CMH FB
Well-known member
This is arguably the most incorrect comment I have ever seen and hope people don’t really believe this.There is a direct correlation between enrollment and available athletes. The larger your enrollment the more athletes in that pool of kids. I would suggest to you that for every 50 boys you have in enrollment you will have 5-6 really good athletes and another 5-6 role players.
What plays a larger role in this is how many sports you offer. The more sports the more you waterdown your talent base.
What’s your explanation for City League schools, Appalachian Schools?
Why is Scioto and Kilbourne nowhere near as competitive as say Upper Arlington or the Olentangys?
Come on.