I know that has been the scary Cult propaganda point, but it’s not really a thing. Biden’s speech is a perfect example. Basically just talked about doing better at enforcing existing law and the kooks started having their canniptions.
He spoke a lot about better enforcement and support (funding) of local police so yeah. Don’t think bail came up but that's more a states issue.
Pretty sure Hitler said he was done taking land after Czechoslovakia ?
As I said, let's see where this goes.
About the furthest it could go is discussion of restrictions like clips and assault rifles. That is not confiscation. Given the current make up of Congress, it won’t get any further than talk.
Ok. Let's see where this goes.
This is who I aspire to be
apnews.com
If the plan is to go no further than talk then why the waste of time talking about it. I have a good idea lets not say anything in protest, warnings or point out difference in Ideas or thoughts until it is to late to do anything to fight what has happened. We know from history that as far as takeover of countries there are points of no return. I do not think we should silence ore voices of opposition until that time.
And - dumber than a box of rocks.
Ding Ding Ding. Hitler propaganda in the house!
Go ahead and talk about it. Just be honest. Dont lie and distort and talk about dropping bombs on your own country and confiscation and all kinds of other BS.
Biden a dictator. That be a new one even for The Cult.
That is a lie. His reference to planes an nukes was not in relation to using them. His reference was to what rebels would need to compete and how the 2nd amendment does not allow for that. Nobody is buying your propaganda.
How do you know what he meant when he doesn't know what he meant?
BS. Propaganda!? Really?! Why say it, if not in relation to using it? It was at best a reminder to those who might rebel what the US military is capable of, at worst a threat. With all the talk of Jan. 6 and Trump returning and conspiracies and yada yada yada, you think Biden was simply making a comparison? You know damn well if Trump said something like this, you would have lost your mind.
Well only he really knows what he meant but if the propaganda being pushed is that it was a veiled threat, I am offering a logic based and common sense explanation for what he said that makes 1000 times more sense. Further, if you just use his actual words, they were not confusing in the slightest. It was in a presser for combatting violence. It is in the context of discussing what the 2nd amendment allows and it’s limitations. He said the 2nd amendment would need to allow for weaponry equal to that of the government and gave examples. At no point was there a conversation about insurrections or dropping bombs or any of the rubbish that is being spewed.
He said it in relation to 2nd amendment limits and use you fool. This was not a discussion of what appropriate weaponry should or would be used. It was a discussion of the type of weaponry that the 2nd amendment would need to protect in order for it to be an effective tool to stop a tyrannical government. Your BS misrepresentation is total propaganda.
So clearly you don't have any idea what he meant, you were using your logic and common sense which clearly has not served you well.
LOL. If what you pulled out of his statements was threats of dropping nukes on our own country, your comprehension has hit an alarming low.
It was very clear and I have summed it for you in language a toddler could understand.
I didn't say that or pretend that I knew what he meant. You seem to assume quite a bit....LMAO
I agree you, and Joe, for that matter, have the logic skills of toddlers.
