Trump's Rape Victim Speaks.

 
ProV1 said:
Depends on who you are talking about when you say not taken seriously. She changed her story a few times which leads to credibility questions and there was never any legal action. Not sure what you want and from who?
Click to expand...
ProV1. I read your comments and sometimes, many times, I agree but I ask now, who do you believe? I am sure you remember the Denise Huskins case and how she was dragged through the MSM as a liar. Is Tara Reid to believed? When is a rape victim to be discounted?
 
Gamma Gobbler said:
ProV1. I read your comments and sometimes, many times, I agree but I ask now, who do you believe? I am sure you remember the Denise Huskins case and how she was dragged through the MSM as a liar. Is Tara Reid to believed? When is a rape victim to be discounted?
Click to expand...
First, I think there is a difference between believable, questionable, and discounted. No accusation is the same. Who is the accuser? How consistent is the story? How believable is the scenario? I think the reason Tara Reid's story did not get as much traction is because there was zero legal action and her story changed several times.
 
ProV1 said:
First, I think there is a difference between believable, questionable, and discounted. No accusation is the same. Who is the accuser? How consistent is the story? How believable is the scenario? I think the reason Tara Reid's story did not get as much traction is because there was zero legal action and her story changed several times.
Click to expand...
There's a huge difference when the DOJ has been proven to lie and conceal to protect one person or family, or when the DOJ will pretty much indict you for spitting on the sidewalk.
 
ProV1 said:
First, I think there is a difference between believable, questionable, and discounted. No accusation is the same. Who is the accuser? How consistent is the story? How believable is the scenario? I think the reason Tara Reid's story did not get as much traction is because there was zero legal action and her story changed several times.
Click to expand...
Interesting take and I am tracking but rape victims can an do have varying dispositions of events throughout time. When do we discount those?

If you remember the Huskins case, that was totally unbelievable even by the right MSM but proven true. Should Reid be discounted even though she has changed her narrative?
 
I even hate the title of this thread, as it forwards a bold-faced lie on behalf of the Democrats.

Someone should make @BlackandGold , @goldentornado , or one of the other cry-baby-bitch neoMarxist trolls cry to the moderator in the server, and get it blown up.

The crazy old bitch is just selling her book. Trump raped no one. He's never been convicted of a rape. He never will be.
 
OldSoulon said:
There's a huge difference when the DOJ has been proven to lie and conceal to protect one person or family, or when the DOJ will pretty much indict you for spitting on the sidewalk.
Click to expand...
What in the world does the DOJ have to do with Tara Reid?
 
Gamma Gobbler said:
Interesting take and I am tracking but rape victims can an do have varying dispositions of events throughout time. When do we discount those?

If you remember the Huskins case, that was totally unbelievable even by the right MSM but proven true. Should Reid be discounted even though she has changed her narrative?
Click to expand...
What makes it interesting? Are you one of those people who thinks every accusation a person makes against another is legit? Or just sexual ones?

I understand that victims can have various recollections. That said, hers was 7 years old when she made the accusation. Told several different versions. Never brought charges. Never took civil action and raised it publicly only during an election year. I think it is fair to throw some shade.

Now, had there been 15 -20 other accusers, a history of barebacking pornstars and paying them off and Biden saying he grabs women by the p-ssy all the time, I might give her a bit more benefit of the doubt, I suppose.
 
cabezadecaballo said:
I even hate the title of this thread, as it forwards a bold-faced lie on behalf of the Democrats.

Someone should make @BlackandGold , @goldentornado , or one of the other cry-baby-bitch neoMarxist trolls cry to the moderator in the server, and get it blown up.

The crazy old bitch is just selling her book. Trump raped no one. He's never been convicted of a rape. He never will be.
Click to expand...
Rape? No

Sexual abuse? Yep! Convicted 😊
 
ProV1 said:
What makes it interesting? Are you one of those people who thinks every accusation a person makes against another is legit? Or just sexual ones?

I understand that victims can have various recollections. That said, hers was 7 years old when she made the accusation. Told several different versions. Never brought charges. Never took civil action and raised it publicly only during an election year. I think it is fair to throw some shade.

Now, had there been 15 -20 other accusers, a history of barebacking pornstars and paying them off and Biden saying he grabs women by the p-ssy all the time, I might give her a bit more benefit of the doubt, I suppose.
Click to expand...
The same could be said for Christine Blasey Ford. What are your thoughts to provide the same defense for Kavanaugh?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top