OldSoulon
Well-known member
Would you still get would reading it?LOL. If everybody blocked posters for “egregious” comments, there would be no debate forum.
Would you still get would reading it?LOL. If everybody blocked posters for “egregious” comments, there would be no debate forum.
I disagree with 90% of the people on this forum yet have not blocked anyone because that is a chicken $schit move on a debate forum.If you want to read what idiots post I guess that is your choice. Myself, I'd rather read posts from educated posters. To each their own.
Congrats, You have made my ignore list.I disagree with 90% of the people on this forum yet have not blocked anyone because that is a chicken $schit move on a debate forum.
Much like with social media, I think some of you love coming here because it is an echo chamber and whether known or unbeknownst enjoy validation through agreement and getting likes.
KCongrats, You have made my ignore list.
Presidential immunity does not seem like something the founders intended...but here we are...
Trump immunity bid opposed by 19 top former defense officials in brief filed with Supreme Court
Nineteen retired generals, admirals and former top civilian defense officials have filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court opposing former President Donald Trump’s bid for immunity from prosecution.www.stripes.com
What weaklings. They must have been scared to go to the playground as grade school kids, too.
I know for sure they didn't want a guy taking bribes from foreign countries to enrich his family and give his loser son a high paying job.Presidential immunity does not seem like something the founders intended...but here we are...
Trump immunity bid opposed by 19 top former defense officials in brief filed with Supreme Court
Nineteen retired generals, admirals and former top civilian defense officials have filed a brief with the U.S. Supreme Court opposing former President Donald Trump’s bid for immunity from prosecution.www.stripes.com
Hmm. Did they want Trump to make millions from the Saudi Government last week? What job did his son-in-law get?I know for sure they didn't want a guy taking bribes from foreign countries to enrich his family and give his loser son a high paying job.
Like Biden has.
Or why can't slappy admit he is simply a hack?Yet, you weren't outraged before he "wealked it back.
Why can't you just admit that Biden and Trump are equally dirty?
Everything Trump touches goes to hell.Another member of the Trump crime syndicate going to jail....LOCK THEM UP!
I bet it's because you didn't use the correct pronoun.Or why can't slappy admit he is simply a hack?
It’s funny because you don’t understand.
It's funny because you constantly fail. LOLIt’s funny because you still don’t understand.
"Inconsistencies" I Love That!!! In the Leftist to English dictionary "Inconsistencies" is defined as Ole Fat Fannie stole about a half million dollars out the til, and spent it on trips to Rio and Sparkling Ripple. And she's the point man for the Lefty's kangaroo court down in Atlanta. Honestly, the jokes just write themselves with these fools.DOJ Unmasks ‘Inconsistencies’ in Fani Willis’s Use of Federal Grant Funds
View attachment 57217
The Justice Department said Friday it unmasked “inconsistencies” in Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis’s use of federal grant funds, confirming whistleblower allegations. Willis previously fired the whistleblower who alleged the Fulton County office mishandled $488,000 of federal grant money to pay for “swag,” computers, and travel.
“It’s that same grant that the Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs now says is plagued with reporting discrepancies from Willis’s office,” the Washington Free Beacon’s Andrew Kerr reported Wednesday.
DOJ Unmasks 'Inconsistencies' in Fani Willis's Use of Federal Grant Funds
The Justice Department said it unmasked "inconsistencies" in Fulton County Prosecutor Fani Willis's use of federal grant funds.www.breitbart.com
It's funny because you constantly fail. LOL
See, continued failing.