Crimsonblooded
Well-known member
As far dividing the three DivisionsAbsolutely ?
As far dividing the three DivisionsAbsolutely ?
You have yet to acknowledge multiple coaches from multiple schools who’ve coached in multiple school divisions telling you how naive and incorrect your little assumption that “school size doesn’t matter in individual sport’s”.. Your entire argument is based off incorrect and naive viewsYou missed the whole point.
64 State Qualifiers instead of 48.
This creates a Higher possibility of making it to State.
You have yet to acknowledge multiple coaches from multiple schools who’ve coached in multiple school divisions telling you how naive and incorrect your little assumption that “school size doesn’t matter in individual sport’s”.. Your entire argument is based off incorrect and naive views
I hear ya. A man's opinion is his. To be fair though, many dumb people probably agree too? Right?My opinion is not naive or incorrect. It is my opinion.
I stand by my opinion and many intelligent people agree.
I have addressed this on the other thread. It’s about depth and quality of competition.. no one is saying they don’t work hard..My opinion is not naive or incorrect. It is my opinion.
D3 Dillon Campbell
D3 Max Shore
D3 Gavin Brown
D3 Logan Steiber
D3 Nathan Tomasello
And more
Can beat anyone at a bigger school.
They do not/did not care how small their school is.
They work just as hard, find outside opportunities, travel, have great coaches, lots of support, and are determined to win.
So I am entitled to my opinion and I stand by it.
Let me Repeat:
In My Humble Opinion:
In an Individual Sport and/or Individual Tournament (not team Duals)
The size of your school does not make you better.
It is man vs man on the mat.
The advantage goes to the one who worked the hardest.
if you can’t handle someone’s opinion and you think only you are right, then you shouldn’t be in an open discussion chat room.
I stand by my opinion and many intelligent people agree.
.. thekid who technically “worked less hard” wins more often than not..
Oh look at you. Ignoring most of it to focus on the thing that made you emotional.One of the dumbest things I ever heard on Yappi, or maybe the dumbest in my life, was this quote from Ugly Jack above.
Ugly Jack says "the kid who technically worked less hard wins more often than not"
So all you kids out there, listen to Uncle Ugly Jack. Don't work hard, just transfer to a bigger school, and you will win more often than not.
Cvca d2. Are you trying to get your kid to state???? And that's 5 guy's out of 500 great ones so what's your point. Opportunities equals development and recruitment. Look at us to California in the ncaa.My opinion is not naive or incorrect. It is my opinion.
D3 Dillon Campbell
D3 Max Shore
D3 Gavin Brown
D3 Logan Steiber
D3 Nathan Tomasello
And more
Can beat anyone at a bigger school.
They do not/did not care how small their school is.
They work just as hard, find outside opportunities, travel, have great coaches, lots of support, and are determined to win.
So I am entitled to my opinion and I stand by it.
Let me Repeat:
In My Humble Opinion:
In an Individual Sport and/or Individual Tournament (not team Duals)
The size of your school does not make you better.
It is man vs man on the mat.
The advantage goes to the one who worked the hardest.
if you can’t handle someone’s opinion and you think only you are right, then you shouldn’t be in an open discussion chat room.
I stand by my opinion and many intelligent people agree.
One of the dumbest things I ever heard on Yappi, or maybe the dumbest in my life, was this quote from Ugly Jack above.
Ugly Jack says "the kid who technically worked less hard wins more often than not"
So all you kids out there, listen to Uncle Ugly Jack. Don't work hard, just transfer to a bigger school, and you will win more often than not.
D3 Nathan Tomasello
CVCA was D3 just double checked on baumspageTomasello went to CVCA which is, and was, D2.
Tomasello won it twice in D3 and twice in D2.Tomasello went to CVCA which is, and was, D2.
He was D3 at least his freshmen year....Tomasello went to CVCA which is, and was, D2.
I don’t think so, maybe earlier but they were D2 when Nathan was thereCVCA was D3 just double checked on baumspage
2011 he was the D3 103 champI don’t think so, maybe earlier but they were D2 when Nathan was there
“Braden Brown and Bryce Maynard and more. Both can defeat D2 and D1 State placers.”Dear Cruiser_96
you are just repeating your rant from above. You already called me out for finding Middle-Ground like all smart negotiators do.
Stubborn people stick to their beliefs and don’t listen to others or engage in ongoing dialogue.
To Clarify my stance:
Model One:
I prefer 32 or 64 at State with One Division.
Model Two:
I would be ok with 32 at State with Two Divisions. More people prefer that scenario and it is more similar to the Greatest wrestling state of PA.
several people, including you Cruiser, would wish for some dream matchups between divisions. Combining divisions would allow for that.
A lot of people chimed in on the thread “regardless of division”.
Both models would allow for 64 State Qualifiers compared to the current 48.
This fixes several problems:
This opens up opportunities for kids at smaller schools to be seen and recognized.
it fixes the true 4th issue at District.
it fixes the weak Sectional problem.
It puts kids at an equal eye level for college coaches.
It creates dream matchups.
64 qualifiers means less quality kids get slighted
64 qualifiers means more have a chance
64 qualifiers gives more kids hope of making it to State
Currently only 16 in a State Bracket is a small elite group. 5th and 6th place kids in some divisions could be better than 4th in another. This year examples: Braden Brown and Bryce Maynard and more. Both can defeat D2 and D1 State placers.
so there are a lot of advantages to either model.
Be open minded and don’t slam my opinion. This is a sports discussion group.
which Model do you all prefer?
Model One?
Or
Model Two?
My opinion is not naive or incorrect. It is my opinion.
D3 Dillon Campbell
D3 Max Shore
D3 Gavin Brown
D3 Logan Steiber
D3 Nathan Tomasello
And more
Can beat anyone at a bigger school.
They do not/did not care how small their school is.
They work just as hard, find outside opportunities, travel, have great coaches, lots of support, and are determined to win.
So I am entitled to my opinion and I stand by it.
Let me Repeat:
In My Humble Opinion:
In an Individual Sport and/or Individual Tournament (not team Duals)
The size of your school does not make you better.
It is man vs man on the mat.
The advantage goes to the one who worked the hardest.
if you can’t handle someone’s opinion and you think only you are right, then you shouldn’t be in an open discussion chat room.
I stand by my opinion and many intelligent people agree.
I agree but also, D1 schools also may have more resources. Not every big school but especially the top end athletically focused schools.I think D1 should have the better wrestlers. They have more athletes to choose from.
Am I wrong in how I'm thinking about that?
Sometimes you have to compromise.
Reach for the stars and settle with the Moon!
thanks
Does that mean they probably won’t like my Organic Division idea also?Or just accept that the majority of wrestling people like the 3 division system for a state like Ohio...I mean you ran a poll and those that cared enough to vote...voted keep it the same. The hardcore wrestling people in the state (who actually have a say in stuff) are also not going to vote to reduce # of divisions.
If you called it, 'Organic, Free Range, Gluten Free' folks would be jumping on board...Does that mean they probably won’t like my Organic Division idea also?
You mean my grandparents farmIf you called it, 'Organic, Free Range, Gluten Free' folks would be jumping on board...