What’s he deleting?
lol at Yappi deleting posts
lol at Yappi deleting posts
What’s he deleting?
I didn't say anything about doing away with the electoral college. The state doesn't decide how many electoral votes they have. I am a Centrist. I don't have a side that got cheated. If there is cheating that effects all of us. If we went to a centralized voting system there would be no need for the possibility of challenging votes on the state level.Did you have this thought last general election ? Of course not . So if the electoral college works for you it’s all good , but now that it didn’t it’s time to may be change things ? Because your side got cheated ? Lmao. No conservative values say keep it the same as the Stone Age. Lol . Conserve the antiquated electoral college and give power to the states is a conservative staple . You would just want it changed back the next time you lose
If it is working just fine as it is, why are so many claiming this election was a fraud and the Capitol was overrun?It works just fine as is.
Assuming mail voting continues to be a thing, the states just need to get their sht together so they can count the votes in a day instead of a week.
Because we elected an orange, narcissistic, man-child in 2016?If it is working just fine as it is, why are so many claiming this election was a fraud and the Capitol was overrun?
If it is working just fine as it is, why are so many claiming this election was a fraud and the Capitol was overrun?
If the ballot is the same for all voters, if the way we are permitted to vote is the same for all voters and if the votes are counted in the same way across the nation then there can be no way someone can challenge the vote of individual states. I separate Presidential vote only should expedite the election. Each states are counted separately to maintain the electoral college and every state electoral vote will be cast the same.Because they're mad they lost? ?
Again, it works fine the way it is. Since the Federal government pretty much turns everything they "oversee" to sht, it seems silly to suggest that they be in charge of elections.
The more I think about it, this would take significant constitutional amendments, so highly unlikely.If the ballot is the same for all voters, if the way we are permitted to vote is the same for all voters and if the votes are counted in the same way across the nation then there can be no way someone can challenge the vote of individual states. I separate Presidential vote only should expedite the election. Each states are counted separately to maintain the electoral college and every state electoral vote will be cast the same.
So how can you have no more mail in voting if the states decide for themselves how the votes will be cast in their individual state?No way should it be federal controlled. Even more chance of fraud then now.
Voting needs to use block chain. In block Chain programing you cannot alter the block.. if you wish it alter the information in a block you must add another block with the changes you made.. This gives a record of what changed.
Also no more mail in voting.. military would be the only exception. you want to vote get your to the pole... if your on vaca or business too bad.
You can be a real buzz kill at timesThe more I think about it, this would take significant constitutional amendments, so highly unlikely.
Sorry. Beers on me.You can be a real buzz kill at times
Thanks for making my pointNo...they simply never bothered (or were prohibited by legislative pissing matches and/or antiquated laws) to set up the infrastructure/processes to do it, despite knowing 8 weeks in advance that the avalanche of mail ballots was coming.
Anyway, clearly those are the states I was referring to as needing to get their sht together if mail voting is going to continue. There likely isn't anything that casts more doubt on an election than taking a week to count the votes.
FWIW, I've never understood the fascination with the distribution of votes within a state the GOP has. The whole "my guy won X number of counties versus the other guys Y" argument and the red versus blue breakdown maps they like to post. Other than the fact it's convenient and beneficial for them, why should one person's vote (and where they live) matter more or less than another's? Seems undemocratic. We already heavily discount the power of many people's vote with the Electoral College and amplify others.
Harry thinks you voted for trump and are mad. You'll have to excuse him. He is, as sleepy joe would say, a one trick horse...or something like that.I didn't say anything about doing away with the electoral college. The state doesn't decide how many electoral votes they have. I am a Centrist. I don't have a side that got cheated. If there is cheating that effects all of us. If we went to a centralized voting system there would be no need for the possibility of challenging votes on the state level.
Free Beer! All is forgivenSorry. Beers on me.
Without balanced representation, the entire thing falls apart. The whole “land doesn’t vote, people do” trope misses that point entirely. If you can’t balance urban and rural, only urbanites and large states will matter and they will have complete control of the Federal government.
Thanks for making my point
So how can you have no more mail in voting if the states decide for themselves how the votes will be cast in their individual state?
Interesting read.Your point earlier about the Senate takes care of the of the balance. The issue with the Electoral college, and thus the House of Representatives, is that the House has not been increased in size since 1929, when it was capped at 435. That means the federal voting power of people in Ohio is 1/4 that of the people of Wyoming or North Dakota in the House
Wyoming Rule - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Anyway, clearly those are the states I was referring to as needing to get their sht together if mail voting is going to continue. There likely isn't anything that casts more doubt on an election than taking a week to count the votes.Kind of the opposite akshually lol.
Anyway, clearly those are the states I was referring to as needing to get their sht together if mail voting is going to continue. There likely isn't anything that casts more doubt on an election than taking a week to count the votes.
If the states are doing what they individually want to do than you have no right to complain about it. State run elections. What could possibly go wrong?
Your point earlier about the Senate takes care of the of the balance. The issue with the Electoral college, and thus the House of Representatives, is that the House has not been increased in size since 1929, when it was capped at 435. That means the federal voting power of people in Ohio is 1/4 that of the people of Wyoming or North Dakota in the House
Wyoming Rule - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
You want the state to handle the presidential elections on the state level but then you say they are doing it wrong and need to get their sht together.I’m obviously not complaining about anything. You’re starting to talk yourself in circles lol.
You want the state to handle the presidential elections on the state level but then you say they are doing it wrong and need to get their sht together.
If the state are handling the election the way they see fit there is no sht to get together. So why are you complaining that the way they are doing things will cast doubt on an election?
Because the guy who lost is a malignant narcissist who said the election was a fraud because he lost . He had enough enablers who stuck with him because of their own ambitions . It’s a cult and every challenge and suit was thrown out by every judge who heard them or had to rule. Why do you think “. SO MANY “ are claiming fraud ? Is it because there is so much evidence ? If so why didn’t even one case go Trumps way ?(. Over 50 and some of the judges were appointed by a Trump ). He’s a conman and a pathological liar who has a following who actually believed him and for some god forsaken reason. IN HIM ., I can’t tell you whyIf it is working just fine as it is, why are so many claiming this election was a fraud and the Capitol was overrun?
Context is the Presidential election chief
So what am I missing? You are clearly stating that there are states that need to get their sht together. Do you think there is a problem or not? You can't have it both ways.No...they simply never bothered (or were prohibited by legislative pissing matches and/or antiquated laws) to set up the infrastructure/processes to do it, despite knowing 8 weeks in advance that the avalanche of mail ballots was coming.
Anyway, clearly those are the states I was referring to as needing to get their sht together if mail voting is going to continue. There likely isn't anything that casts more doubt on an election than taking a week to count the votes.