Vote for the top three HS Football Dynasties Over The Last 5 Years

Which 10 teams are the top football dynasties over the last 5 years

  • Total voters
    53
N

naughty

New member
Vote for the top 10 HS Football Dynasties Over The Last 5 Years

Pick your top 10 dynasties over the last 5 years.
 
Last edited:
 
I screwed up, as I think several others did. I voted for eight teams before I got bored. Then I realized it was for the top three. Oops.

I voted for:

DLS
SLC
Hoover
St. X
Pratville
South Panola
Indy
Trinity

If I can only vote for three, give me

SLC
South Panola
Indy
 
consumerman said:
5 years is NOT a dynasty

there are some states that allow 5 years of eiligibility for 5th year seniors
Click to expand...

Several posters are getting hung up on the word "dynasty". We all know the vote is for the best football team over the last 5 years. Some people call it a dynasty some do not. Who cares?

I voted for SLC, Independence and Colerain. On second thought perhaps I should have voted for StX instead of Colerain due to SOS. Due to the tough Ohio playoff system I thought a team from Ohio deserved to be on the list. SLC is a no-brainer because of what they have done in a very tough football state. Independence has a weaker SOS but they went undefeated for 4 years and have more wins than anybody so they got my vote.

For all-time dynasty my vote goes to DLS but not for the last 5 years since they had 8 non-win games.
 
Last edited:
SLCDad said:
Several posters are getting hung up on the word "dynasty". We all know the vote is for the best football team over the last 5 years. Some people call it a dynasty some do not. Who cares?
Click to expand...
Yes, to some people language matters. To some, words have meaning. To others, they don't. Consider the source.
 
pied said:
Do you have examples of that?
Click to expand...

Of course.

Off the top of my head:

The Steelers of the mid to late 70's under Bradshaw QB.
The Cowboys of the early 90's with Aikman, Smith and Irvin.
SLC of 2002-2006.
Midland Lee of the late 1990's in Texas.
Lakeland of 2004-2006 in Florida.
The 49ers of 85-90.
U of Florida basketball 2006-07.
USC football in early-mid 2000's.
Nebraska football in the late 1990's under Osborne.
Rice baseball.
SLC of 1988-1992 in 3A.
Univ of Louisville Basketball in the early 1990s (as said by Dick Vitale at the time).

There are many, many more. I've heard all of the above referred to as dynasties.
 
Steelers were six years.

49ers were at least nine (1981-1989) and possibly 14 (1981-1994).

When you have to reach for a Texas 3A team your case might be just a bit weak.

Using the term just because you heard someone else use it is not a great reason. You say a lot of idiotic things. If other people quote you, does that lead to any good? Every once in a while (or more often), someone needs to stand in the way of morons like you.

I am glad Pied and Elwood did.
 
Why should he do better?

I don't think it was really a shot. You are what you are.

Should he add the dancing banana or something? Or a couple of big words?
 
Chicago said:
Steelers were six years.

49ers were at least nine (1981-1989) and possibly 14 (1981-1994).

When you have to reach for a Texas 3A team your case might be just a bit weak.

Using the term just because you heard someone else use it is not a great reason. You say a lot of idiotic things. If other people quote you, does that lead to any good? Every once in a while (or more often), someone needs to stand in the way of morons like you.

I am glad Pied and Elwood did.
Click to expand...

A mornon? Take a long look in the mirror. I suppose you'll have a problem with these links. LOL Give me a break.

http://www.amazon.com/Greatest-Team-Ever-Cowboys-Dynasty/dp/1401603408

http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/12-4-2001-6434.asp

http://www.mcmillenandwife.com/index_history.html

http://www.fansedge.com/Florida-Gat...-Championship-Dynasty-Watch_154601178_PD.html

USC's Pete Carroll builds a modern day football dynasty: http://displacedtrojan.blogspot.com/2006/11/usc-football-game-day-tennis-anyone.html

June 28, 2007
Kendall Rogers
Rivals.com College Baseball Editor

BRENTWOOD, Tenn. - Another college baseball dynasty has officially been created, as Oregon State tops the Rivals.com Top 25 for the second-straight season.

http://www.steinersports.com/ssm/co...ssionid=EDBF4471963393E04E41E814739CDBA3.ssm1

http://www.steinersports.com/ssm/control//category/~pcategory=1001/~browseCats=5009/~index=1

http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2005/02/07/dynasty_boston_globe/

http://media.www.themontclarion.org...e.Does.The.Patriots.Dynasty.Rank-859313.shtml

http://www.reporternews.com/news/2007/nov/28/how-southlake-abilene-compare/

http://www.statesman.com/sports/content/sports/stories/highschool/12/06/1206breazeale.html

http://calpreps.com/National_dynasty_ratings.htm

I could go on and on and on and on. There are HUNDREDS of examples in sports of teams referred to as dynasties with many over periods of only two or three years.
 
Last edited:
a) It's nice to see Elwood suckered you into all that effort.

b) I imagine a book called The Dallas Cowboys: The Four Years in The 90s They Were Really Good would have been tougher to sell.

c) I don't think there is any doubt in anyone's mind that you could go on and on and on and on and on.
 
Chicago said:
a) It's nice to see Elwood suckered you into all that effort.

b) I imagine a book called The Dallas Cowboys: The Four Years in The 90s They Were Really Good would have been tougher to sell.

c) I don't think there is any doubt in anyone's mind that you could go on and on and on and on and on.
Click to expand...

The "effort" took 5 mins. It was very easy to prove both Chicago and Elwood to be dead wrong. Piece of cake.
 
That's 4-1/2 minutes more than I would have taken.

I try to type very, very slowly so you can understand things, but it never seems to work.
 
Chicago said:
That's 4-1/2 minutes more than I would have taken.

I try to type very, very slowly so you can understand things, but it never seems to work.
Click to expand...

As ususal, that's the best you can do. Sad.

I know "substance" is hard for you, but give it a shot once in a while.

(The last time you posted anything of substance it was a total joke so I understand why you don't try it very often.)
 
SLCDad said:
There are hundreds, probably thousands. Didn't you know that?


-
Click to expand...
My goodness, you are like a dog with a bone. The suggestion that you are not very bright, was not enough. You are dead set upon proving it beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Please do continue...:rolleyes:
 
elwood said:
My goodness, you are like a dog with a bone. The suggestion that you are not very bright, was not enough. You are dead set upon proving it beyond any shadow of a doubt.

Please do continue...:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Let me get this straight, the guy who is proven wrong (you) is the smart one. Got it.

Let me quote you: "Yes, to some people language matters. To some, words have meaning. To others, they don't. Consider the source."

In this case, Elwoody, you have no clue about language nor the meaning of words.

Elwoody, does Naughts now have your permission to use the word "dynasty" in the tread he started? Please let us know so we can continue. Thanks.

-
 
Last edited:
SLCDad said:
Let me get this straight, the guy who is proven wrong (you) is the smart one. Got it.

Let me quote you: "Yes, to some people language matters. To some, words have meaning. To others, they don't. Consider the source."

In this case, Elwoody, you have no clue about language nor the meaning of words.
Click to expand...
grrr..... ruff...ruff.... gimme that bone...... grrr....
 
elwood said:
grrr..... ruff...ruff.... gimme that bone...... grrr....
Click to expand...

Hey Elwood, does Naughts have your permission to use the word "dynasty" in his thread? Can the rest of us use the word?

Since you are the self appointed expert on the meaning of words I thought I'd better ask first. You've had several panic attacks when this word as been used in this forum it's only right that we ask your permission first. Thanks!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top