-known member
I think schools should have something in their back pockets in terms of alternate nicknames case it becomes a hot button issue in the community. Perhaps like the Indians did with deemphasizing Chief Wahoo slowly over a few years. But high schools don't have the marketing budgets of professional sports teams.I see Northwest LSD was in the Canton Suppository today......some people questioning why Northwest and other schools haven't moved away from the Mascot/Nicknames....specifically mentioned Copley, Northwest, Rittman, Chippewa. Referenced Cuyahoga Hts change from Redskins to Red Wolves and Walsh Jesuits change from an Indian "Warrior" to a more Crusader looking "Warrior"...
What is everyone's thoughts on this?? I just feel that everyone ultimately decides where they want to live, and what school they want their kids to attend. If you don't agree or find a school's nickname offensive, don't send your kids there. When I walk down the beer isle at my local grocery store, I choose not to drink Anheuser Busch products....I'm not asking Anheuser Busch to change their name, or their marketing....I'm just choosing not to buy it. Is it not the same concept?
Personally loved the Super's response to it....basically, no one in the community is complaining about the name, so we're not even looking at changing it....
Not cheap for a full rebrand (envelopes, letterhead, signage, uniforms, gym floor, etc) so I think a big piece of this is cost. And most schools don't have a marketing/PR person in charge of logo use across all sports teams at the school so it's would be a huge pain for a committee of people to get this done.
Just don't change your nickname to the Raptors like Cincinnati Anderson did a few years ago.