OldSchool76 said:
Let me get this straight since your the moderator of this forum, that also makes you the deciding factor on who is winning this debate.
Being a moderator has nothing to do with deciding who is winning a debate. When someone in a debate defers to name calling and attempts at making fun of the person they are debating shows that they are losing in expressing intelligent points of view. No where did I use my status as a moderator to edit, delete or manipulate posts made by Vox Crusada.
Again, your PERSONAL, bias against Crable weighs down every argument you have against this guy.
Your nose is so far up Crable's it weighs down any defense you may attempt to counter with so I guess we are even.
Every football season, you bring up the same old tired argument, and every year the team improves.
This is an intersting argument Crable backers bring up a lot. I did some checking and here are some interesting FACTS. In 1995 under Coach Klonne Moeller went 5-5. The five seasons after 1995 Moeller's record was as follows:
9-3 1-1 in the playoffs and 2-1 in the GCL
12=2 3-1 in the playoffs as state runner-up and 3-0 GCL champs.
7-3 2-1 in the GCL
6-5 0-1 in the playoffs and 1-2 in the GCL
9-2 0-1 with a disappointing loss to Fairfield in the playoffs and 2-1 in the GCL.
In Crable's first year he went 5-5 and here is his record since:
7-4 0-1 in playoffs, 1-2 in the GCL
8-4 1-1 in playoffs, 2-1 in the GCL
10-3 2-1 in playoffs, 2-1 in the GCL
Currently 4-2 and 0-1 in the GCL. Could very well end up at 6-4 and out of the playoffs.
So in the 5 years after going 5-5 in 1995 Moeller was in the state finals and won the GCL one year and shared the GCL title another year.
IN Crable's 4 years after going 5-5 he has yet to win the GCL title and has progressed to the Regional finals once but lost.
I question whether the Crable era is any better than the teams of the late 1990's
The only area that may have improved is the attitude and some of the unsportsmanlike activity that started rearing its ugly head the last couple years before Crable took over.
I will applaud Crable for cleaning up some of that stuff. But outside of that I think there is room for argument that the team has really improved.
Moeller has a lot of pride in its program and there is a lot of tradition. That tradition alone will make Moeller competitive. But I believe one could actually make an argument that under Crable they have actually come up short in their performances because of the way the team has been coached. Losing to Anderson is just one example of what I am stating.
Will the real moderator, Crusader3, shut down this topic. It serves no purpose.
There are three moderators on here and I believe we do a good job with this forum. The three of us don't always agree with things but we have handled differences in a constructive manner.
As for this thread serving no purpose, it is airing out two different points of view in regards to how Moeller's team is being coached. It just so happens you don't like to hear about the problems that exist. Maybe if you would quit sucking up so much and step back a bit you might realize that there are some serious issues that need to be dealt with and until they are Moeller will not win another state title. But you and folks like Vox Crusada are too biased in your own viewpoints to understand that point.