I am a fan of high school football and have been for 40 years
As the internet expanded football info, it was enlightening to learn of other states and also some of the myths
for instance Texas awesome state wide six rounds of playoffs tunred out to be not all that it was made out to be
two split divisions, 4th place teams making the playoffs (every single one), watered down 3-7 and 4-6 teams participating, not a real true state champion as the two split winners dont meet, small schools in the big school division, big schools in the small school division, and on and on
not quite what was advertised
now that brings us to Ohio and particularly the GCL
I can remember first reading about Moeller in the USA Today in 1982 and was dumbfounded how a Cincinnati team would rate #1. SO that perked interest. Then we see how Ohio claims to be the best state in the nation and the GCL the best league in the nation. (not that other states dont also claim those things).
Well the Herbie is now several years old and one thing is for sure. the GCL is not doing very well, going 3-8
AFter the most recent 1-3 performacne, I thought a natural question is the GCL all that its supporters say it is. Well we get the LaSalle is no good and Moeller and Elder are just mediocre excuses.
Well being the sharp wit (lol) that I am, I said how can the GCL be the best league in the country when it 1) only has 4 teams and 2) 3 of them are no good, mediocre or ok?
I put out the thread to see if someone could offer proof that the GCL is better than its on the field performance and quite frankly, a lot of wannabes are bitching and moaning but no proof has been offered to alter the assertion thatthe GCL is NOT all that it is up to be
Let me know if I need to request your permission on my next interest or thought process
LMAO