Not being from Central Ohio, I’ve never understood the OCC, can’t keep up with who plays who and why, don’t understand why schools from the same city don’t play and basically why any school would want to be in a 30 school league.
The LCL addition of Mount Vernon next year is going to make travel a little more difficult. Right now, in the Buckeye Licking Valley will be competing against three D2 schools and two D3 schools on a regular basis as a D4 school. It will be interesting to see if they choose to pivot in the future. As far as future additions go, I dont see New Albany wanting in, but I would like to see these 3 schools join...Newark, Tri Valley, & Sheridan. I know basketball is essentially why Newark is in the OCC, but they belong in the LCL.LCL is going to be a hot bed for population growth in the next 10 years, will be interesting to see how that plays out. Don’t think they would accept them but New Albany should leave at the opportunity if it happens.
Hey, longtime yappster, first time football poster...saw this thread, read some replies and wanted to add to the conversation...Not being from Central Ohio, I’ve never understood the OCC, can’t keep up with who plays who and why, don’t understand why schools from the same city don’t play and basically why any school would want to be in a 30 school league.
Outstanding! How did we end up with today's disaster?like the league but to survive they need to realign geographically and competitively, and keeping most inter-district schools in the same division. something like this:
Big School West:
Jerome
Coffman
Marysville
Bradley
Davidson
Darby
Big School Central:
Thomas Worthington
Upper Arlington
Olentangy
Liberty
Berlin
Orange
Big School East:
Westerville Central
New Albany
Gahanna Lincoln
Reynoldsburg
Pick Central
Pick North
Small School North:
Scioto
Kilbourne
Delaware Hayes
Big Walnut
Westerville North
Westerville South
Newark
Small School South:
Logan
Teays Valley
Lancaster
Canal Winchester
Groveport
Grove City
Central Cross
That drive from Scioto to Kilbourne is a nightmare…The OCC has transportation nightmares.? Now that’s Funny.
Give me a Break.
great question! but as always no one goes with the logical answer..Outstanding! How did we end up with today's disaster?
That’s a Hard Rd to Drive.That drive from Scioto to Kilbourne is a nightmare…
The reason Logan is in is they applied to the MVL , LCL and Msl and didnt get in. This was their only choice. Next year they join newark, lancaster, teays valley, pick centralI'll still never understand the Logan addition. They will be what, slightly better than Franklin Heights? They can't handle the competition they are playing in football now (and it's not great by any means)- what happens when Pick Central comes to town?
Has the Licking County League considered changing their name since they are continuing to expand their footprint, or is it a brand name like the Big Ten???The reason Logan is in is they applied to the MVL , LCL and Msl and didnt get in. This was their only choice. Next year they join newark, lancaster, teays valley, pick central
Reynoldsburg, Canal , groveport.
Mount Vernon will join the LCL big division (buckeye) in 2024. That makes 12 teams 6 per division
Call it the Tri County League...?Has the Licking County League considered changing their name since they are continuing to expand their footprint, or is it a brand name like the Big Ten???
Big Walnut and Buckeye Valley are blowing up, so it’s possible. Newark will head south soon.
Olentangy Five will do their own thing by the end of the decade. It makes too much sense financially and for the greater good of tradition.
i like where your head is at with this in terms of keeping schools in the same district in the same divisions. i think the OCC is a good league and there is a way to make it succeed. here is what i proposed:Apologies for bumping this thread, but wanted to add that I agree with the OP. In my opinion, the OCC could be split up into several smaller, regional leagues that'd benefit the student athletes, families and fans, and the school districts as a whole. For starters, take a look at the northside. You could create a 14-school conference centered around the Dublin, Olentangy, Westerville, and Worthington districts. New Albany and Upper Arlington could round it out to create two 7-school divisions, north and south, of schools who see each other as cultural and institutional peers:
North Division
Berlin
Central
Liberty
North
Olentangy
Orange
South
South Division
Coffman
Jerome
Kilbourne
New Albany
Scioto
Thomas Worthington
Upper Arlington
Each school could play six divisional games and then a seventh 'north vs south' interdivisional game at the end of the regular season based off W/L standings, with the top teams from each division competing for the conference championship. Additionally, this realignment would solve several issues highlighted in the thread:
- All schools from the same district would belong to the same division, decreasing travel time and strengthening local rivalries
- Although divisions would be based off geography, not enrollment, the north and south would be balanced in regards to D1/D2 schools (5-6 D1 schools, 1-2 D2 schools); less reshuffling means the divisions would become recognizable with time
- The longest distance between two schools in either division would be 30 mins, with the average traveling distance hovering around 17 mins
Power in numbers. You get 34 schools whipped into agreeing to pay 15-20% more the going rate, per game, for what other leagues are paying the refs and the result is more security in getting refs to stick with you. The OCC has a very strong reputation in officiating circles compared to other area leagues.I’m still waiting for reasons, anyone, to explain the purpose of being in the OCC other than to help for scheduling. No one ever seems to have an answer.
