eastisbest
Well-known member
Hoping Cinci makes the question moot.
I still don't buy that one more game will break these kids. If high school kids, D3 players, D2 players, and FCS players can play 15 then FBS players can play 16.
Spit the bit when matched with a quality opponent. No passing game
40-32 is "spit the bit?" With their second string QB? And out scored LSU in the 4th, which if I understand the term, hardly constitutes spit the bit.
I think they made a very good case for what they were before their QB went down and they're certainly quality even now.
I wonder what they could have done with Milton at QB in this game. I periodically watched this game, and it seemed to me that the backup missed a few crucial throws that Milton would not have likely missed on.
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
East, the final score was very misleading as to how completely LSU dominated UCF....
While stats aren't everything they were pretty eye opening for this game:!
Ok, if team A DOMINATES the stats and team B wins by a point, guess what that means? Team B was better.
Coaches call the game based upon the score, not the stat line.
Silly to think they were a top 4 team or had a shot last year. At 6 it is likely they were overrated very likely
LSU should be tough next year
Here's all we need to know regarding if UCF deserved a playoff spot:
LSU offense scored 40 on the Knights.
LSU offense scored 0 on Alabama.
Actually they didn't. UCF had a pick-6 - so 25 points. Additionally the LSU defense was missing at least half their secondary - maybe the entire secondary by the end of the 1st Qtr due to the punch and targeting. UCF was playing without their QB, the backup wasn't the best passer. Wouldn't necessarily call that even, but had UCF made it to the Playoff, I'd expect a similar result as Notre Dame against either Clemson or Alabama.Here's all we need to know regarding the solidness of that logic.
UCF's offense scored 32 on LSU.
Ala's offense scored 29 on LSU.
:shrug:
If the P5 isn't going to give UCF OOC, then they're saying by their definition, UCF doesn't deserve a play-off spot, ever. Likewise, UCF should make a clear record of attempting to get those contests against top P5 schools.
Actually they didn't. UCF had a pick-6 - so 25 points. Additionally the LSU defense was missing at least half their secondary - maybe the entire secondary by the end of the 1st Qtr due to the punch and targeting. UCF was playing without their QB, the backup wasn't the best passer. Wouldn't necessarily call that even, but had UCF made it to the Playoff, I'd expect a similar result as Notre Dame against either Clemson or Alabama.
Stop it.
UCF scored 32 on LSU. It doesn't matter how it comes.
It does in the context of the post. Easisbest is literally said UCF's "offense" scored 32 on LSU.....
OSU tansfer Burrow showed that he was a pretty fair QB for LSU.
It does in the context of the post. Easisbest is literally said UCF's "offense" scored 32 on LSU.....
Stop it.
UCF scored 32 on LSU. It doesn't matter how it comes.
You're wasting your time, thavoice. ads is nothing but a P5 ELITIST!
Here's all we need to know regarding if UCF deserved a playoff spot:
LSU offense scored 40 on the Knights.
LSU offense scored 0 on Alabama.
Max did you have the same 4 playoff teams as the committee? Curious to see the final rankings and how it all played out. Do you do a rankings post bowl season or just at the end of the regular season