Admittedly, I have been a little out of the loop of the club scene for a little while, but it seems like Vanguard has had a lot more college recruits over the past several seasons compared to Attack.
However, it is interesting to me because it seems that when Attack and Vanguard's top teams play at the upper levels, it is usually a pretty even fight.
So, what gives? Is Vanguard's club management just that much better at selling their players as recruits?
Are Vanguard's players better athletes (whereas Attack has more players who are solid volleyballers because they have played since 4th grade) - thus better fit to play collegiately?
Or, has Vanguard had a couple studs (the college commits) each year that carry the team, whereas Attack has less studs, but more solid team play?
Just curious what the thoughts are out there - I hope to see more guys from the other areas of the state play in college.
However, it is interesting to me because it seems that when Attack and Vanguard's top teams play at the upper levels, it is usually a pretty even fight.
So, what gives? Is Vanguard's club management just that much better at selling their players as recruits?
Are Vanguard's players better athletes (whereas Attack has more players who are solid volleyballers because they have played since 4th grade) - thus better fit to play collegiately?
Or, has Vanguard had a couple studs (the college commits) each year that carry the team, whereas Attack has less studs, but more solid team play?
Just curious what the thoughts are out there - I hope to see more guys from the other areas of the state play in college.