Where did I say the SEC didn't have the best bowl record? Can you quote it for me? I said they have had plenty of bowl seasons with .500 or less records, whatever else you read into is just you arguing with yourself.
So a 7-5 or 6-4 bowl record is "pretty dominant" but I'm the one hedging by saying .500 or less?
Penn st is marching down the field now
Were you not the one who said this:
I was just showing you that the numbers say otherwise, especially over the next 10 years. They win almost 2/3 of their bowl games, including the National Championship 7 out of 10 years. The next closest is the ACC at just over 50%, with two National Championships.
3 and 10 and running for the 1st down. Wow. This game is over
I said the SEC has had years they have struggled in bowls just like everyone else. Apparently I was hedging by calling .500 record struggling, but in the same vein 6-4 and 7-5 was not hedging to be called dominant.
Shouldn't have gone for the FG. Let McSorley determine the outcome
You're getting here. Just take the L.