I doubt anyone cares about Westland leaving, much like Franklin Heights’ departure. For the longest time Westland was bundled with the likes of Coffman, Davidson and UA. They were nary the least bit competitive, and it was a widely held opinion then that they needed a new division of the OCC that met their competitive needs better — or leave.Westland will leave next and expect CC to follow suit. Dominoes will continue to fall. The issue is there is a massive disparity in enrollment and demographics continuing to grow. Some schools are treated like it’s the 90s still and expected to compete with programs that have 5-6x the amount of athletes…some of the expectations lies in their own school district. It’s a mess.
Gahanna is the biggest school in the OCC with 2300 students and Big Walnut is the smallest with 1300. Where do you get 5-6x times the athletes from. Maybe 2x but not 5-6x.I don’t think people understand. The OCC doesn’t need realignment, once Olentangy realizes the league needs them more than they need the OCC, they’re gone and it will be as soon as #5 is built. However that’s another 6-7 years away.
Westland will leave next and expect CC to follow suit. Dominoes will continue to fall. The issue is there is a massive disparity in enrollment and demographics continuing to grow. Some schools are treated like it’s the 90s still and expected to compete with programs that have 5-6x the amount of athletes…some of the expectations lies in their own school district. It’s a mess.
So I call you out for false claims and you are too tired. LolGahanna has an enrollment of about 700 more kids than Westerville Central who’s in their OCC. There is no need for them to be in same conference, it shows in all sports.
To ask a very simple question again. Why do all of these schools feel the need to be in the OCC? What’s the benefit other than scheduling?
Too tired for this conversation anymore. Look forward to Friday. See you later!
Westland should have been a package deal with Franklin Heights a few months ago. I don't know what the district was thinking.I doubt anyone cares about Westland leaving, much like Franklin Heights’ departure. For the longest time Westland was bundled with the likes of Coffman, Davidson and UA. They were nary the least bit competitive, and it was a widely held opinion then that they needed a new division of the OCC that met their competitive needs better — or leave.
Might be a stretch to accuse SWCS of thinking during the last 15 years as it relates to OCC participation for those two schools.Westland should have been a package deal with Franklin Heights a few months ago. I don't know what the district was thinking.
Was it the district that kept WL in? Or did the new conference not want to admit a school that large? WL is listed @ 1,800 students on the OCC Wiki. FH is listed at 1,300 (which sounds high to me).Westland should have been a package deal with Franklin Heights a few months ago. I don't know what the district was thinking.
The league in question also didn’t want to play a school with less than 300 students in it, so a) who knows what they want (although it’s an open secret what they would like) and b) who cares what they want?Was it the district that kept WL in? Or did the new conference not want to admit a school that large? WL is listed @ 1,800 students on the OCC Wiki. FH is listed at 1,300 (which sounds high to me).
I could see conferences not wanting to admit a school like WL based on their size.
No.I guess that's another question for this thread.. is there an option out there for all these 1,500 plus enrollment schools other than the OCC?
You’re not wrong. But, like, in the case of Franklin Heights and Westland, they’re both just destined to be uncompetitive and their difficulties extend beyond conference. I’m not sure Franklin Heights gets fixed playing Bexley (even though their football is not good), Buckeye Valley (yeah let’s see how long this CBL concept lives with them), Cols Academy, or Whitehall (the only school they’re going have a common denominator with — even though Whitehall does more and has more organization.) Playing Ready is going to be a kick in the testicles on the regular for Heights.A major issue that seems to be a common theme in this thread is the concept that more enrollment means more athletes, which is absolutely not the case for 50% of the schools.
A major issue that seems to be a common theme in this thread is the concept that more enrollment means more athletes, which is absolutely not the case for 50% of the schools.