Did he break the law or not? Doesn’t matter if she hated his guts. He committed fraud and tax evasion.
False.
Did he break the law or not? Doesn’t matter if she hated his guts. He committed fraud and tax evasion.
Yes. If you settle, you are admitting loss. Either way, you lose.
Might be winning to you but when you settle you pay. That is losing.Also false.
Yes. He will likely settle. If not, he will lose.
You asked if they were going to get Trump. They will.LOL, how is your response even remotely related to the post you are responding to?
Yet.Are you people stupid? Trump did not break any law based on the FACT that he hasn't been charged with any crime.
Enabled him to defraud banks for loans. Genius. Now do you get it?That’s what I don’t get. If the property was overvalued didn’t that cost Trump more in property taxes ..etc.?
Banks. You can’t lie to banks when begging for credit.Who was defrauded?
Not true. Plenty of evidence. Documents showing over evaluation of property when applying for loans. Plenty of evidence of tax evasion as well.She chose this route because there's zero evidence a crime has been committed.
You do understand President Trump and the Trump organization are audited by the IRS pretty much annually? Since they haven't found a single incident of fraud or evasion, what makes you nuts suddenly believe you have? Inflated assets???
We all laugh hardily at your impotence.
Did he default on the loans?Enabled him to defraud banks for loans. Genius. Now do you get it?
I don’t know. He’s not accused of that. That is not his crime.Did he default on the loans?
Not true. Plenty of evidence. Documents showing over evaluation of property when applying for loans. Plenty of evidence of tax evasion as well.
You asked if they were going to get Trump. They will.
If he didn't default on his loans what does it matter? He is/has been paying them regularly.I don’t know. He’s not accused of that. That is not his crime.
But...but...but... we've got him this time.If he didn't default on his loans what does it matter? He is/has been paying them regularly.
And it's a civil suit....not criminal.
IRS did audits based on the values he submitted. If his taxes reflected the loan valuations, he does not have a tax problem. If he deflated the properties for tax purposes and exaggerated them for loan purposes, his is in a world of hurt. That is exactly what his fixer said he was doing. The AG already said she sent their findings to NY Tax department.lol
The NY AG is smarter than the banks who loaned him money and the entire IRS who audited him on multiple occasions?
You people are hilarious.
Why didn't they sue?Enabled him to defraud banks for loans. Genius. Now do you get it?
He'a not charged with any crime.I don’t know. He’s not accused of that. That is not his crime.
"Over evaluation." Is that a thing?Not true. Plenty of evidence. Documents showing over evaluation of property when applying for loans. Plenty of evidence of tax evasion as well.
The loans were paid off so no they weren't defrauded.Banks. You can’t lie to banks when begging for credit.
The banks are responsible for due diligence.Not true. Plenty of evidence. Documents showing over evaluation of property when applying for loans. Plenty of evidence of tax evasion as well.
You cant defraud someone if you pay them backI don’t know. He’s not accused of that. That is not his crime.
Hmmm... that sounds like full blown communism.The banks are responsible for due diligence.
This is the thing. Even if he did overvalue the properties to obtain loans, what are the damages and who suffered them? If the loans were paid back, how can you argue damages? If they weren’t paid back, wouldn’t it be the banks that suffered the damage and not the government?The loans were paid off so no they weren't defrauded.
Federal banking laws come into play once that happens. (as they should)If they weren’t paid back, wouldn’t it be the banks that suffered the damage and not the government?
Tish James campaigned on and conducted her office for the purpose of investigating a political opponent and those around him trying to find a crime. That is Soviet-level prosecutorial abuse where individuals are targeted not to prosecute a crime, but to sift through their lives in the hope of finding a crime.
And lacking a prosecutable crime, trying to bring them down and purge them from the economic world through a civil lawsuit.
James’ conduct is a disgrace to the Office of Attorney General.
They are not responsible for fraud by the customer. Fact.The banks are responsible for due diligence.
Yes you can.You cant defraud someone if you pay them back![]()