I give up ....it is clear to anyone in those meetings the impact the tournament match-ups have and how those are impacted by seeding.I'm not avoiding anything but I am trying to stay topic. The RPI if accepted with determine seeding. If we agree there will be a difference between the results from coach voting and the RPI formula, I see it being resolved before or at least by district finals. To me the seeding determines who your first few games are against. When you forecast out to the regional spots, everyone in multiple districts has a chance to be there. By the time we see regional games those teams have to be playing very well and their sectional seeding is irrelevant by that point. IMO
You keep going to Taft to make your point even though you know this whole discussion is because OHSAA is looking for a possible way to make the basketball tournaments similar to the football playoff where everything is uniformed for everyone. If Taft is the #1 team in the state and CHCA is the #2 team in the state, that will make one outstanding District final.
Again, we have no documented proof that OHSAA wants everyone to use this or that all the districts like it, except for posters saying so. The only facts are that the NW coaches voted to use it and its rankings were amazingly inaccurate for D3 last year